State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining, China.
College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, China.
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 9;12:e17710. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17710. eCollection 2024.
As the most widely distributed scavenger birds on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Himalayan vultures () feed on the carcasses of various wild and domestic animals, facing the dual selection pressure of pathogens and antibiotics and are suitable biological sentinel species for monitoring antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). This study used metagenomic sequencing to comparatively investigate the ARGs and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) of wild and captive Himalayan vultures. Overall, the resistome of Himalayan vultures contained 414 ARG subtypes resistant to 20 ARG types, with abundances ranging from 0.01 to 1,493.60 ppm. The most abundant resistance type was beta-lactam (175 subtypes), followed by multidrug resistance genes with 68 subtypes. Decreases in the abundance of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) resistance genes were observed in the wild group compared with the zoo group. A total of 75 genera (five phyla) of bacteria were predicted to be the hosts of ARGs in Himalayan vultures, and the clinical (102 ARGs) and high-risk ARGs (35 Rank I and 56 Rank II ARGs) were also analyzed. Among these ARGs, twenty-two clinical ARGs, nine Rank I ARG subtypes, sixteen Rank II ARG subtypes were found to differ significantly between the two groups. Five types of MGEs (128 subtypes) were found in Himalayan vultures. Plasmids (62 subtypes) and transposases (44 subtypes) were found to be the main MGE types. Efflux pump and antibiotic deactivation were the main resistance mechanisms of ARGs in Himalayan vultures. Decreases in the abundance of cellular protection were identified in wild Himalayan vultures compared with the captive Himalayan vultures. Procrustes analysis and the co-occurrence networks analysis revealed different patterns of correlations among gut microbes, ARGs, and MGEs in wild and captive Himalayan vultures. This study is the first step in describing the characterization of the ARGs in the gut of Himalayan vultures and highlights the need to pay more attention to scavenging birds.
作为青藏高原分布最广的食腐鸟类,喜马拉雅秃鹫()以各种野生动物和家养动物的尸体为食,同时面临着病原体和抗生素的双重选择压力,是监测抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的合适生物哨兵物种。本研究采用宏基因组测序比较研究了野生和圈养喜马拉雅秃鹫的 ARGs 和可移动遗传元件(MGEs)。总体而言,喜马拉雅秃鹫的抗性组包含 414 种 ARG 亚型,对 20 种 ARG 类型具有抗性,丰度范围为 0.01 至 1,493.60 ppm。最丰富的抗性类型是β-内酰胺(175 种亚型),其次是多药耐药基因,有 68 种亚型。与圈养组相比,野生组中大环内酯-林可酰胺-链阳菌素(MLS)耐药基因的丰度降低。预测在喜马拉雅秃鹫中,共有 75 个属(五个门)的细菌是 ARG 的宿主,还分析了临床(102 个 ARG)和高风险 ARG(35 个一级和 56 个二级 ARG)。在这些 ARG 中,两组之间差异显著的有 22 种临床 ARG、9 种一级 ARG 亚型、16 种二级 ARG 亚型。在喜马拉雅秃鹫中发现了 5 种 MGEs(128 种亚型)。发现质粒(62 种亚型)和转座酶(44 种亚型)是主要的 MGE 类型。外排泵和抗生素失活是喜马拉雅秃鹫中 ARG 的主要耐药机制。与圈养的喜马拉雅秃鹫相比,野生喜马拉雅秃鹫的细胞保护丰度降低。普罗克斯分析和共同发生网络分析显示,野生和圈养喜马拉雅秃鹫的肠道微生物、ARGs 和 MGEs 之间存在不同的关联模式。本研究是描述喜马拉雅秃鹫肠道中 ARGs 特征的第一步,强调需要更多地关注食腐鸟类。