• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别差异、学术专利和中国的终身教职改革:来自顶尖大学生命科学的证据。

Gender differences, academic patenting, and tenure-track reform in China: Evidence from life sciences at elite universities.

机构信息

College of Law, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Carsgen Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307165. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0307165
PMID:39012865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11251593/
Abstract

This study is the first to examine the gender gap in academic patenting among faculty members in Chinese universities, a critical issue for the sustainable development of scientific research and innovation. Using a unique dataset that includes the patenting activities and professional status of 1,836 faculty members in life science-related departments at 36 top Chinese universities, this research reveals an evolving landscape of patenting dynamics. The trend of male faculty members leading in the annual number of patent applications and patents granted has shifted among newly graduated faculty members. Female faculty submit and receive their first patent applications significantly earlier than male faculty. However, male faculty are more likely to be lead inventors, and this gender gap remains difficult to close, with female faculty more likely to be supporting inventors. This research is contextualized within the broader framework of China's university tenure reform and the growing presence of women in the life sciences. While progress is evident, the study uncovers persistent systemic barriers that prevent women from fully translating their research into patentable innovations. By identifying these social and institutional barriers, our study not only sheds light on the gender gap, but also suggests policy measures to promote gender equity in scientific innovation, making it a critical read for policymakers and academic leaders.

摘要

本研究首次考察了中国高校教师群体学术专利申请中的性别差距,这是科研和创新可持续发展的关键问题。本研究使用了一个独特的数据集,其中包括 36 所顶尖高校生命科学相关系的 1836 名教师的专利活动和职业状况,揭示了专利动态的演变格局。在新毕业的教师中,男性教师在年度专利申请和授权数量方面的领先趋势发生了变化。女性教师提交和获得第一个专利申请的时间明显早于男性教师。然而,男性教师更有可能成为主要发明人,而且这种性别差距仍然难以缩小,女性教师更有可能是支持发明人。本研究的背景是中国大学终身教职改革和女性在生命科学领域日益增加的参与。虽然已经取得了明显的进展,但该研究揭示了持续存在的系统性障碍,这些障碍阻止了女性将其研究成果充分转化为可专利的创新。通过识别这些社会和制度障碍,我们的研究不仅揭示了性别差距,还提出了促进科技创新中性别平等的政策措施,这对于政策制定者和学术领袖来说是一个重要的参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/5a5294e6e426/pone.0307165.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/6c4ff6bd8e1e/pone.0307165.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/b6110c9eca45/pone.0307165.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/e2a08ca94b4b/pone.0307165.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/5e8645f8a0b4/pone.0307165.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/599c292c3e93/pone.0307165.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/85e51dc9691f/pone.0307165.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/5a5294e6e426/pone.0307165.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/6c4ff6bd8e1e/pone.0307165.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/b6110c9eca45/pone.0307165.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/e2a08ca94b4b/pone.0307165.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/5e8645f8a0b4/pone.0307165.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/599c292c3e93/pone.0307165.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/85e51dc9691f/pone.0307165.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f7/11251593/5a5294e6e426/pone.0307165.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences, academic patenting, and tenure-track reform in China: Evidence from life sciences at elite universities.性别差异、学术专利和中国的终身教职改革:来自顶尖大学生命科学的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307165. eCollection 2024.
2
Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences.学术生命科学领域专利申请中的性别差异。
Science. 2006 Aug 4;313(5787):665-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1124832.
3
The anatomy of medical school patenting.医学院校专利的剖析。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2049-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa067417.
4
Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender.社会科学领域教师按性别分类的留任与晋升情况的生存分析
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0143093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143093. eCollection 2015.
5
Faculty as catalysts for training new inventors: Differential outcomes for male and female PhD students.教师作为培养新发明创造者的催化剂:男性和女性博士生的不同结果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 5;120(36):e2200684120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200684120. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
The academic advantage: gender disparities in patenting.学术优势:专利申请中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128000. eCollection 2015.
7
Exploring the stability of the gender gap in faculty perceptions of gender climate at a rural regional university.探讨农村地区大学教师对性别氛围感知的性别差距的稳定性。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0301285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301285. eCollection 2024.
8
Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty.学术生命科学领域研究成果的隐瞒。来自一项针对教师的全国性调查的证据。
JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1224-8.
9
Patenting of university and non-university public research organisations in Germany: evidence from patent applications for medical research results.德国大学和非大学公共研究机构的专利:来自医学研究成果专利申请的证据。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 18;5(11):e14059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014059.
10
Patenting human genes: Chinese academic articles' portrayal of gene patents.人类基因专利:中国学术文章对基因专利的描述
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0271-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking gender discrepancies in academic promotion across STEM fields in Mexico.剖析墨西哥STEM领域学术晋升中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0324464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324464. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The Issue of Gender Bias Represented in Authorship in the Fields of Exercise and Rehabilitation: A 5-Year Research in Indexed Journals.运动与康复领域作者署名中存在的性别偏见问题:对索引期刊的五年研究
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Jan 30;8(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8010018.
2
"I am willing to do both well": Chinese academic mothers facing tension in family and career.“我愿意兼顾二者”:面临家庭与事业冲突的中国学术母亲们
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:973110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973110. eCollection 2022.
3
Women are credited less in science than men.
女性在科学领域的贡献被低估了,相比男性而言。
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7921):135-145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Collaboration enhances career progression in academic science, especially for female researchers.合作有助于学术科学领域的职业发展,尤其是对女性研究人员而言。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Sep 8;288(1958):20210219. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0219.
5
The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM.新父母在 STEM 领域职业轨迹的变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4182-4187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810862116. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
6
Gender differences in obtaining and maintaining patent rights.在获取和维持专利权方面的性别差异。
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Apr 5;36(4):307-309. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4120.
7
Long-Term Analysis of Sex Differences in Prestigious Authorships in Cardiovascular Research Supported by the National Institutes of Health.美国国立卫生研究院资助的心血管研究中著名作者性别差异的长期分析
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):880-882. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032325.
8
Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014).高影响力医学期刊中女性第一作者情况的趋势与比较:观察性研究(1994 - 2014年)
BMJ. 2016 Mar 2;352:i847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i847.
9
Developing excellence: Chinese university reform in three steps.追求卓越:中国大学改革三部曲
Nature. 2014 Oct 16;514(7522):295-6. doi: 10.1038/514295a.
10
Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.了解导致女性在科学界代表性不足的当前原因。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3157-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108. Epub 2011 Feb 7.