Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e084925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084925.
Despite participating in scenario training, many medical first responders (MFRs) perceive themselves as inadequately prepared to respond to mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive examination of traditional MCI scenario training methods, focusing on their inherent strengths and limitations. An investigation into the perceptions of MFRs who had participated in MCI scenario training was carried out to identify potential areas for improvement and provide recommendations for refining MCI training protocols.
Qualitative inductive approach using semistructured interviews that took place between October 2021 and February 2022. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis.
MCI scenario training involving four organisations (three emergency medical services and one search-and-rescue organisation) tasked with responding to MCIs, collectively representing four European Union countries.
27 MFRs (17 emergency medical services personnel and 10 search-and-rescue volunteers) were recruited to participate in the study.
Two categories and seven associated subcategories (shown in parentheses) were identified as influencing the learning outcomes for MFRs: Training in a context mirroring real-world incidents (conducting incident scene risk assessment, realistic representation in casualties, incorporating scenario variety into the curriculum, interagency collaboration, role alignment when training incident site management) and use of a pedagogical framework (allowing for mistakes, the importance of post-training evaluation).
This study reaffirms the value of traditional MCI scenario training and identifies areas for enhancement, advocating for realistic scenarios, interagency collaboration, improved incident site management skills and thorough post-training evaluation. It suggests a shift in MCI training conceptualisation and delivery. The potential of virtual reality technologies as a valuable addition to training methods is explored, with a note on the need for further research to ascertain the long-term effectiveness of these technologies. However, the selection of a training method should consider programme goals, target population and resources.
尽管许多医疗急救人员(MFR)参与了情景模拟训练,但他们仍认为自己对大规模伤亡事件(MCIs)的应对准备不足。本研究的目的是全面检查传统的 MCI 情景模拟训练方法,重点分析其固有优势和局限性。通过调查参与过 MCI 情景模拟训练的 MFR 的看法,确定了潜在的改进领域,并为完善 MCI 培训方案提供了建议。
采用半结构化访谈的定性归纳方法,访谈于 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 2 月进行。采用定性内容分析法对数据进行分析。
四家机构(三家紧急医疗服务机构和一家搜救机构)参与的 MCI 情景模拟训练,共同代表四个欧盟国家。
共招募了 27 名 MFR(17 名紧急医疗服务人员和 10 名搜救志愿者)参与本研究。
确定了两个类别和七个相关亚类别(括号中显示),这些类别和亚类别影响着 MFR 的学习成果:在与实际事件相匹配的情境中进行培训(进行事件现场风险评估、伤员的真实表现、将情景多样性纳入课程、机构间合作、培训事件现场管理时的角色定位)和使用教学框架(允许犯错、培训后评估的重要性)。
本研究再次证实了传统 MCI 情景模拟训练的价值,并确定了增强训练的领域,倡导使用真实场景、机构间合作、改进事件现场管理技能和进行彻底的培训后评估。这表明 MCI 培训概念和实施方式正在发生转变。探讨了虚拟现实技术作为培训方法的有益补充的可能性,并指出需要进一步研究以确定这些技术的长期效果。然而,培训方法的选择应考虑项目目标、目标人群和资源。