• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赞烹饪燃气补贴:推动健康与公平的过渡性燃料。

In praise of cooking gas subsidies: transitional fuels to advance health and equity.

作者信息

Gould Carlos F, Bailis Rob, Balakrishnan Kalpana, Burke Marshall, Espinoza Sebastián, Mehta Sumi, Schlesinger Samuel B, Suarez-Lopez José R, Pillarisetti Ajay

机构信息

Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.

Stockholm Environment Institute, Somerville, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

Environ Res Lett. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):081002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad5d06. Epub 2024 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ad5d06
PMID:39007070
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11240120/
Abstract

Households that burn biomass in inefficient open fires-a practice that results in $1.6 trillion in global damages from health impacts and climate-altering emissions yearly-are often unable to access cleaner alternatives, like gas, which is widely available but unaffordable, or electricity, which is unattainable for many due to insufficient supply and reliability of electricity services. Governments are often reluctant to make gas affordable. We argue that condemnation of all fossil fuel subsidies is short-sighted and does not adequately consider subsidizing gas for cooking as a potential strategy to improve public health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

摘要

那些以低效明火方式燃烧生物质燃料的家庭——这种做法每年因健康影响和改变气候的排放造成全球1.6万亿美元的损失——往往无法获得更清洁的替代能源,比如天然气,它虽广泛可得但价格昂贵,或者电力,由于电力供应不足和可靠性差,许多人无法获得电力。政府往往不愿让天然气价格变得可承受。我们认为,谴责所有化石燃料补贴是目光短浅的,没有充分考虑将烹饪用天然气补贴作为改善公众健康和减少温室气体排放的潜在策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/11240120/bb1a10fa7ef7/erlad5d06f1_lr.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/11240120/bb1a10fa7ef7/erlad5d06f1_lr.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/11240120/bb1a10fa7ef7/erlad5d06f1_lr.jpg

相似文献

1
In praise of cooking gas subsidies: transitional fuels to advance health and equity.赞烹饪燃气补贴:推动健康与公平的过渡性燃料。
Environ Res Lett. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):081002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad5d06. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
2
In praise of fossil fuel subsidies (for cooking).赞(用于烹饪的)化石燃料补贴。
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 13:2023.10.26.23297550. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.26.23297550.
3
Household Energy Interventions and Health and Finances in Haryana, India: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis印度哈里亚纳邦的家庭能源干预措施与健康和财务状况:一项扩展的成本效益分析
4
Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions.除非在能源出口地区,否则减少燃料补贴的排放有限。
Nature. 2018 Feb 7;554(7691):229-233. doi: 10.1038/nature25467.
5
Why energy access is not enough for choosing clean cooking fuels? Evidence from the multinomial logit model.为什么能源获取不足以选择清洁烹饪燃料?来自多项逻辑回归模型的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112539. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112539. Epub 2021 May 11.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Environmental sustainability of cooking fuels in remote communities: Life cycle and local impacts.偏远社区烹饪燃料的环境可持续性:生命周期和当地影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 15;713:136445. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136445. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Does access to clean cooking fuels reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from BRICS nations.使用清洁烹饪燃料是否能减少环境恶化?金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(32):78948-78958. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27619-5. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
9
Government Policy, Clean Fuel Access, and Persistent Fuel Stacking in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔的政府政策、清洁燃料获取与持续的燃料堆积
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Outlook for modern cooking energy access in Central America.中美洲现代烹饪能源获取展望。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 8;13(6):e0197974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197974. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Climate and health benefits of a transition from gas to electric cooking.从燃气烹饪向电力烹饪转变对气候和健康的好处。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 22;120(34):e2301061120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301061120. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
2
Exposure Contrasts of Pregnant Women during the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Randomized Controlled Trial.孕妇在家庭空气污染干预网络随机对照试验中的暴露对比。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Sep;130(9):97005. doi: 10.1289/EHP10295. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
The effect of clean cooking interventions on mother and child personal exposure to air pollution: results from the Ghana Randomized Air Pollution and Health Study (GRAPHS).
清洁烹饪干预措施对母婴个人空气污染暴露的影响:来自加纳随机空气污染与健康研究(GRAPHS)的结果。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;31(4):683-698. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00309-5. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
4
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 87 种风险因素的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
5
Supply Considerations for Scaling Up Clean Cooking Fuels for Household Energy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家扩大用于家庭能源的清洁烹饪燃料供应的考量因素
Geohealth. 2019 Dec 3;3(12):370-390. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000208. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Power quality and modern energy for all.电能质量与人人享有现代能源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 13;116(33):16308-16313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903610116. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Estimating pollution-attributable mortality at the regional and global scales: challenges in uncertainty estimation and causal inference.估算区域和全球尺度上污染所致死亡率:不确定性估算与因果推断中的挑战。
Eur Heart J. 2019 May 21;40(20):1597-1599. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz200.
8
Government Policy, Clean Fuel Access, and Persistent Fuel Stacking in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔的政府政策、清洁燃料获取与持续的燃料堆积
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter.全球因长期暴露于室外细颗粒物而导致的死亡率估计。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 18;115(38):9592-9597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803222115. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
Clean cooking and the SDGs: Integrated analytical approaches to guide energy interventions for health and environment goals.清洁烹饪与可持续发展目标:指导实现健康与环境目标的能源干预措施的综合分析方法。
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Feb;42:152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.