Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Int Wound J. 2024 Jul;21(7):e14964. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14964.
Negative pressure wound therapy is currently one of the most popular treatment approaches that provide a series of benefits to facilitate healing, including increased local blood perfusion with reduced localized oedema and control of wound exudate. The porous foam dressing is a critical element in the application of this therapy and its choice is based on its ability to manage exudate. Industry standards often employ aqueous solutions devoid of proteins to assess dressing performance. However, such standardized tests fail to capture the intricate dynamics of real wounds, oversimplifying the evaluation process. This study aims to evaluate the technical characteristics of two different commercial polyurethane foam dressings during negative pressure wound therapy. We introduce an innovative experimental model designed to evaluate the effects of this therapy on foam dressings in the presence of viscous exudates. Our findings reveal a proportional increase in dressing fibre occupancy as pressure intensifies, leading to a reduction in dressing pore size. The tests underscore the pressure system's diminished efficacy in fluid extraction with increasing fluid viscosity. Our discussion points to the need of establishing standardized guidelines for foam dressing selection based on pore size and the necessity of incorporating real biological exudates into industrial standards.
负压伤口治疗目前是最受欢迎的治疗方法之一,它为伤口愈合提供了一系列益处,包括增加局部血液灌注、减少局部水肿和控制伤口渗出物。多孔泡沫敷料是该治疗应用的关键组成部分,其选择基于其管理渗出物的能力。行业标准通常采用不含蛋白质的水溶液来评估敷料性能。然而,这种标准化测试未能捕捉到真实伤口的复杂动态,使评估过程过于简单化。本研究旨在评估两种不同商业聚氨酯泡沫敷料在负压伤口治疗中的技术特性。我们引入了一种创新的实验模型,旨在评估在存在粘性渗出物的情况下,这种治疗方法对泡沫敷料的影响。我们的研究结果表明,随着压力的增加,敷料纤维的占有率呈比例增加,导致敷料孔径减小。测试强调了随着流体粘度的增加,压力系统在提取流体方面的效果降低。我们的讨论指出,需要根据孔径大小为泡沫敷料选择制定标准化指南,并将真实生物渗出物纳入工业标准。