• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and breast cancer risk in a racially diverse prospective cohort study.子宫切除术、双侧卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险:一项种族多样化的前瞻性队列研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Jun 8;115(6):662-670. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad038.
2
Hormone therapy use and young-onset breast cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts included in the Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.激素疗法的使用与青年期乳腺癌:绝经前乳腺癌协作组纳入的前瞻性队列的汇总分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Jul;26(7):911-923. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00211-6.
3
Reproductive factors, menopausal hormone therapies and primary liver cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.生殖因素、绝经激素治疗与原发性肝癌风险:观察性研究的系统评价和剂量-反应荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Dec;23(1):126-138. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw037. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
4
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
5
Associations of Hysterectomy, Oophorectomy, and Hormone Replacement Therapy With the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Postmenopausal Women.子宫切除术、卵巢切除术及激素替代疗法与绝经后女性2型糖尿病风险的关联。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2025 Aug;103(2):167-176. doi: 10.1111/cen.15253. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
6
Cardiovascular Disease After Hysterectomy in the Nurses' Health Study and Nurses' Health Study II.护士健康研究及护士健康研究II中子宫切除术后的心血管疾病
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 8;146(1):85-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005902.
7
Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.围绝经期和绝经后女性的长期激素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 17;1(1):CD004143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004143.pub5.
8
Association between endometriosis and type and age of menopause: a pooled analysis of 279 948 women from five cohort studies.子宫内膜异位症与绝经类型及年龄之间的关联:来自五项队列研究的279948名女性的汇总分析
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jun 1;40(6):1210-1219. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf068.
9
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.对局部晚期宫颈癌女性患者进行子宫切除术并辅以放疗或化疗或两者联合治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 7(4):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub2.
10
Bilateral Oophorectomy and All-Cause Mortality in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Sequence Variations.双侧卵巢切除术与携带 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 序列变异女性的全因死亡率。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Apr 1;10(4):484-492. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6937.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Risk After Hysterectomy: A Health Insurance Database-Based Analysis.子宫切除术后的乳腺癌风险:基于健康保险数据库的分析
J Breast Cancer. 2025 Aug;28(4):215-227. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2025.0031. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Hormone therapy use and young-onset breast cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts included in the Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.激素疗法的使用与青年期乳腺癌:绝经前乳腺癌协作组纳入的前瞻性队列的汇总分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Jul;26(7):911-923. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00211-6.
3
Bilateral Oophorectomy Prevalence Among U.S. Women.美国女性双侧卵巢切除术的流行率。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Nov;33(11):1457-1463. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1134. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
Association of Fibroids, Endometriosis, and Gynecologic Surgeries with Breast Cancer Incidence and Hormone Receptor Subtypes.子宫肌瘤、子宫内膜异位症和妇科手术与乳腺癌发病和激素受体亚型的相关性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Apr 3;33(4):576-585. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1014.
5
Factors Associated with Longitudinal Changes in Mammographic Density in a Multiethnic Breast Screening Cohort of Postmenopausal Women.与绝经后妇女多民族乳腺筛查队列中乳腺密度纵向变化相关的因素。
Breast J. 2023 Oct 17;2023:2794603. doi: 10.1155/2023/2794603. eCollection 2023.
6
Nomograms constructed for predicting diagnosis and prognosis in cervical cancer patients with second primary malignancies: a SEER database analysis.用于预测伴有第二原发性恶性肿瘤的宫颈癌患者诊断和预后的列线图:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(14):13201-13210. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05192-1. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.美国剖宫产术中从输卵管结扎到偶然输卵管切除术的范式转变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):399.e1-399.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.074. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
2
Changing trends in Black-White racial differences in surgical menopause: a population-based study.手术绝经黑人-白人种族差异的变化趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):502.e1-502.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.045. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
3
Association of Menopausal Hormone Therapy With Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality During Long-term Follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials.绝经激素治疗与妇女健康倡议随机临床试验长期随访中乳腺癌发病率和死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 28;324(4):369-380. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9482.
4
Breast cancer risk after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign indications.良性指征下子宫切除术伴或不伴输卵管卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):900.e1-900.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
The rapid adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease in the United States.美国在因良性妇科疾病行子宫切除术时快速采用机会性输卵管切除术。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):721.e1-721.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.028. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Uterine fibroid incidence and growth in an ultrasound-based, prospective study of young African Americans.基于超声的年轻非裔美国人前瞻性研究中子宫肌瘤的发病和生长情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):402.e1-402.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, natural menopause, and breast cancer risk: an international prospective cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术、自然绝经与乳腺癌风险:BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变携带者的国际前瞻性队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 16;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-1247-4.
8
Progesterone and Breast Cancer.孕激素与乳腺癌。
Endocr Rev. 2020 Apr 1;41(2):320-44. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnz001.
9
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.774:机会性输卵管切除术作为上皮性卵巢癌预防策略。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):e279-e284. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003164.
10
Risk-Reducing Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk Across the Spectrum of Familial Risk.降低风险的卵巢切除术与家族风险谱中乳腺癌风险的关系。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Mar 1;111(3):331-334. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy182.

