Begum Ali Jannath, Holman Rebecca, Goodwin Amy L, Heraty Siofra, Jones Emily J H
Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, England, UK.
Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College London, London, England, UK.
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jun 3;3:182. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16516.2. eCollection 2023.
Data sharing in developmental science is increasingly encouraged, supported by funder and publisher mandates for open data access. Data sharing can accelerate discovery, link researchers with high quality analytic expertise to researchers with large datasets and democratise the research landscape to enable researchers with limited funding to access large sample sizes. However, there are also significant privacy and security concerns, in addition to conceptual and ethical considerations. These are particularly acute for developmental science, where child participants cannot consent themselves. As we move forward into a new era of data openness, it is essential that we adequately represent the views of stakeholder communities in designing data sharing efforts.
We conducted a comprehensive survey of the opinions of 195 parents on data sharing in developmental science. Survey themes included how widely parents are willing to share their child's data, which type of organisations they would share the data with and the type of consent they would be comfortable providing.
Results showed that parents were generally supportive of curated, but not open, data sharing. In addition to individual privacy and security concerns, more altruistic considerations around the purpose of research were important. Parents overwhelmingly supported nuanced consenting models in which preferences for particular types of data sharing could be changed over time. This model is different to that implemented in the vast majority of developmental science research and is contrary to many funder or publisher mandates.
The field should look to create shared repositories that implement features such as dynamic consent and mechanisms for curated sharing that allow consideration of the scientific questions addressed. Better communication and outreach are required to build trust in data sharing, and advanced analytic methods will be required to understand the impact of selective sharing on reproducibility and representativeness of research datasets.
在资助者和出版商对开放数据访问的要求的支持下,发育科学中的数据共享越来越受到鼓励。数据共享可以加速发现,将拥有高质量分析专业知识的研究人员与拥有大型数据集的研究人员联系起来,并使研究环境更加民主,使资金有限的研究人员能够获取大样本量的数据。然而,除了概念和伦理方面的考虑外,还存在重大的隐私和安全问题。对于发育科学来说,这些问题尤为严重,因为儿童参与者无法自行表示同意。随着我们迈向数据开放的新时代,在设计数据共享工作时充分体现利益相关者群体的观点至关重要。
我们对195名家长关于发育科学中数据共享的意见进行了全面调查。调查主题包括家长愿意在多大程度上分享孩子的数据、他们愿意与哪种类型的组织共享数据以及他们愿意提供何种类型的同意。
结果表明,家长普遍支持经过策划而非开放的数据共享。除了个人隐私和安全问题外,围绕研究目的的更具利他性的考虑也很重要。家长们绝大多数支持细致入微的同意模式,即对特定类型数据共享的偏好可以随时间变化。这种模式不同于绝大多数发育科学研究中所采用的模式,也与许多资助者或出版商的要求相悖。
该领域应寻求创建共享存储库,实施动态同意等功能以及经过策划的共享机制,以便能够考虑所解决的科学问题。需要更好的沟通和宣传来建立对数据共享的信任,并且需要先进的分析方法来理解选择性共享对研究数据集的可重复性和代表性的影响。