• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喂养辅助技能评分:可靠性和有效性的开发与验证

Feeding Assistance Skill Score: development and verification of reliability and validity.

作者信息

Nagano Ayano, Maeda Keisuke, Matsumoto Tomohiro, Murotani Kenta, Wakabayashi Hidetaka, Koyama Tamami, Nagai Takako, Mori Naoharu

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Nishinomiya Kyoritsu Neurosurgical Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.

Palliative and Supportive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Oct;15(5):1437-1445. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01016-8. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s41999-024-01016-8
PMID:39008198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11614930/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Feeding assistance should be safe and improve the assisted individual's ability to feed, yet objective tools for evaluating these skills are lacking. This study focuses on developing a tool for assessing feeding assistance skills.

METHODS

A group consisting of 25 experts employed the Delphi method to achieve a consensus on the essential items necessary for assessing feeding assistance skills. Subsequently, a draft score using a three-point scale was developed. To test the reliability of the draft scores, a group of 20 patients and 20 nurses was matched to record a meal assistance scene, which were independently evaluated by three raters. We computed the AC statistic to assess both intra- and inter-rater reliability, and further examined correlations between the Feeding Assistance Skill Score (FASS) scores and outcome items to verify validity.

RESULTS

Initially, an 18-item draft score was generated using the Delphi method. Subsequently, seven items were omitted from the intra- or inter-rater reliability analysis. Furthermore, after discussion, researchers removed one item that assessed food cognition, because the agreement score between the two items was 91%. Finally, the 10-item FASS was developed, showing a correlation with dietary intake upon validation.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a scoring system for peer evaluation of feeding assistance skills. Future studies should aim to validate the FASS. The implementation of the FASS aims to assess the effectiveness of feeding assistance training and care quality, potentially improving safety and satisfaction for those receiving feeding assistance.

摘要

目的

喂食辅助应安全且能提高被辅助者的进食能力,但缺乏评估这些技能的客观工具。本研究着重于开发一种评估喂食辅助技能的工具。

方法

由25名专家组成的小组采用德尔菲法就评估喂食辅助技能所需的基本项目达成共识。随后,制定了一个采用三点量表的初步评分。为测试初步评分的可靠性,选取20名患者和20名护士组成一组记录一次进餐辅助场景,由三名评估者独立进行评估。我们计算了AC统计量以评估评估者内部和评估者之间的可靠性,并进一步检查喂食辅助技能评分(FASS)分数与结果项目之间的相关性以验证有效性。

结果

最初,采用德尔菲法生成了一个包含18个项目的初步评分。随后,在评估者内部或评估者之间的可靠性分析中剔除了7个项目。此外,经过讨论,研究人员删除了一个评估食物认知的项目,因为这两个项目之间的一致率为91%。最终,开发出了包含10个项目的FASS,验证时显示其与饮食摄入量相关。

结论

我们成功开发了一种用于同行评估喂食辅助技能的评分系统。未来的研究应致力于验证FASS。FASS的实施旨在评估喂食辅助培训的有效性和护理质量,有可能提高接受喂食辅助者的安全性和满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6325/11614930/2a895e2a9c98/41999_2024_1016_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6325/11614930/2a895e2a9c98/41999_2024_1016_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6325/11614930/2a895e2a9c98/41999_2024_1016_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Feeding Assistance Skill Score: development and verification of reliability and validity.喂养辅助技能评分:可靠性和有效性的开发与验证
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Oct;15(5):1437-1445. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01016-8. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Development of a tool to assess core cardiorespiratory physiotherapy skills: a Delphi study.开发一种评估核心心肺物理治疗技能的工具:德尔菲研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Sep;38(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1827467. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
4
Assessing physiotherapists' communication skills for promoting patient autonomy for self-management: reliability and validity of the communication evaluation in rehabilitation tool.评估物理治疗师促进患者自主进行自我管理的沟通技巧:康复工具中的沟通评估的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul;41(14):1699-1705. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1443159. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
A scale for measuring evidence-searching capability: A development and validation study.衡量证据检索能力的量表:开发与验证研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;25(4):676-681. doi: 10.1111/jep.13153. Epub 2019 May 10.
6
The effect of rater training on scoring performance and scale-specific expertise amongst occupational therapists participating in a multicentre study: a single-group pre-post-test study.评分者培训对参与多中心研究的职业治疗师评分表现及特定量表专业知识的影响:单组前后测研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(12):1216-26. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1076069. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
7
Reproducibility of radiomics quality score: an intra- and inter-rater reliability study.影像组学质量评分的可重复性:一项内部和外部评分者可靠性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2791-2804. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10217-x. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
8
Relative Validity and Reliability of a 1-Week, Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire for Women Participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.参加补充营养援助计划的女性使用一周半定量食物频率问卷的相对有效性和可靠性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):1972-1982.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
9
"Track style" children's fundamental movement skills test: construction and verification of an efficient evaluation system.“轨迹风格”儿童基本运动技能测试:高效评价系统的构建与验证。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 19;12:1437473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437473. eCollection 2024.
10
Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.《切尔西身体评估工具评估 COVID-19 后康复期患者身体功能的有效性、评分者间信度和可行性:一项横断面研究》。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(3):527-539. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220191.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting safe swallowing of care home residents with dysphagia: How does the care delivered compare with guidance from speech and language therapists?支持吞咽困难的养老院居民安全吞咽:提供的护理与言语治疗师的指导相比如何?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1478-1488. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13015. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
Poor Nutritional Status during Recovery from Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients without an Early Nutritional Intervention Predicts a Poor Prognosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.急性心肌梗死后恢复期未进行早期营养干预的患者营养状况较差预示预后不良:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 10;15(22):4748. doi: 10.3390/nu15224748.
3
Effects of Undernutrition on Swallowing Function and Activities of Daily Living in Hospitalized Patients: Data from the Japanese Sarcopenic Dysphagia Database.
营养不良对住院患者吞咽功能和日常生活活动的影响:来自日本肌少性吞咽困难数据库的数据。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 6;15(5):1291. doi: 10.3390/nu15051291.
4
The effect of care receivers' dysphagia severity on caregiver burden among family caregivers.照料者吞咽困难严重程度对家庭照料者负担的影响。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2022 Oct;22(10):870-875. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14468. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
5
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics.ESPEN 实践指南:老年病临床营养与水合。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Apr;41(4):958-989. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.024. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
6
The Inpatient Experience with Nursing Care Scale (IPENCS): Development, validation and psychometric properties.住院患者护理体验量表(IPENCS):编制、验证及心理测量学特性。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Mar;30(2):570-581. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13509. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
7
Interventions to prevent aspiration in older adults with dysphagia living in nursing homes: a scoping review.养老院中吞咽困难的老年人预防吸入的干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jul 17;21(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02366-9.
8
Improper sitting posture while eating adversely affects maximum tongue pressure.进食时坐姿不当会对最大舌压产生不利影响。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
Potential of an Interorgan Network Mediated by Toxic Advanced Glycation End-Products in a Rat Model.毒性晚期糖基化终产物介导的器官间网络的潜力:在大鼠模型中的研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 29;13(1):80. doi: 10.3390/nu13010080.
10
Mealtime caregiving knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors for persons living with dementia: A systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments.进食时照顾痴呆症患者的知识、态度和行为:工具的心理测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Feb;114:103824. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103824. Epub 2020 Nov 12.