• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马拉维部分护理学校护生学习方法的横断面研究。

Nursing students' approaches to learning in selected Malawian nursing schools: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Rumphi District Hospital, P.O Box 225, Rumphi, Malawi.

School of Nursing, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05746-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05746-y
PMID:38997697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11245808/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Students' approaches to learning are of essence in nursing education. This is because nursing is a profession where classroom learning leads to clinical performance. Although the literature recognizes student's approaches to learning as a significant aspect affecting the quality of students' learning, studies suggest that quality of learning has not been highly achieved in Malawian nursing colleges. Currently, there is a scarcity of empirical data on the learning approaches that Malawian nursing and midwifery students in nursing colleges employ. This study assessed the different approaches to learning among nursing and midwifery students in selected Malawian nursing colleges.

METHODS

This was a cross- sectional study that employed quantitative methods. The target population was nursing and midwifery students pursuing nursing diplomas from Nkhoma College of Nursing, Ekwendeni College of Health Sciences and Malawi College of Health Sciences. A total of 251 students were sampled randomly from the three nursing colleges. Data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire (R-SPQ-2 F) by Biggs. The data was analyzed using chi-square and binary logistic regression. In this study Cronbach's alpha was 0.6.

RESULTS

Most students had used a deep approach to learning (M = 3.201, SD = 0.623) than the surface approach (M = 2.757, SD = 0.732). Being in the age category of 16-20 had more likelihood of adopting a surface approach to learning compared to other age categories (X = 7.669, DF 2, P = .02). Students from Malawi College of Health Sciences were more likely to adopt a surface approach to learning compared to students from Nkhoma Nursing College and Ekwendeni College of Health Sciences (X = 12.388, df = 2, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

A deep approach to learning emerged as the most preferred approach to learning which indirectly implies that most students attain meaningful learning. Age and environment are some of the key determinants associated with different learning approaches. More attention should be given to younger students during teaching and learning to promote deep learning.

摘要

背景

学生的学习方法在护理教育中至关重要。这是因为护理是一门课堂学习与临床表现密切相关的职业。尽管文献认为学生的学习方法是影响学生学习质量的重要方面,但研究表明,马拉维护理学院的学习质量并未得到高度重视。目前,关于马拉维护理和助产专业学生在护理学院所采用的学习方法,缺乏实证数据。本研究评估了选定马拉维护理学院护理和助产专业学生的不同学习方法。

方法

这是一项采用定量方法的横断面研究。研究对象为来自恩科韦恩迪健康科学学院、姆祖祖护理学院和马拉维健康科学学院的护理文凭学生。从这三所护理学院中,共随机抽取了 251 名学生进行抽样。通过比格斯的自我管理问卷(R-SPQ-2 F)收集数据。使用卡方检验和二元逻辑回归分析数据。在这项研究中,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.6。

结果

大多数学生采用了深度学习方法(M=3.201,SD=0.623),而不是表面学习方法(M=2.757,SD=0.732)。与其他年龄组相比,16-20 岁年龄组更有可能采用表面学习方法(X=7.669,DF 2,P=0.02)。与姆祖祖护理学院和恩科韦恩迪健康科学学院的学生相比,马拉维健康科学学院的学生更有可能采用表面学习方法(X=12.388,df=2,P=0.002)。

结论

深度学习方法成为最受欢迎的学习方法,这间接表明大多数学生都能获得有意义的学习。年龄和环境是与不同学习方法相关的一些关键决定因素。在教学过程中,应更加关注年轻学生,以促进深度学习。

