• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脊髓损伤的范围取决于损伤水平并可预测恢复情况:一项多中心神经影像学研究

Extent of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Is Lesion Level Dependent and Predictive of Recovery: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study.

作者信息

Schading-Sassenhausen Simon, Pfyffer Dario, Farner Lynn, Grillhösl Andreas, Mach Orpheus, Maier Doris, Grassner Lukas, Leister Iris, Curt Armin, Freund Patrick

机构信息

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep;41(17-18):2146-2157. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0555. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0555
PMID:39001825
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12054703/
Abstract

Assessing the extent of the intramedullary lesion after spinal cord injury (SCI) might help to improve prognostication. However, because the neurological level of injury impacts the recovery potential of SCI patients, the question arises whether lesion size parameters and predictive models based on those parameters are affected as well. In this retrospective observational study, the extent of the intramedullary lesion between individuals who sustained cervical and thoracolumbar SCI was compared, and its relation to clinical recovery was assessed. In total, 154 patients with subacute SCI (89 individuals with cervical lesions and 65 individuals with thoracolumbar lesions) underwent conventional clinical magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after injury and clinical examination at 1 and 12 months. The morphology of the focal lesion within the spinal cord was manually assessed on the midsagittal slice of T-weighted magnetic resonance images and compared between cervical and thoracolumbar SCI patients, as well as between patients who improved at least one American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade (converters) and patients without AIS grade improvement (nonconverters). The predictive value of lesion parameters including lesion length, lesion width, and preserved tissue bridges for predicting AIS grade conversion was assessed using regression models (conditional inference tree analysis). Lesion length was two times longer in thoracolumbar compared with cervical SCI patients (F = 39.48, < 0.0001), whereas lesion width and tissue bridges width did not differ. When comparing AIS grade converters and nonconverters, converters showed a smaller lesion length (F = 5.46, = 0.021), a smaller lesion width (F = 13.75, = 0.0003), and greater tissue bridges (F = 12.87, = 0.0005). Using regression models, tissue bridges allowed more refined subgrouping of patients in AIS groups B, C, and D according to individual recovery profiles between 1 month and 12 months after SCI, whereas lesion length added no additional information for further subgrouping. This study characterizes differences in the anteroposterior and craniocaudal lesion extents after SCI. The two times greater lesion length in thoracolumbar compared with cervical SCI might be related to differences in the anatomy, biomechanics, and perfusion between the cervical and thoracic spines. Preserved tissue bridges were less influenced by the lesion level while closely related to the clinical impairment. These results highlight the robustness and utility of tissue bridges as a neuroimaging biomarker for predicting the clinical outcome after SCI in heterogeneous patient populations and for patient stratification in clinical trials.

摘要

评估脊髓损伤(SCI)后髓内病变的范围可能有助于改善预后。然而,由于损伤的神经平面会影响SCI患者的恢复潜力,因此产生了一个问题,即病变大小参数以及基于这些参数的预测模型是否也会受到影响。在这项回顾性观察研究中,比较了颈髓和胸腰段SCI患者的髓内病变范围,并评估了其与临床恢复的关系。共有154例亚急性SCI患者(89例颈髓损伤患者和65例胸腰段损伤患者)在受伤1个月后接受了传统临床磁共振成像检查,并在1个月和12个月时进行了临床检查。在T加权磁共振图像的矢状中切面上手动评估脊髓内局灶性病变的形态,并在颈髓和胸腰段SCI患者之间以及至少改善了一个美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级(AIS)级别的患者(转换者)和AIS分级未改善的患者(非转换者)之间进行比较。使用回归模型(条件推断树分析)评估包括病变长度、病变宽度和保留的组织桥在内的病变参数对预测AIS分级转换的预测价值。胸腰段SCI患者的病变长度是颈髓SCI患者的两倍(F = 39.48,P < 0.0001),而病变宽度和组织桥宽度没有差异。在比较AIS分级转换者和非转换者时,转换者的病变长度较小(F = 5.46,P = 0.021),病变宽度较小(F = 13.75,P = 0.0003),组织桥较大(F = 12.87,P = 0.0005)。使用回归模型,组织桥能够根据SCI后1个月至12个月之间的个体恢复情况,对AIS B、C和D组的患者进行更精细的亚组划分,而病变长度并未为进一步亚组划分提供额外信息。本研究描述了SCI后前后和头尾方向病变范围的差异。胸腰段SCI患者的病变长度比颈髓SCI患者大两倍,这可能与颈椎和胸椎在解剖学、生物力学和灌注方面的差异有关。保留的组织桥受病变平面的影响较小,而与临床损伤密切相关。这些结果突出了组织桥作为一种神经影像生物标志物在预测异质性患者群体SCI后的临床结局以及在临床试验中对患者进行分层方面的稳健性和实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/a9505bdde591/neu.2023.0555_figure5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/d70ce3a82b00/neu.2023.0555_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/100a82795b57/neu.2023.0555_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/2dffed001567/neu.2023.0555_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/59d87c025e07/neu.2023.0555_figure4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/a9505bdde591/neu.2023.0555_figure5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/d70ce3a82b00/neu.2023.0555_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/100a82795b57/neu.2023.0555_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/2dffed001567/neu.2023.0555_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/59d87c025e07/neu.2023.0555_figure4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202a/12054703/a9505bdde591/neu.2023.0555_figure5.jpg

