• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国女性双侧卵巢切除术的流行率。

Bilateral Oophorectomy Prevalence Among U.S. Women.

机构信息

Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Nov;33(11):1457-1463. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1134. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2023.1134
PMID:39011627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11980043/
Abstract

Bilateral oophorectomy has been linked to numerous health outcomes, some of which can have a long latency period. Limited data are available on bilateral oophorectomy prevalence among U.S. women. The National Health Interview Survey fielded measures of bilateral oophorectomy most recently in 2010 and 2015. We pooled these 2 data years to present bilateral oophorectomy prevalence estimates by age-group, race, ethnicity, geographic region, and hysterectomy status. Our study found bilateral oophorectomy was common among older women. Among women aged 70-79 years, 29% reported a bilateral oophorectomy, compared with <1% for women aged 20-29 years. By geographic region, bilateral oophorectomy prevalence among women 20-84 years was 12.3% in the South, 10.8% in the Midwest, 9.4% in the West, and 8.0% in the Northeast. Small numbers limited our ability to generate age-specific estimates for American Indian and Alaska Native women and subgroups of Asian and Hispanic women. Nearly half of women who had a bilateral oophorectomy reported their procedure occurred more than 20 years ago. Among women aged 20-84 years who reported a hysterectomy, 57% reported they also had both of their ovaries removed. Standard measures of incidence rates for ovarian cancer are not adjusted for oophorectomy status. These findings suggest that ovarian cancer incidence rates may be underestimated among older women. Continued monitoring of bilateral oophorectomy prevalence will be needed to track its potential impact on ovarian cancer incidence and numerous other chronic health outcomes.

摘要

双侧卵巢切除术与许多健康结果有关,其中一些结果可能潜伏期很长。美国女性双侧卵巢切除术的流行率数据有限。国家健康访谈调查最近在 2010 年和 2015 年对双侧卵巢切除术进行了测量。我们将这 2 个数据年合并,按年龄组、种族、族裔、地理区域和子宫切除术状况呈现双侧卵巢切除术的流行率估计值。我们的研究发现,双侧卵巢切除术在老年女性中很常见。在 70-79 岁的女性中,有 29%报告进行了双侧卵巢切除术,而 20-29 岁的女性中不到 1%。按地理区域,20-84 岁女性的双侧卵巢切除术流行率在南部为 12.3%,中西部为 10.8%,西部为 9.4%,东北部为 8.0%。由于人数较少,我们无法为美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民女性以及亚裔和西班牙裔女性的亚组生成特定年龄的估计值。将近一半进行了双侧卵巢切除术的女性报告其手术发生在 20 多年前。在报告子宫切除术的 20-84 岁女性中,有 57%报告她们还切除了两个卵巢。卵巢癌的发病率标准衡量标准未调整卵巢切除术的情况。这些发现表明,老年女性的卵巢癌发病率可能被低估了。需要继续监测双侧卵巢切除术的流行率,以跟踪其对卵巢癌发病率和许多其他慢性健康结果的潜在影响。

相似文献

1
Bilateral Oophorectomy Prevalence Among U.S. Women.美国女性双侧卵巢切除术的流行率。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Nov;33(11):1457-1463. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1134. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Association between endometriosis and type and age of menopause: a pooled analysis of 279 948 women from five cohort studies.子宫内膜异位症与绝经类型及年龄之间的关联:来自五项队列研究的279948名女性的汇总分析
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jun 1;40(6):1210-1219. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf068.
4
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
5
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
7
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2020.暴力死亡监测 - 全国暴力死亡报告系统,2020 年,48 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 May 26;72(5):1-38. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7205a1.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.

引用本文的文献

1
Early menopause, hysterectomy, and biological aging: Health and Retirement Study.早期绝经、子宫切除术与生物衰老:健康与退休研究
Menopause. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002555.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term effects of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy on physical aging and chronic medical conditions.绝经前双侧卵巢切除术加或不加子宫切除术对身体衰老和慢性疾病的长期影响。
Menopause. 2023 Nov 1;30(11):1090-1097. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002254. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Salpingectomy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario.输卵管切除术与安大略省卵巢癌风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327198. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27198.
3
Long-term outcomes of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫切除术联合双侧输卵管卵巢切除术的长期结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;230(1):44-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.043. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
4
Hysterectomy With and Without Oophorectomy, Tubal Ligation, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in the Nurses' Health Study II.子宫切除术伴或不伴卵巢切除术、输卵管结扎术与护士健康研究 II 中心血管疾病风险。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Jul;32(7):747-756. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0207. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
Hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and breast cancer risk in a racially diverse prospective cohort study.子宫切除术、双侧卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险:一项种族多样化的前瞻性队列研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Jun 8;115(6):662-670. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad038.
6
Frequency and type of premature or early menopause in a geographically defined American population.一个地理定义的美国人群中,过早或早期绝经的频率和类型。
Maturitas. 2023 Apr;170:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Time Trends in Unilateral and Bilateral Oophorectomy in a Geographically Defined American Population.在一个地理位置明确的美国人群中,单侧和双侧卵巢切除术的时间趋势。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May 1;139(5):724-734. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004728. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Racial and ethnic differences in the adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国在采用预防性输卵管切除术降低卵巢癌发病风险方面的种族和民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):257.e1-257.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
9
Outcomes From Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention.机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47343.
10
US hysterectomy prevalence by age, race and ethnicity from BRFSS and NHIS: implications for analyses of cervical and uterine cancer rates.美国 BRFSS 和 NHIS 按年龄、种族和民族划分的子宫切除术流行率:对宫颈癌和子宫癌发病率分析的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Jan;33(1):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01496-0. Epub 2021 Sep 21.