• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Role of the health literacy assessment in healthcare: Content validation of "Health Literacy Behaviour" nursing outcome.健康素养评估在医疗保健中的作用:“健康素养行为”护理结果的内容效度
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Jul;36(3):264-274. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12482. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
5
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.基于算法的养老院痴呆患者疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
6
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
7
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants.改善移民健康素养的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 14;11(11):CD013303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013303.pub2.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Content and Clinical Validation of the Nursing Outcome "Health Literacy Behaviour": A Validation Protocol.护理结果“健康素养行为”的内容与临床验证:一项验证方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;11(4):481. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040481.
2
Validation of Nursing Outcomes Classification: Knowledge and Self-management for Cardiac Disease.护理结局分类的验证:心脏病的知识和自我管理。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Sep 1;41(9):655-664. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000998.
3
Assessment of health literacy among migrant populations in Southern Spain: A cross-sectional study.西班牙南部流动人口健康素养评估:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):2600-2610. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1520. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
ICF Linking and Cognitive Interviewing Are Complementary Methods for Optimizing Content Validity of Outcome Measures: An Integrated Methods Review.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》关联与认知访谈是优化结局指标内容效度的互补方法:综合方法综述
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 14;2:702596. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.702596. eCollection 2021.
5
Building health literacy system capacity: a framework for health literate systems.构建健康素养体系能力:健康素养体系框架。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_1):i13-i23. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab153.
6
Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC.基于北美护理诊断协会(NANDA - I)和护理结局分类(NOC)开发并验证用于评估失语症患者沟通能力的CEECCA问卷内容效度。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;9(11):1459. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111459.
7
Content validation of the nursing outcome Knowledge Heart Failure Management: Brazilian nurses' opinions.护理结局“心力衰竭管理知识”的内容效度:巴西护士的观点
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jul;32(3):206-214. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12312. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
[Association between health literacy and adherence to medications among older adults].[老年人健康素养与药物依从性之间的关联]
Rev Med Chil. 2020 May;148(5):653-656. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872020000500653.
9
Understanding and Responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health.理解和应对健康素养作为健康的社会决定因素。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:159-173. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
10
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.

健康素养评估在医疗保健中的作用:“健康素养行为”护理结果的内容效度

Role of the health literacy assessment in healthcare: Content validation of "Health Literacy Behaviour" nursing outcome.

作者信息

Correro-Bermejo Alba, Bas-Sarmiento Pilar, Romero-Sánchez José Manuel, Paloma-Castro Olga, Poza-Méndez Miriam, Fernández-Gutiérrez Martina

机构信息

West Sanitary Management Area, Andalusian Public Health System, Cádiz, Spain.

Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Jul;36(3):264-274. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12482. Epub 2024 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12482
PMID:39004610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12282502/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate the content of the "Health Literacy Behaviour" nursing outcome (NO).

METHODS

A content validation study was conducted during 2022. Each indicator was included in the NO, and its response levels were operationally defined. The initial version of each indicator and its response levels were refined and validated through the Delphi method. A panel of health literacy (HL) and nursing taxonomies experts evaluated the content through two content validity indicators. The content validity of the NO and each index was determined by calculating the content validity index (CVI). A qualitative analysis of the recommendations provided by the experts was carried out to improve the understanding of the indicators and their levels.

FINDINGS

A total of 108 experts participated in this study. Mostly females with more than 10 years of professional experience. The results demonstrated a high CVI of the indicators and the NO "Health Literacy Behaviour." All indicators achieved excellent (CVI ≥ 0.80) relevance and clarity. The CVI universal average method (CVI-p) of the NO achieved an excellent result of 0.90.

CONCLUSIONS

The indicators included in the NO "Health Literacy Behaviour" have content validity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

These findings provide evidence-based indicators to measure the patient's actions to obtain, process, and understand information about health and disease, interact with the health system, and make informed health decisions. The validation of this NO would identify populations with low HL, allowing the health of this community to be promoted. Health literacy should be a priority objective of health management and policies.

摘要

目的

验证“健康素养行为”护理结局(NO)的内容。

方法

于2022年开展了一项内容效度研究。每个指标均纳入该护理结局中,并对其反应水平进行操作性定义。通过德尔菲法对每个指标及其反应水平的初始版本进行完善和验证。由健康素养(HL)和护理分类法专家组成的小组通过两个内容效度指标对内容进行评估。通过计算内容效度指数(CVI)来确定该护理结局及每个指标的内容效度。对专家提出的建议进行定性分析,以增进对指标及其水平的理解。

结果

共有108名专家参与了本研究。大多数为女性,拥有超过10年的专业经验。结果显示各指标及“健康素养行为”护理结局的CVI较高。所有指标在相关性和清晰度方面均达到优秀(CVI≥0.80)。该护理结局的CVI通用平均法(CVI-p)达到了0.90的优异结果。

结论

“健康素养行为”护理结局中包含的指标具有内容效度。

对护理实践的启示

这些研究结果提供了基于证据的指标,用以衡量患者获取、处理和理解有关健康与疾病信息、与卫生系统互动以及做出明智健康决策的行为。该护理结局的验证将识别出健康素养较低的人群,从而促进这一群体的健康。健康素养应成为健康管理和政策的首要目标。