相似文献

1
Extent of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Is Lesion Level Dependent and Predictive of Recovery: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study.创伤性脊髓损伤的范围取决于损伤水平并可预测恢复情况:一项多中心神经影像学研究
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep;41(17-18):2146-2157. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0555. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Midsagittal Tissue Bridges as Predictors of Neurological Recovery in Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.矢状位中间组织桥作为创伤性颈脊髓损伤神经功能恢复的预测指标
World Neurosurg. 2025 Apr 7;198:123963. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123963.
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Subacute Phase after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective, Observational Longitudinal Study. Part 1: Conventional Imaging Characteristics.创伤性颈脊髓损伤亚急性期的磁共振成像参数:一项前瞻性观察性纵向研究。第1部分:传统成像特征。
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Feb;42(3-4):307-315. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0592. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Development of a machine learning model and a web application for predicting neurological outcome at hospital discharge in spinal cord injury patients.开发用于预测脊髓损伤患者出院时神经功能结局的机器学习模型和网络应用程序。
Spine J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.005.
5
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
6
The Role of Motor Zones of Partial Preservation in Conversion From Initially Complete to Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.部分保留运动区在脊髓损伤从最初的完全性向运动不完全性转变中的作用
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul;106(7):1053-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.473. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
7
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
8
Unique features of pediatric spinal cord injury.小儿脊髓损伤的独特特征。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21 Suppl):S202-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f35acb.
9
Assessing and validating machine learning-enhanced imputation of admission American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades for spinal cord injury.评估并验证机器学习增强的脊髓损伤患者入院时美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级量表评分的插补法
J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 May 9;43(1):90-97. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241135. Print 2025 Jul 1.
10
Acute Implantation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Scaffold in Patients With Complete Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial (INSPIRE 2.0).生物可吸收聚合物支架在完全性胸段脊髓损伤患者中的急性植入:一项随机对照试验(INSPIRE 2.0)。
Neurosurgery. 2025 Apr 1;96(4):751-762. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003180. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Tissue bridges offer valuable insights into bladder and bowel outcomes in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.组织桥接为慢性颈脊髓损伤患者的膀胱和肠道预后提供了有价值的见解。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09322-w.
2
Impact of early decompression surgery and injury characteristics on neurological recovery following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.早期减压手术及损伤特征对创伤性颈脊髓损伤后神经功能恢复的影响
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 10;5:104326. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104326. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of tissue bridges in cervical spinal cord injury: a longitudinal, multicentre, retrospective cohort study.组织桥在颈脊髓损伤中的预后价值:一项纵向、多中心、回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Aug;23(8):816-825. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00173-X. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: a large population-based study.创伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学:一项基于大人群的研究。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Sep;60(9):812-819. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00795-w. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
Characterizing Natural Recovery of People With Initial Motor Complete Tetraplegia.
描述初始运动完全性四肢瘫痪患者的自然康复情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):649-656. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
4
Improving Diagnostic Workup Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Advances in Biomarkers.创伤性脊髓损伤后诊断检查的改进:生物标志物的进展
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Jul 16;21(9):49. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01134-x.
5
Unbiased Recursive Partitioning Enables Robust and Reliable Outcome Prediction in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.无偏递归分区可实现急性脊髓损伤的稳健可靠的预后预测。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Feb;39(3-4):266-276. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7407. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Outcomes of Spinal Cord Injury: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.脊髓损伤的结局:世界神经外科联合会脊柱委员会建议
Neurospine. 2020 Dec;17(4):809-819. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040490.245. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
7
Characterizing Natural Recovery after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.描述外伤性脊髓损伤后的自然康复情况。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 1;38(9):1267-1284. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7473. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
The neuroanatomical-functional paradox in spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤的神经解剖-功能悖论。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2021 Jan;17(1):53-62. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-00436-x. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
Predictive Value of Midsagittal Tissue Bridges on Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤后中矢状组织桥对功能恢复的预测价值。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Jan;35(1):33-43. doi: 10.1177/1545968320971787. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
10
Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland.芬兰外伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jul;59(7):761-768. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00575-4. Epub 2020 Nov 4.