Nelson Katie E, Adams Kathleen, Kahn-John Michelle, Davidson Patricia M, Ferrell Betty, Meah Mumtahana, Petchler Claire, Ricker Adriann, Runsabove Kassie, Werk Alicia, Wright Rebecca, Brockie Teresa N
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Fort Belknap Tribal Health Department, Harlem, Montana, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1437-1449. doi: 10.1111/jan.16324. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
To explore (1) perspectives and attitudes of Native Americans regarding transitions from serious illness to death, and (2) awareness about hospice and palliative care service models in a Great Plains reservation-based community.
Qualitative descriptive study.
Community members and clinicians were invited to participate in a semi-structured focus group or interview by Tribal Advisory Board members. Analysis involved three phases: (1) qualitative descriptive analysis of preliminary themes using the Addressing Palliative Care Disparities conceptual model; (2) a cultural review of the data; and (3) reflexive thematic analysis to synthesize findings.
Twenty-six participants engaged in two focus groups (n = 5-6 participants in each) and interviews (n = 15). Four themes were derived from their stories: (1) family connectedness is always priority; (2) end-of-life support is a community-wide effort; (3) everyone must grieve in their own way to heal; and (4) support needs from outside the community.
Findings highlight cultural considerations spanning the life course. Clinicians, researchers and traditional wisdom keepers and practitioners, particularly those working in rural and/or reservation-based settings, must provide culturally safe care. This must include acknowledging and prioritizing the needs and preferences of Native American patients and the impact on their families and communities.
Leveraging community assets, such as family and social networks, is key for supporting Native American patients with serious illnesses. Additionally, facilitating greater family and caregiver involvement along a patient's care trajectory may be a pathway for easing health care workers' caseloads in reservation-based areas, where resources are limited.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guideline was used.
PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study was ideated based on community insight. Tribal Advisory Board members oversaw all aspects including recruitment, data acquisition, interpretation of findings and tribal data dissemination.
探讨(1)美国原住民对从重病到死亡转变的看法和态度,以及(2)大平原保留地社区对临终关怀和姑息治疗服务模式的认知。
定性描述性研究。
部落咨询委员会成员邀请社区成员和临床医生参加半结构化焦点小组或访谈。分析包括三个阶段:(1)使用解决姑息治疗差异概念模型对初步主题进行定性描述分析;(2)对数据进行文化审查;(3)进行反思性主题分析以综合研究结果。
26名参与者参加了两个焦点小组(每个小组有5 - 6名参与者)和访谈(15人)。从他们的故事中得出了四个主题:(1)家庭联系始终是首要任务;(2)临终支持是全社区的努力;(3)每个人都必须以自己的方式悲伤才能痊愈;(4)需要社区外部的支持。
研究结果强调了贯穿生命历程的文化考量。临床医生、研究人员以及传统智慧传承者和从业者,尤其是在农村和/或基于保留地环境中工作的人员,必须提供文化上安全的护理。这必须包括承认并优先考虑美国原住民患者的需求和偏好以及对其家庭和社区的影响。
利用家庭和社会网络等社区资产是支持患有重病的美国原住民患者的关键。此外,在资源有限的基于保留地的地区,促进家庭和护理人员在患者护理轨迹中更多地参与,可能是减轻医护人员工作量的一条途径。
采用了定性研究报告的综合标准(COREQ)指南。
患者/公众贡献:该研究基于社区见解构思而成。部落咨询委员会成员监督了包括招募、数据收集、研究结果解读和部落数据传播在内的所有方面。