子宫切除术、双侧卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险:一项种族多样化的前瞻性队列研究。

Hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and breast cancer risk in a racially diverse prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Jun 8;115(6):662-670. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad038.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djad038
PMID:36806439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10248837/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gynecologic surgery is hypothesized to reduce risk of breast cancer; however, associations may be modified by subsequent hormone use. Our objective was to examine the association between gynecologic surgery and breast cancer incidence considering the use of hormone therapy.

METHODS

The Sister Study is a prospective cohort of initially breast cancer-free women aged 35-74 years with a sister who had breast cancer. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between gynecologic surgery (no surgery, hysterectomy only, bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy) and incident breast cancer among 50 701 women.

RESULTS

History of gynecologic surgery was common, with 13.8% reporting hysterectomy only and 18.1% reporting bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy. During follow-up (median = 11.4 years), 3948 cases were diagnosed. Compared with no surgery, bilateral oophorectomy was inversely associated with breast cancer (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.00), and hysterectomy alone was positively associated (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.23). Compared with no surgery and no hormone therapy, bilateral oophorectomy combined with estrogen only therapy (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.94) was inversely associated with breast cancer, while hysterectomy combined with estrogen plus progestin therapy was positively associated with breast cancer (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.55).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed an inverse association between bilateral oophorectomy and breast cancer risk. The positive association between hysterectomy and breast cancer may be due to concomitant estrogen plus progestin therapy.

摘要

背景

妇科手术被认为可降低乳腺癌风险;然而,这种关联可能会因后续激素使用而改变。我们的目的是在考虑激素治疗的情况下,研究妇科手术与乳腺癌发病之间的关联。

方法

姐妹研究是一项针对最初无乳腺癌的 35-74 岁女性的前瞻性队列研究,她们有一位患有乳腺癌的姐妹。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型来估计 50701 名女性中妇科手术(无手术、单纯子宫切除术、双侧卵巢切除术伴或不伴子宫切除术)与乳腺癌发病之间的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

妇科手术史常见,13.8%的女性报告单纯子宫切除术,18.1%的女性报告双侧卵巢切除术伴或不伴子宫切除术。在随访期间(中位=11.4 年),诊断出 3948 例病例。与无手术相比,双侧卵巢切除术与乳腺癌呈负相关(HR=0.91,95%CI=0.83 至 1.00),而单纯子宫切除术呈正相关(HR=1.12,95%CI=1.02 至 1.23)。与无手术和无激素治疗相比,双侧卵巢切除术联合雌激素治疗(HR=0.83,95%CI=0.74 至 0.94)与乳腺癌呈负相关,而子宫切除术联合雌激素加孕激素治疗与乳腺癌呈正相关(HR=1.25,95%CI=1.01 至 1.55)。

结论

我们观察到双侧卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险呈负相关。子宫切除术与乳腺癌的正相关可能是由于同时使用雌激素加孕激素治疗。