Suppr超能文献

弯曲根管中碎屑挤出的评估:各种单根管牙髓治疗器械系统的体外分析

Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems.

作者信息

Ahmad Muhammad Zubair

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dental Sciences College of Dentistry Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2024 Jul 5;2024:8367693. doi: 10.1155/2024/8367693. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Rotary single-file endodontic systems are commonly used for root canal treatment. However, very few studies have evaluated the apical extrusion of debris generated by these systems during canal preparation at normal body temperature in laboratory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris caused by seven different single-file endodontic instrumentation systems at body temperature in mandibular molar teeth with curved root canals.

METHODS

One hundred forty mandibular first permanent molars were randomly divided into seven groups ( = 20) to be prepared by one of the following systems at 35°C: Reciproc Blue (REC Blue), WaveOne Gold (WOG), One Reci (OR), Neoniti, HyFlex EDM (HEDM), One Curve (OC), or XP Shaper (XPS). Debris was collected into preweighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was recorded by subtracting the weight of the tooth-free apparatus from the post-procedure weight. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (  < 5%).

RESULTS

REC Blue, WOG, and OR groups extruded significantly more debris from the apex than XPS, OC, and Neoniti groups (  < 0.05). No significant difference was observed among the XPS, OC, Neoniti, and HEDM groups (  > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

All the instruments were associated with debris extrusion. However, REC Blue, WOG, and OR extrude significantly more debris than other instruments. The amount of debris with different files was REC Blue > OR > WOG > HEDM > OC > Neoniti > XPS. XPS, Neoniti, and OC caused significantly less extrusion of debris than REC Blue, WOG, and OR.

摘要

目的

旋转单根管牙髓治疗系统常用于根管治疗。然而,在实验室条件下,很少有研究评估这些系统在正常体温下进行根管预备时产生的碎屑向根尖孔外的挤出情况。本研究的目的是评估七种不同的单根管牙髓治疗器械系统在下颌磨牙弯曲根管中,在体温条件下导致的根尖孔外挤出碎屑的量。

方法

140颗下颌第一恒磨牙随机分为七组(每组 = 20颗),在35°C下分别用以下系统之一进行预备:Reciproc Blue(REC Blue)、WaveOne Gold(WOG)、One Reci(OR)、Neoniti、HyFlex EDM(HEDM)、One Curve(OC)或XP Shaper(XPS)。碎屑收集到预先称重的Eppendorf管中。通过从操作后器械的重量中减去无牙器械的重量来记录挤出碎屑的重量。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(P < 0.05)。

结果

REC Blue、WOG和OR组从根尖孔挤出的碎屑明显多于XPS、OC和Neoniti组(P < 0.05)。XPS、OC、Neoniti和HEDM组之间未观察到显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

所有器械均与碎屑挤出有关。然而,REC Blue、WOG和OR挤出的碎屑明显多于其他器械。不同锉产生的碎屑量为REC Blue>OR>WOG>HEDM>OC>Neoniti>XPS。XPS、Neoniti和OC导致的碎屑挤出明显少于REC Blue、WOG和OR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e095/11245337/3633d732fd52/IJD2024-8367693.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验