Groves Patricia S, Farag Amany, Perkhounkova Yelena, Sabin Janice A, Witry Matthew J, Wright Brad
College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
School of Medicine, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(2):493-506. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17372. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
To test the influences of patient, safety event and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements of credibility, importance and intent to report patients' safety concerns.
Factorial survey experiment.
A total of 240 nurses were recruited and completed an online survey including demographic information and responses to eight factorial vignettes consisting of unique combinations of eight patient and event factors. Hierarchical multivariate analysis was used to test influences of vignette factors and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements.
The intraclass coefficients for nurse judgements suggest that the variation among nurses exceeded the influence of contextual vignette factors. Several significant sources of nurse variation were identified, including race/ethnicity, suggesting a complex relationship between nurses' characteristics and their potential biases, and the influence of personal and patient factors on nurses' judgements, including the decision to report safety concerns.
Nurses are key players in the system to manage patient safety concerns. Variation among nurses and how they respond to scenarios of patient safety concerns highlight the need for nurse-level intervention.
Complex factors influence nurses' judgement, interpretation and reporting of patients' safety concerns.
Understanding nurse judgement regarding patient-expressed safety concerns is critical for designing processes and systems that promote reporting. Multiple event and patient characteristics (type of event and apparent harm, and patient gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and communication approach) as well as participant characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, years of experience and primary hospital area) impacted participants' judgements of credibility, degree of concern and intent to report. These findings will help guide patient safety nurse education and training.
STROBE guidelines.
Members of the public, including patient advocates, were involved in content validation of the vignette scenarios, norming photographs used in the factorial survey and testing the survey functionality.
检验患者、安全事件及护士特征对护士判断患者安全问题可信度、重要性及上报意愿的影响。
析因调查实验。
共招募240名护士,她们完成了一项在线调查,内容包括人口统计学信息以及对由八个患者和事件因素的独特组合构成的八个析因 vignette 的回答。采用分层多变量分析来检验 vignette 因素和护士特征对护士判断的影响。
护士判断的组内系数表明,护士之间的差异超过了情境 vignette 因素的影响。确定了护士差异的几个重要来源,包括种族/民族,这表明护士特征与其潜在偏见之间存在复杂关系,以及个人和患者因素对护士判断的影响,包括上报安全问题的决定。
护士是管理患者安全问题系统中的关键角色。护士之间的差异以及他们对患者安全问题情景的反应凸显了进行护士层面干预的必要性。
复杂因素影响护士对患者安全问题的判断、解读和上报。
了解护士对患者表达的安全问题的判断对于设计促进上报的流程和系统至关重要。多个事件和患者特征(事件类型和明显伤害,以及患者性别、种族/民族、社会经济地位和沟通方式)以及参与者特征(种族/民族、性别、工作年限和主要医院科室)影响了参与者对可信度、关注程度和上报意愿的判断。这些发现将有助于指导患者安全护士教育和培训。
STROBE 指南。
公众成员,包括患者权益倡导者,参与了 vignette 情景的内容验证、析因调查中使用的标准化照片以及调查功能测试。