Helen and Arthur E. Johnson Beth-El College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Colorado at Colorado Spring, 1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Centre for Cardiovascular Health, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh, EH11 4DN, UK.
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Dec;31(6):987-1017. doi: 10.1007/s12529-024-10305-2. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Interventions that use the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model show promise for increasing PA frequency, duration, and intensity. However, there is limited understanding of how HAPA model variables have been operationalized for PA interventions in chronic disease to promote behavior change and sustained PA or whether the phase or continuous form of the HAPA model was used. The aim of this scoping review is to describe how the HAPA model variables for PA interventions were operationalized and provide details of implementation.
We searched five databases to identify studies published between January 1992 and March 2024. We aimed to describe (1) the characteristics of interventions including setting, delivery mode, duration, and content; (2) which HAPA variables were operationalized and the strategies used; and (3) the physical activity measures and outcome effects.
The search identified 23 interventions in 30 papers (12 protocols, 3 quasi-experimental studies, and 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)). Seven of the 15 RCTs reported significant positive effects of the HAPA model on PA behavior outcomes. Interventions operationalized between three and nine HAPA constructs showed significant variability in how the HAPA model is used in intervention research. PA measures varied from self-report to validated objective instruments.
We found a lack of clarity in decisions about which HAPA constructs were included in interventions. The wide variability in operationalized HAPA constructs made it challenging to compare interventions. Researchers should provide more detail about intervention design and implementation procedures to enhance transparency.
使用健康行动过程方法(HAPA)模型的干预措施显示出增加 PA 频率、持续时间和强度的潜力。然而,对于 HAPA 模型变量如何在慢性病中的 PA 干预中被操作化以促进行为改变和持续的 PA ,或者 HAPA 模型的阶段或连续形式是否被使用,人们的理解有限。本范围综述的目的是描述 PA 干预中 HAPA 模型变量的操作化方式,并提供实施细节。
我们在五个数据库中搜索了 1992 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月期间发表的研究。我们旨在描述:(1)干预措施的特征,包括设置、交付模式、持续时间和内容;(2)操作化的 HAPA 变量和使用的策略;以及(3)体育活动措施和结果效果。
搜索共确定了 30 篇论文中的 23 项干预措施(12 项方案、3 项准实验研究和 15 项随机对照试验(RCT))。15 项 RCT 中有 7 项报告了 HAPA 模型对 PA 行为结果的显著积极影响。操作化了三到九个 HAPA 结构的干预措施在干预研究中使用 HAPA 模型的方式上表现出显著的可变性。PA 测量方法从自我报告到经过验证的客观仪器不等。
我们发现,在决定纳入干预措施的 HAPA 结构方面缺乏明确性。操作化的 HAPA 结构的广泛可变性使得比较干预措施变得具有挑战性。研究人员应提供更多关于干预设计和实施程序的详细信息,以提高透明度。