Dubey Mahua Jana, Ghosh Ritwik, Das Gautam, Roy Dipayan, Das Shambaditya, Chakraborty Arka Prava, Chatterjee Subham, Dubey Souvik, Benito-León Julián
Department of Psychiatry, Berhampur Mental Hospital, Berhampur, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India.
Department of General Medicine, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
J Relig Health. 2025 Jun;64(3):1876-1889. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02090-9. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
The relationship between spirituality and religiosity and their impact on mental health is intricate and underexplored. This exploratory review aims to elucidate the distinct effects of these constructs, highlighting their contributions to psychological well-being and clinical practices. By dissecting the impacts of spirituality and religiosity on mental health, the study focuses on their individual and combined roles in shaping therapeutic approaches and theoretical understandings in the field. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, focusing on articles discussing spirituality, religiosity, and their intersection with mental health and psychopathology. Out of 312 identified articles, 69 peer-reviewed articles were included after screening for relevance. The results indicate that spirituality and religiosity significantly influence mental health yet are often conflated, leading to research inconsistencies and clinical challenges. Spirituality, as a broad and individualistic pathway, enhances personal well-being and resilience, often transcending organized religious practices. In contrast, religiosity, with its structured community support, sometimes imposes constraints that exacerbate stress under specific doctrinal pressures. Neurobiological evidence suggests that both constructs interact with cognitive processes and brain function, influencing emotional regulation and stress response. The study concludes that distinguishing between spirituality and religiosity is essential for precise academic discourse and effective clinical practice. This differentiation allows for more personalized therapeutic approaches, accommodating an individual's spiritual and religious contexts. The authors propose a refined framework for future research and therapeutic applications to be sensitive to the nuanced experiences of individuals and to better tailor interventions in clinical settings.
灵性与宗教信仰之间的关系及其对心理健康的影响错综复杂且尚未得到充分探索。本探索性综述旨在阐明这些概念的独特影响,突出它们对心理健康和临床实践的贡献。通过剖析灵性与宗教信仰对心理健康的影响,该研究聚焦于它们在塑造该领域治疗方法和理论理解方面的个体作用及综合作用。利用PubMed进行了文献综述,重点关注讨论灵性、宗教信仰以及它们与心理健康和精神病理学交叉点的文章。在312篇已识别的文章中,经过相关性筛选后纳入了69篇同行评审文章。结果表明,灵性和宗教信仰对心理健康有显著影响,但常常被混淆,导致研究不一致和临床挑战。灵性作为一条广泛且个体化的途径,能提升个人幸福感和恢复力,常常超越有组织的宗教活动。相比之下,宗教信仰凭借其结构化的社区支持,有时会在特定教义压力下施加加剧压力的限制。神经生物学证据表明,这两个概念都与认知过程和大脑功能相互作用,影响情绪调节和应激反应。该研究得出结论,区分灵性和宗教信仰对于精确的学术论述和有效的临床实践至关重要。这种区分有助于采用更个性化的治疗方法,顾及个人的灵性和宗教背景。作者提出了一个完善的框架,供未来研究和治疗应用参考,以便对个体的细微体验保持敏感,并在临床环境中更好地量身定制干预措施。