Kwaselow A, McLean J, Busse W, Bush R, Reed C, Metzger W, Richerson H, Shulan D, Koshiver J, Chaplin M
Allergy. 1985 Jul;40(5):363-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1985.tb00248.x.
Intranasal flunisolide is an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis. Flunisolide has high bioavailability when administered to normal subjects (50% of an intranasal dose reaches the systemic circulation) with minimal systemic effects. Bioavailability in patients with active rhinitis averages 62.4 +/- 15.7%. The oral dose bioequivalent to 100 micrograms intranasally is 500 micrograms. To define the comparative trial and systemic effects of intranasal flunisolide in patients with active allergic rhinitis, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted during the 1983 ragweed hayfever season. Ninety-nine patients with ragweed hayfever for greater than or equal to 2 years and positive prick skin tests to ragweed were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: 0 = oral flunisolide 500 micrograms b.i.d. and intranasal placebo b.i.d.; N = intranasal flunisolide 50 micrograms per nostril b.i.d. and oral placebo b.i.d.; P = intranasal and oral placebo b.i.d. Treatment continued for 4 weeks. Patients kept daily symptom scores. Patients were evaluated by a blinded observer every 2 weeks and were globally evaluated at the study's end. Data were analyzed for each center and pooled. There were no significant differences in symptom severity of sneezing, nasal congestion, and throat itch in the 0 (oral flunisolide) and P (placebo) groups. N (nasal flunisolide) was significantly more effective than O or P (P less than or equal to 0.005) for each symptom for at least one 2-week period. Global evaluation demonstrated control of overall hayfever severity for N (nasal flunisolide) but not for O (oral flunisolide). We conclude that the therapeutic efficacy of flunisolide is achieved by topical and not by systemic action.
鼻内用氟尼缩松是治疗变应性鼻炎的一种有效药物。给正常受试者使用时,氟尼缩松具有高生物利用度(鼻内给药剂量的50%进入体循环),且全身作用极小。活动性鼻炎患者的生物利用度平均为62.4±15.7%。鼻内给药100微克时,与之生物等效的口服剂量为500微克。为了明确鼻内用氟尼缩松在活动性变应性鼻炎患者中的对比试验及全身作用,在1983年豚草花粉热季节进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。99例豚草花粉热病史≥2年且豚草点刺皮肤试验阳性的患者被随机分配至三个治疗组之一:0组 = 口服氟尼缩松500微克,每日2次,鼻内用安慰剂,每日2次;N组 = 每侧鼻孔鼻内用氟尼缩松50微克,每日2次,口服安慰剂,每日2次;P组 = 鼻内和口服安慰剂,每日2次。治疗持续4周。患者记录每日症状评分。每2周由一名盲法观察者对患者进行评估,并在研究结束时进行整体评估。对每个中心的数据进行分析并汇总。0组(口服氟尼缩松)和P组(安慰剂)在打喷嚏、鼻塞和喉咙瘙痒的症状严重程度方面无显著差异。在至少一个2周期间,N组(鼻内用氟尼缩松)对每种症状的疗效均显著优于0组或P组(P≤0.005)。整体评估显示,N组(鼻内用氟尼缩松)对总体花粉热严重程度有控制作用,而0组(口服氟尼缩松)则无。我们得出结论,氟尼缩松的治疗效果是通过局部作用而非全身作用实现的。