Sandra Rosenbaum School of Social Work and Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Sep;8(9):1676-1688. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01922-8. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
US consumers may turn to the private market for credit when income and government benefits fall short. The most vulnerable consumers have access only to the highest-cost loans. Prior research on trade-offs of credit with government welfare support cannot distinguish between distinct forms of unsecured credit due to data limitations. Here we provide insight on credit-welfare state trade-offs vis-à-vis unemployment insurance generosity by leveraging a large sample of credit data that allow us to separate credit cards, personal loans and alternative financial services loans and to analyse heterogeneity in credit use by household income. We find that more generous state unemployment insurance benefits were associated with a lower probability of high-cost credit use during the first seven quarters of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This inverse association was concentrated among consumers living in low-income households. Our results support theories that public benefits are inversely associated with the use of costly credit.
当收入和政府福利不足时,美国消费者可能会转向私人市场获取信贷。最脆弱的消费者只能获得成本最高的贷款。由于数据限制,先前关于信贷与政府福利支持权衡的研究无法区分不同形式的无担保信贷。在这里,我们通过利用大量信贷数据来洞察信贷-福利国家权衡与失业保险慷慨程度之间的关系,这些数据使我们能够将信用卡、个人贷款和另类金融服务贷款分开,并分析家庭收入不同的信贷使用情况。我们发现,在 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 大流行的前七个季度,更慷慨的州失业保险福利与使用高成本信贷的可能性降低有关。这种反比关系集中在生活在低收入家庭的消费者中。我们的结果支持这样一种理论,即公共福利与昂贵信贷的使用呈反比关系。