Oza Shubhashini, Bell Katherine Y, Xu Zhiliang, Wang Yifei, Wells Martha J M, Norton John W, Winchell Lloyd J, Huang Qingguo, Li Hui
Brown and Caldwell, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Brown and Caldwell, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jan-Feb;54(1):6-19. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20595. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are refractory anthropogenic chemicals and current treatment processes at municipal water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) cannot efficiently degrade them, hence, these chemicals cycle through the environment. Certain PFAS can be concentrated in biosolids from WRRFs and are commonly land applied for beneficial reuse. Given recent advances in measurement of PFAS, documentation of the range of concentrations in pre-stabilized sludge and stabilized biosolids is critical to evaluating treatment best practices and assessing potential human health and ecological risks. In this study, pre-stabilized sludge and post-stabilized biosolids samples were collected from 12 major WRRFs across the United States. PFAS were analyzed using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method SW846-3500C/537.1, and Draft EPA Method 1633, by one commercial laboratory and two university research laboratories, respectively. Results comparison among laboratories demonstrated statistical differences in PFAS concentrations among split samples. For example, 5:3 FTCA (fluorotelomer carboxylic acid) concentrations in post-stabilized sludge at Lab 1 were measured at 21 ng/g (dry), while they were detected at 151 ng/g (dry) in Lab 3. Further, higher PFAS concentrations were observed in post-stabilized biosolids compared to pre-stabilized sludges, regardless of the laboratory or analysis method, even when solids destruction through solids stabilization was considered. Further research is required to refine methods for analyses of PFAS in sludge and biosolids samples from WRRFs prior to being used for development of regulatory actions as well as understanding how various treatment protocols could impact concentrations of PFAS in land-applied biosolids.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是难降解的人为化学品,城市水资源回收设施(WRRFs)目前的处理工艺无法有效降解它们,因此,这些化学品在环境中循环。某些PFAS可以在WRRFs的生物固体中富集,并且通常用于土地有益回用。鉴于PFAS测量方面的最新进展,记录预稳定污泥和稳定生物固体中的浓度范围对于评估处理最佳实践以及评估潜在的人类健康和生态风险至关重要。在本研究中,从美国12个主要的WRRFs收集了预稳定污泥和后稳定生物固体样品。分别由一个商业实验室和两个大学研究实验室使用环境保护局(EPA)方法SW846 - 3500C/537.1和EPA方法草案1633对PFAS进行分析。实验室间的结果比较表明,分割样品中PFAS浓度存在统计学差异。例如,实验室1中后稳定污泥中5:3氟调聚物羧酸(FTCA)的浓度测量值为21 ng/g(干重),而在实验室3中检测到的浓度为151 ng/g(干重)。此外,无论实验室或分析方法如何,即使考虑了通过固体稳定化进行的固体破坏,后稳定生物固体中的PFAS浓度也高于预稳定污泥。在将WRRFs的污泥和生物固体样品用于制定监管行动之前,以及了解各种处理方案如何影响土地施用生物固体中PFAS的浓度之前,需要进一步研究以完善PFAS分析方法。