• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于班加罗尔市区三级医疗中心抗狂犬病诊所动物咬伤受害者的求医行为及暴露后预防措施的前瞻性研究。

A prospective study on health seeking behaviour and post exposure prophylaxis received by animal bite victims at the anti-rabies clinic in a tertiary care centre of urban Bangalore.

作者信息

Surendran Jithin, Hs Ravish, Kumari Nitu, M Prasanth Ramya, Fotedar Nidhi

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560002, India.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Mar 11;13:175. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145673.1. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.145673.1
PMID:39015143
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11249507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rabies is 100% preventable by administering early and complete post exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Animal bite victims must have the knowledge and attitude necessary to seek appropriate medical care at the earliest to receive the required PEP.

OBJECTIVES

The present study sought to ascertain the health-seeking behavior of animal bite victims, their knowledge and attitude regarding rabies prophylaxis, the PEP they received, and their level of compliance with the full course of anti-rabies vaccination.

METHODS

The study included animal bite cases that presented to the anti-rabies clinic and matched the eligibility criteria. All the required details were recorded using an internally validated structured questionnaire. All participants were followed up for six months to ensure their health conditions and compliance with the vaccination schedule.

RESULTS

Out of 1058 respondents, 57.9% were adults, with 46.6% belonging to middle socioeconomic class. 91.1% of them were informed biting animals as dogs. Before arriving at the anti-rabies clinic, 93.3% of the study subjects washed their wounds, and 62.4% visited to another health facility. Rabies knowledge was inadequate among the study participants, only 54.8% being mindful about the disease and its prevention. The compliance with the full course of antirabies vaccination was found to be 77.9%. All subjects were healthy, confirming that PEP is safe and effective.

CONCLUSION

Regular social and behavioral change communication (SBCC) needs to be implemented with regard to health-seeking behavior.

摘要

背景

通过尽早并完整地进行暴露后预防(PEP),狂犬病是100%可预防的。动物咬伤受害者必须具备尽早寻求适当医疗护理以接受所需PEP的必要知识和态度。

目的

本研究旨在确定动物咬伤受害者的就医行为、他们对狂犬病预防的知识和态度、他们接受的PEP以及他们对全程抗狂犬病疫苗接种的依从程度。

方法

该研究纳入了到抗狂犬病诊所就诊且符合入选标准的动物咬伤病例。所有所需细节均使用内部验证的结构化问卷进行记录。对所有参与者进行了为期六个月的随访,以确保他们的健康状况和对疫苗接种计划的依从性。

结果

在1058名受访者中,57.9%为成年人,其中46.6%属于中等社会经济阶层。他们中91.1%被告知咬人的动物是狗。在到达抗狂犬病诊所之前,93.3%的研究对象清洗了伤口,62.4%的人去了另一家医疗机构。研究参与者对狂犬病的知识不足,只有54.8%的人了解这种疾病及其预防方法。发现全程抗狂犬病疫苗接种的依从率为77.9%。所有受试者均健康,证实PEP是安全有效的。

结论

需要就就医行为定期开展社会和行为改变沟通(SBCC)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e99f/11249507/e50c19cd52ca/f1000research-13-159650-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e99f/11249507/e50c19cd52ca/f1000research-13-159650-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e99f/11249507/e50c19cd52ca/f1000research-13-159650-g0000.jpg

