• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑和压力如何影响足球裁判?一项事件相关电位研究。

How do anxiety and stress affect soccer referees? An ERPs study.

作者信息

Zhang Li, Shi Haonan, Zhang Hongfei, Ding Jianlan, Wang Zilong

机构信息

School of Marxism, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

School of Sports Economics and Sports Management, Xi'an Physical Education University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1294864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1294864. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1294864
PMID:38993335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11236741/
Abstract

The decision-making of soccer referees is one of the typical forms influenced by factors such as environmental pressure and individual emotions. While previous studies have explored how common factors like personal anxiety and on-field pressure affect the decisions of soccer referees, the mechanisms by which anxiety influences decision-making under pressure remain unclear. This study developed a penalty task based on real soccer match scenarios and recruited 76 experienced soccer referees. These referees were divided into two groups, high anxiety and low anxiety, based on their anxiety levels, to perform decision-making tasks under different pressure environments simulated to mimic real matches. Additionally, this research employed Event-Related Potential (ERP) technology to compare the brain signals of soccer referees with different levels of anxiety when facing foul play under various pressure environments. It was found that referees with high levels of anxiety displayed larger P300 and N400 amplitudes in a low-pressure environment ( = 0.0059,  = 2.9437). However, no significant differences in P300 and N400 amplitudes were observed between referees with high and low levels of anxiety under high-pressure conditions ( = 0.1890,  = 1.3411). This study not only reveals the complex mechanisms of anxiety in the decision-making process of referees but also emphasizes the importance of understanding and managing the psychological state of referees in competitive sports to improve the quality of their decisions. Our findings provide an empirical basis for future efforts to mitigate the impact of anxiety and optimize the decision-making process in similar high-pressure environments.

摘要

足球裁判的决策是受环境压力和个人情绪等因素影响的典型形式之一。虽然以往的研究探讨了个人焦虑和场上压力等常见因素如何影响足球裁判的决策,但焦虑在压力下影响决策的机制仍不清楚。本研究基于真实足球比赛场景开发了一项判罚任务,并招募了76名经验丰富的足球裁判。这些裁判根据焦虑水平分为高焦虑组和低焦虑组,在模拟真实比赛的不同压力环境下执行决策任务。此外,本研究采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术,比较不同焦虑水平的足球裁判在不同压力环境下面对犯规行为时的脑电信号。研究发现,高焦虑水平的裁判在低压环境下P300和N400波幅更大( = 0.0059, = 2.9437)。然而,在高压条件下,高焦虑水平和低焦虑水平的裁判之间未观察到P300和N400波幅的显著差异( = 0.1890, = 1.3411)。本研究不仅揭示了焦虑在裁判决策过程中的复杂机制,还强调了在竞技体育中理解和管理裁判心理状态以提高其决策质量的重要性。我们的研究结果为未来减轻焦虑影响和优化类似高压环境下决策过程的努力提供了实证依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/a3533e35c8dd/fpsyg-15-1294864-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/9e4650134f78/fpsyg-15-1294864-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/3556366249e5/fpsyg-15-1294864-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/96715eefa4c9/fpsyg-15-1294864-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/55a7eeddb637/fpsyg-15-1294864-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/09b49c65b61c/fpsyg-15-1294864-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/a3533e35c8dd/fpsyg-15-1294864-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/9e4650134f78/fpsyg-15-1294864-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/3556366249e5/fpsyg-15-1294864-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/96715eefa4c9/fpsyg-15-1294864-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/55a7eeddb637/fpsyg-15-1294864-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/09b49c65b61c/fpsyg-15-1294864-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc6/11236741/a3533e35c8dd/fpsyg-15-1294864-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
How do anxiety and stress affect soccer referees? An ERPs study.焦虑和压力如何影响足球裁判?一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1294864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1294864. eCollection 2024.
2
Influence of physical and psychological stress on decision-making performance of soccer referees.生理和心理压力对足球裁判决策表现的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2022 Sep;40(18):2037-2046. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2127516. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
3
Activity Profiles of Top-Class Players and Referees and Accuracy in Foul Decision-Making During Korean National League Soccer Games.顶级球员和裁判的活动特征以及韩国职业足球联赛中犯规决策的准确性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Sep;33(9):2530-2540. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003083.
4
Influence Mechanism of the Home Advantage on Referees' Decision-Making in Modern Football Field - A Study From Sports Neuro-Decision Science.主场优势对现代足球场裁判判罚决策的影响机制——一项基于运动神经决策科学的研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 11;13:873184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873184. eCollection 2022.
5
A Preliminary Analysis of the Importance of Distance, Angle, and Insight When Soccer Referees Make Penalty Decisions.足球裁判做出点球判罚时距离、角度和洞察力重要性的初步分析
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jan 8;2:595703. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.595703. eCollection 2020.
6
Science and medicine applied to soccer refereeing: an update.科学和医学在足球裁判中的应用:最新进展。
Sports Med. 2012 Jul 1;42(7):615-31. doi: 10.2165/11632360-000000000-00000.
7
Faster, more accurate, more confident? An exploratory experiment on soccer referees' yellow card decision-making.更快、更准确、更有信心?一项关于足球裁判出示黄牌判罚决策的探索性实验。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1415170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415170. eCollection 2024.
8
Soccer Referee Decision-Making: 'shall I Blow the Whistle?'.足球裁判决策:“我应该鸣哨吗?”
J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Jun 1;5(2):243-53. eCollection 2006.
9
Effect of positioning on the accuracy of decision making of association football top-class referees and assistant referees during competitive matches.定位对顶级足球裁判员和助理裁判员在竞技比赛中决策准确性的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(13):1437-45. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.711485. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
10
Does slow motion impact on the perception of foul play in football?慢动作会影响对足球比赛中犯规动作的判罚吗?
Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Jul;17(6):748-756. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1304580. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploration of public stereotypes of supply-and-demand characteristics of recycled water infrastructure - Evidence from an event-related potential experiment in Xi'an, China.公众对再生水基础设施供需特征刻板印象的探索——来自中国西安事件相关电位实验的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:116103. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116103. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Pressing Crowd Noise Impairs the Ability of Anxious Basketball Referees to Discriminate Fouls.嘈杂的人群压力会削弱焦虑的篮球裁判辨别犯规的能力。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 21;10:2380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02380. eCollection 2019.
3
Stress and the brain: individual variability and the inverted-U.
压力与大脑:个体差异与倒U形关系
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Oct;18(10):1344-6. doi: 10.1038/nn.4109.
4
Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal.大脑估值信号置信度的自动整合。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Aug;18(8):1159-67. doi: 10.1038/nn.4064. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
Disorders of compulsivity: a common bias towards learning habits.强迫性障碍:对学习习惯的一种常见偏好。
Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;20(3):345-52. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.44. Epub 2014 May 20.
6
Effects of confidence and anxiety on flow state in competition.自信心和焦虑感对比赛中流畅状态的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(5):543-50. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2012.746731. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
7
Cognitive control of auditory distraction: impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account.听觉分心的认知控制:任务难度、预知和工作记忆容量的影响支持双机制假说。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):539-53. doi: 10.1037/a0029064. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
8
Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).三十年的探索:事件相关脑电位(ERP)中 N400 成分的意义发现。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
9
States versus rewards: dissociable neural prediction error signals underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning.状态与奖励:基于模型和无模型强化学习的分离神经预测误差信号。
Neuron. 2010 May 27;66(4):585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.016.
10
Choking vs. clutch performance: a study of sport performance under pressure.窒息与离合器表现:压力下的运动表现研究。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009 Oct;31(5):583-601. doi: 10.1123/jsep.31.5.583.