Suppr超能文献

心理健康研究中宗教信仰与精神性的概念化及测量面临的挑战。

Challenges to the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religiosity and Spirituality in Mental Health Research.

作者信息

Baumsteiger Rachel, Chenneville Tiffany

机构信息

Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th St., Claremont, CA, 91711, USA.

University of South Florida Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2015 Dec;54(6):2344-54. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0008-7.

Abstract

Investigating religiosity and spirituality may help to further elucidate how individuals' worldviews influence their attitudes, behavior, and overall well-being. However, inconsistencies in how these constructs are conceptualized and measured may undercut the potential value of religiosity and spirituality research. Results from a survey of undergraduate students suggest that laypeople define spirituality as independent from social influence and that few people associate religiosity with negative terms. A content analysis of spirituality measures indicates that spirituality measures contain items that do not directly measure the strength of spirituality. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

摘要

研究宗教信仰和精神性可能有助于进一步阐明个人的世界观如何影响他们的态度、行为和整体幸福感。然而,这些概念的概念化和测量方式的不一致可能会削弱宗教信仰和精神性研究的潜在价值。一项对本科生的调查结果表明,外行人将精神性定义为独立于社会影响,而且很少有人将宗教信仰与负面词汇联系起来。对精神性测量的内容分析表明,精神性测量包含的项目并没有直接测量精神性的强度。本文讨论了对未来研究的启示和建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验