Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States.
Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2024 Sep 1;327(3):R320-R327. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00114.2024. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Individuals over the age of 65 yr are the most vulnerable population during severe environmental heat events, experiencing worse health outcomes than any other age cohort. The risk is greater in older women than in age-matched men; however, whether that reflects a greater susceptibility to heat in women, or simply population sex proportionality, is unclear. Seventy-two participants (29 M/43 F) aged 40-92 yr were exposed to progressive heat stress at a metabolic rate designed to reflect activities of daily living. Experiments were conducted in both hot-dry (HD; up to 53°C; ≤25% rh) and warm-humid (WH; ∼35°C; ≥50% rh) environments. After critical limits were determined for each condition, forward stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were conducted with net metabolic rate (M) and age entered into the model first, followed by sex, body mass (m), maximal oxygen consumption (V̇o), body surface area, and LDL cholesterol. After accounting for M and age, sex further improved the regression model in the HD environment ([Formula: see text] = 0.34, < 0.001) and the WH environment ([Formula: see text] = 0.36, < 0.005). Sex explained ∼15% of the variance in critical environmental limits in HD conditions and 12% in WH conditions. Heat compensability curves were shifted leftward for older women, indicating age- and sex-dependent heat vulnerability compared with middle-aged women and older men in WH ( = 0.007, = 0.03) and HD ( = 0.001, = 0.01) environments. This reflects the heterogeneity of thermal-balance thresholds associated with aging relative to those seen in young adults and suggests that older females are more vulnerable than their age-matched male counterparts. In contrast to young adults, there are sex differences in critical environmental limits in middle-aged and older adults. Older women exhibit lower critical environmental limits in both humid and dry extreme environments demonstrated by a leftward shift in heat compensability curves. These data confirm a true sex difference in heat vulnerability of older adults and support the epidemiological mortality data from environmental heat waves.
超过 65 岁的个体是严重环境热事件中最脆弱的人群,其健康状况比任何其他年龄组都差。老年女性的风险大于年龄匹配的男性;然而,这是反映女性对热的敏感性更高,还是仅仅反映了人口性别比例,尚不清楚。72 名年龄在 40-92 岁的参与者(29 名男性/43 名女性)以反映日常生活活动的代谢率暴露于逐渐增加的热应激下。实验在干热(HD;高达 53°C;≤25%相对湿度)和湿热(WH;约 35°C;≥50%相对湿度)环境中进行。确定每种条件的临界极限后,首先将净代谢率(M)和年龄输入模型,然后进行逐步多元线性回归分析,随后是性别、体重(m)、最大摄氧量(V̇o)、体表面积和 LDL 胆固醇。在考虑 M 和年龄后,性别在 HD 环境([公式:见文本] = 0.34,<0.001)和 WH 环境([公式:见文本] = 0.36,<0.005)中进一步改进了回归模型。性别解释了 HD 条件下环境极限变化的约 15%,WH 条件下约 12%。与中年女性和老年男性相比,老年女性的热补偿曲线向左移动,表明她们在 WH(=0.007,=0.03)和 HD(=0.001,=0.01)环境中存在年龄和性别相关的热脆弱性。这反映了与年轻人相比,与衰老相关的热平衡阈值的异质性,并表明老年女性比同龄男性更脆弱。与年轻人不同,中年和老年人的环境临界极限存在性别差异。在湿热和干燥极端环境中,老年女性的临界环境极限较低,表现为热补偿曲线向左移动。这些数据证实了老年人热脆弱性的真正性别差异,并支持环境热浪的流行病学死亡率数据。