相似文献

1
Nursing students' approaches to learning in selected Malawian nursing schools: a cross-sectional study.马拉维部分护理学校护生学习方法的横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05746-y.
2
Nursing and midwifery students' approaches to study and learning.护理与助产专业学生的学习方法与途径。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 May;54(3):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03814.x.
3
Learning approach among health sciences students in a medical college in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.尼泊尔一所医学院校健康科学专业学生的学习方法:一项横断面研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Mar 4;7:137-43. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S100968. eCollection 2016.
4
Nepalese undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teachers: A questionnaire survey.尼泊尔本科护理专业学生对临床学习环境、督导及护士教师的看法:一项问卷调查
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Clustering clinical learning environment and mentoring perceptions of nursing and midwifery students: A cross-sectional study.护理与助产学学生临床学习环境和指导感知的聚类分析:一项横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2336-2347. doi: 10.1111/jan.14452. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
The roles and experiences of preceptors in clinical teaching of undergraduate nursing and midwifery students in Malawi.马拉维本科护理和助产学学生临床教学中导师的角色和经验。
Malawi Med J. 2021 Apr;33(Postgraduate Supplementary Iss):35-39. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v33iS.7.
7
Educational environment and approaches to learning of undergraduate nursing students in an Indonesian school of nursing.印度尼西亚一所护理学院本科护理学生的教育环境与学习方法
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Nov;14(6):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
8
Nursing students' perceptions of using the Clinical Education Assessment tool AssCE and their overall perceptions of the clinical learning environment - A cross-sectional correlational study.护理专业学生对使用临床教育评估工具AssCE的看法及其对临床学习环境的总体看法——一项横断面相关性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Apr;51:63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
9
The effects of undergraduate nursing student-faculty interaction outside the classroom on college grade point average.本科护生课堂外师生互动对大学平均绩点的影响。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2011 Sep;11(5):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
10
Informing the medical education reform in Tajikistan: evidence on the learning environment at two nursing colleges.为塔吉克斯坦的医学教育改革提供信息:两所护理学院学习环境的证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1515-0.

本文引用的文献

1
A deep learning approach to student registered nurse anesthetist (SRNA) education.一种用于学生注册护士麻醉师(SRNA)教育的深度学习方法。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2021 Jun 24;18(1):ijnes-2020-0068. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2020-0068.
2
Investigating the learning approaches of students in nursing education.探究护理教育中学生的学习方法。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Nov 10;16(1):43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.10.008. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Patterns of Change in Approaches to Learning and Their Impact on Academic Performance Among Medical Students: Longitudinal Analysis.医学生学习方法的变化模式及其对学业成绩的影响:纵向分析
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Apr-May;33(2):173-183. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1814295. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
What educators could do to facilitate students' use of a deep approach to learning: A multisite cross-sectional design.教育工作者可以采取哪些措施来促进学生深入学习:一项多地点横断面设计。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104422. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104422. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
5
Transforming Nursing Education to Strengthen Health System in Malawi: An Exploratory Study.转变护理教育以加强马拉维的卫生系统:一项探索性研究。
Open Nurs J. 2018 May 31;12:93-105. doi: 10.2174/1874434601812010093. eCollection 2018.
6
The predominant learning approaches of medical students.医学生的主要学习方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1122-5.
7
Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: a cross-cultural study.研究方法对本科职业治疗专业学生学业成绩的预测作用:一项跨文化研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 2;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3.
8
Approaches to learning among occupational therapy undergraduate students: A cross-cultural study.职业治疗专业本科学生的学习方法:一项跨文化研究。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2017 Jul;24(4):299-310. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2016.1229811. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Learning environment, approaches to learning and learning preferences: medical students versus general education students.学习环境、学习方法和学习偏好:医学生与普通教育学生的比较
J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 May;66(5):541-4.
10
Exam Success at Undergraduate and Graduate-Entry Medical Schools: Is Learning Style or Learning Approach More Important? A Critical Review Exploring Links Between Academic Success, Learning Styles, and Learning Approaches Among School-Leaver Entry ("Traditional") and Graduate-Entry ("Nontraditional") Medical Students.本科及研究生入学医学院的考试成功:学习风格还是学习方法更重要?一项批判性综述,探讨离校生入学(“传统”)和研究生入学(“非传统”)医学生的学业成功、学习风格与学习方法之间的联系。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(3):237-44. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1046734.