• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国儿童神经疾病研究重点设置。

UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions.

机构信息

Children's Neurosciences, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Dec;66(12):1590-1599. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16021. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1111/dmcn.16021
PMID:39014885
Abstract

AIM

To identify research priorities regarding the effectiveness of interventions for children and young people (CYP) with childhood neurological conditions (CNCs). These include common conditions such as epilepsies and cerebral palsy, as well as many rare conditions.

METHOD

The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) champion and facilitate priority setting partnerships (PSPs) between patients, caregivers, and clinicians (stakeholders) to identify the most important unanswered questions for research (uncertainties). A NIHR-JLA and British Paediatric Neurology Association collaboration used the JLA PSP methodology. This consisted of two surveys to stakeholders: survey 1 (to identify uncertainties) and survey 2 (a prioritization survey). The final top 10 priorities were agreed by consensus in a stakeholder workshop.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-two charities and partner organizations were invited to participate. In survey 1, 701 participants (70% non-clinicians, including CYP and parent and caregivers) submitted 1800 uncertainties from which 44 uncertainties were identified for prioritization in survey 2; from these, 1451 participants (83% non-clinicians) selected their top 10 priorities. An unweighted amalgamated score across participant roles was used to select 26. In the final workshop, 14 health care professionals, 11 parent and caregivers, and two CYP ranked the 26 questions to finalize the top 10 priorities. Ten top priority questions were identified regarding interventions to treat CYP with CNCs and their associated comorbidities, for example, sleep, emotional well-being, and distressing symptoms.

INTERPRETATION

The results of this study will inform research into the effectiveness of interventions for children with neurological conditions.

摘要

目的

确定针对儿童和青少年(CYP)患有儿童神经疾病(CNC)的干预措施的有效性的研究重点。这些疾病包括癫痫和脑瘫等常见疾病,以及许多罕见疾病。

方法

国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NIHR)和詹姆斯林德联盟(JLA)支持并促进患者、护理人员和临床医生(利益相关者)之间的优先事项设定伙伴关系(PSP),以确定研究(不确定性)最重要的未回答问题。NIHR-JLA 和英国儿科神经病学协会合作使用 JLA PSP 方法。这包括对利益相关者进行的两项调查:调查 1(确定不确定性)和调查 2(优先排序调查)。最终的前 10 项重点是在利益相关者研讨会上通过共识达成的。

结果

邀请了 132 家慈善机构和合作伙伴组织参与。在调查 1 中,701 名参与者(70%是非临床医生,包括 CYP 和父母和照顾者)提交了 1800 个不确定性,从中确定了 44 个不确定性用于调查 2 的优先级;其中,1451 名参与者(83%是非临床医生)选择了他们的前 10 个重点。使用跨参与者角色的未加权综合得分来选择 26 个。在最后一次研讨会上,14 名医疗保健专业人员、11 名父母和照顾者以及两名 CYP 将这 26 个问题进行排名,以确定前 10 个重点。确定了 10 个针对治疗 CNC 和相关共病(例如睡眠、情绪健康和令人痛苦的症状)的 CYP 的干预措施的重点问题。

解释

这项研究的结果将为针对神经疾病儿童的干预措施的有效性研究提供信息。

相似文献

1
UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions.英国儿童神经疾病研究重点设置。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Dec;66(12):1590-1599. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16021. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
The top 10 research priorities in psoriatic arthritis: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.银屑病关节炎的 10 项首要研究重点:詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Aug 1;62(8):2716-2723. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac676.
3
Setting research priorities to improve the health of children and young people with neurodisability: a British Academy of Childhood Disability-James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.确定研究重点,以改善患有神经残疾的儿童和年轻人的健康:英国儿童残疾学会-詹姆斯·林德联盟研究重点制定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 28;5(1):e006233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006233.
4
Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership.探索合作中确定卫生研究重点的挑战:对詹姆斯·林德联盟压疮重点确定合作项目所采用方法的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 2;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y. eCollection 2016.
5
Top 10 research priorities for digital technology for adolescents and young persons with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.青少年和年轻炎症性肠病患者数字技术研究重点 10 项:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系的结果。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 Mar;78(3):670-676. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12105. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
6
Research priorities in foot and ankle conditions: results of a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.足部和踝关节疾病的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟合作的优先事项设定结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 16;13(5):e070641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070641.
7
Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis.调整詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定流程以更好地支持患者参与:来自囊性纤维化的一个例子。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 20;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0159-x. eCollection 2019.
8
Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership.确定和优先考虑患有听觉过敏症人群的未解决研究问题:詹姆斯林德联盟听觉过敏优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178.
9
Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肝糖原贮积病的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项确定合作项目
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12178. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Identifying Priorities for Physiotherapy Research in the UK: the James Lind Alliance Physiotherapy Priority Setting Partnership.确定英国物理治疗研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟物理治疗重点制定伙伴关系。
Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge mapping and emerging trends in pediatric hemiplegia research: a bibliometric study spanning 1982-2025.小儿偏瘫研究中的知识图谱与新兴趋势:一项涵盖1982年至2025年的文献计量学研究
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 17;16:1590937. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1590937. eCollection 2025.
2
Measuring what really matters: Why developing patient-reported outcome measures in Duchenne muscular dystrophy should involve patients and caregivers.衡量真正重要的东西:为何在杜氏肌营养不良症中开发患者报告的结局指标应让患者和护理人员参与其中。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Jul;67(7):832-833. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16225. Epub 2024 Dec 31.