Department of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK.
Department of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Valdeolmos, Madrid, Spain.
Vet Res. 2024 Jul 15;55(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13567-024-01343-5.
Since the reintroduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) in Europe in 2007 and its subsequent spread to Asia, wild boar has played a crucial role in maintaining and disseminating the virus. There are significant gaps in the knowledge regarding infection dynamics and disease pathogenesis in domestic pigs and wild boar, particularly at the early infection stage. We aimed to compare domestic pigs and wild boar infected intranasally to mimic natural infection with one of the original highly virulent genotype II ASFV isolates (Armenia 2007). The study involved euthanising three domestic pigs and three wild boar on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 post-infection, while four domestic pigs and four wild boar were monitored until they reached a humane endpoint. The parameters assessed included clinical signs, macroscopic lesions, viremia levels, tissue viral load, and virus shedding in nasal and rectal swabs from day 1 post-infection. Compared with domestic pigs, wild boar were more susceptible to ASFV, with a shorter incubation period and earlier onset of clinical signs. While wild boar reached a humane endpoint earlier than domestic pigs did, the macroscopic lesions were comparatively less severe. In addition, wild boar had earlier viremia, and the virus was also detected earlier in tissues. The medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes were identified as key portals for ASFV infection in both subspecies. No viral genome was detected in nasal or rectal swabs until shortly before reaching the humane endpoint in both domestic pigs and wild boar, suggesting limited virus shedding in acute infections.
自 2007 年非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)在欧洲重新出现及其随后传播到亚洲以来,野猪在维持和传播该病毒方面发挥了关键作用。关于家猪和野猪的感染动力学和疾病发病机制,尤其是在早期感染阶段,人们的了解存在很大差距。我们旨在比较经鼻腔感染模拟自然感染的家猪和野猪,使用的是最初高致病性基因型 II ASFV 分离株(亚美尼亚 2007 年)之一。该研究涉及在感染后第 1、2、3 和 5 天安乐死 3 头家猪和 3 头野猪,而 4 头家猪和 4 头野猪则被监测到达到人道终点。评估的参数包括临床症状、宏观病变、病毒血症水平、组织病毒载量以及从感染后第 1 天起在鼻拭子和直肠拭子中的病毒脱落。与家猪相比,野猪对 ASFV 更易感,潜伏期更短,临床症状出现更早。虽然野猪比家猪更早达到人道终点,但宏观病变相对较轻。此外,野猪的病毒血症更早出现,组织中也更早检测到病毒。在这两个亚种中,咽后正中淋巴结被确定为 ASFV 感染的关键门户。在家猪和野猪中,直到接近人道终点前不久,鼻拭子或直肠拭子中均未检测到病毒基因组,表明急性感染时病毒脱落有限。