Schulz Fredrik, Hultin Magnus, Gyllencreutz Lina
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 27;15(3):e098284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098284.
Measuring the effectiveness of mass casualty incident (MCI) scenario training is challenging due to simultaneously assessing individual skills, team dynamics, decision-making under pressure and adaptability. Existing instruments often focus too narrowly on individual skills, overlooking the comprehensive range of skills needed for effective prehospital disaster response. This study aims to develop and validate a comprehensive self-assessment tool for prehospital disaster response skills during initial MCI scenario training.
The instrument was developed and validated using a comprehensive methodology. This included literature reviews to identify the construct, ensuring content validity through expert evaluation and conducting field trials in MCI scenario training to evaluate the instrument under simulated conditions that approximated real-life incidents. The instrument's psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Horn's parallel analysis, as well as Cronbach's α and item-total correlation analysis.
Two field trials conducted with participants in Sweden during 2023 and 2024.
75 students from a bachelor's programme at a Swedish university were recruited to participate in the field trials. The programme featured one semester of comprehensive theoretical and practical training in disaster medicine, including MCI response and management. 88 instruments were collected during the field trials.
Overall Cronbach's α score was 0.86, indicating high internal consistency for the instrument. EFA and Horn's parallel analysis revealed a five-factor model accounting for 52.3% of the total variance: ; and . Cronbach's α for all factors indicated good internal consistency (range: 0.74-0.85).
The instrument addresses a critical gap by offering a comprehensive self-evaluation tool for disaster response skills. The robust psychometric properties indicate its potential for practical implication. Future studies should explore its application in diverse training settings and populations to enhance its utility and generalisability.A comprehensive development and validation methodology ensured the high content validity of the instrument.
由于要同时评估个人技能、团队动态、压力下的决策能力和适应能力,衡量大规模伤亡事件(MCI)情景训练的效果具有挑战性。现有工具往往过于狭隘地关注个人技能,而忽视了有效的院前灾难应对所需的全面技能范围。本研究旨在开发并验证一种用于初始MCI情景训练期间院前灾难应对技能的综合自我评估工具。
该工具采用综合方法进行开发和验证。这包括进行文献综述以确定结构,通过专家评估确保内容效度,并在MCI情景训练中进行现场试验,以在近似真实事件的模拟条件下评估该工具。使用探索性因素分析(EFA)和霍恩平行分析以及克朗巴赫α系数和项目-总分相关分析来评估该工具的心理测量特性。
2023年和2024年在瑞典对参与者进行了两次现场试验。
招募了瑞典一所大学本科课程的75名学生参加现场试验。该课程包括一个学期的灾难医学综合理论和实践培训,包括MCI应对和管理。在现场试验期间收集了88份工具。
总体克朗巴赫α系数得分为0.86,表明该工具具有较高的内部一致性。EFA和霍恩平行分析揭示了一个五因素模型,占总方差的52.3%:;以及。所有因素的克朗巴赫α系数均表明具有良好的内部一致性(范围:0.74 - 0.85)。
该工具通过提供一种用于灾难应对技能的综合自我评估工具,填补了一个关键空白。强大的心理测量特性表明其具有实际应用潜力。未来的研究应探索其在不同训练环境和人群中的应用,以提高其效用和普遍性。一种综合的开发和验证方法确保了该工具的高内容效度。