相似文献

1
A prospective study on health seeking behaviour and post exposure prophylaxis received by animal bite victims at the anti-rabies clinic in a tertiary care centre of urban Bangalore.一项关于班加罗尔市区三级医疗中心抗狂犬病诊所动物咬伤受害者的求医行为及暴露后预防措施的前瞻性研究。
F1000Res. 2024 Mar 11;13:175. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145673.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Health-seeking behavior and compliance to post exposure prophylaxis among animal bite victims in India.印度动物咬伤受害者的求诊行为和接触后预防措施的依从性。
Indian J Public Health. 2019 Sep;63(Supplement):S20-S25. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_364_19.
3
Rabies post-exposure healthcare-seeking behaviors and perceptions: Results from a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey, Uganda, 2013.狂犬病暴露后寻求医疗保健的行为和认知:来自 2013 年乌干达知识、态度和实践调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0251702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251702. eCollection 2021.
4
Determinants of health seeking behaviour following rabies exposure in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚狂犬病暴露后就医行为的决定因素。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2018 Jun;65(4):443-453. doi: 10.1111/zph.12458. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
5
Human rabies post exposure prophylaxis at the Pasteur Institute of Dakar, Senegal: trends and risk factors.塞内加尔达喀尔巴斯德研究所人狂犬病暴露后预防:趋势和危险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3928-0.
6
Determinants of health seeking behavior of animal bite victims in rabies endemic South Bhutan: a community-based contact-tracing survey.影响动物咬伤患者在南不丹狂犬病流行地区寻求医疗服务行为的因素:基于社区的接触者追踪调查。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 27;19(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6559-x.
7
Prevalence of delayed initiation of rabies postexposure prophylaxis and factors influencing it among animal bite victims from Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦东部动物咬伤受害者中狂犬病暴露后预防起始延迟的流行情况及其影响因素。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jun 4;118(6):399-404. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trae002.
8
Epidemiology and surveillance of human animal-bite injuries and rabies post-exposure prophylaxis, in selected counties in Kenya, 2011-2016.肯尼亚部分县 2011-2016 年人间动物咬伤和狂犬病暴露后预防的流行病学和监测。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 9;18(1):996. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5888-5.
9
Improper wound treatment and delay of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis of animal bite victims in China: Prevalence and determinants.中国动物咬伤受害者伤口处理不当及狂犬病暴露后预防延迟的情况:患病率及影响因素
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 10;11(7):e0005663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005663. eCollection 2017 Jul.
10
Determinants of delay in initiating post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies prevention among animal bite cases: hospital based study.动物咬伤后延迟启动狂犬病预防的影响因素:基于医院的研究。
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 17;32(1):74-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.067. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Oxidized Mannan: A Novel Adjuvant Candidate for Enhancing Immune Responses in Veterinary Rabies Vaccine.氧化甘露聚糖:一种用于增强兽用狂犬病疫苗免疫反应的新型佐剂候选物。
Chonnam Med J. 2025 May;61(2):84-89. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2025.61.2.84. Epub 2025 May 23.
2
Factors influencing vaccination of dogs against rabies in South Mugirango Sub-County-Kisii County; Kenya.影响肯尼亚基苏木县南穆吉兰戈次县犬类狂犬病疫苗接种的因素
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004194. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-seeking behavior and compliance to post exposure prophylaxis among animal bite victims in India.印度动物咬伤受害者的求诊行为和接触后预防措施的依从性。
Indian J Public Health. 2019 Sep;63(Supplement):S20-S25. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_364_19.
2
Four Thousand Years of Concepts Relating to Rabies in Animals and Humans, Its Prevention and Its Cure.四千年来关于动物和人类狂犬病的概念、预防及治疗
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 24;2(2):5. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed2020005.
3
Introduction of intradermal rabies vaccination - A paradigm shift in improving post-exposure prophylaxis in Asia.
皮内狂犬病疫苗接种介绍 - 改善亚洲暴露后预防的范式转变。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 3;37 Suppl 1:A94-A98. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.034. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
4
New global strategic plan to eliminate dog-mediated rabies by 2030.到2030年消除犬介导狂犬病的新全球战略计划。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Aug;6(8):e828-e829. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30302-4. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
Compliance to anti-rabies vaccination in post-exposure prophylaxis.暴露后预防中狂犬病疫苗接种的依从性。
Indian J Public Health. 2015 Jan-Mar;59(1):58-60. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.152867.
6
An epidemiological study of animal bites in India: results of a WHO sponsored national multi-centric rabies survey.印度动物咬伤的流行病学研究:世界卫生组织赞助的全国多中心狂犬病调查结果
J Commun Dis. 2006 Mar;38(1):32-9.
7
Assessing the burden of human rabies in India: results of a national multi-center epidemiological survey.评估印度人间狂犬病负担:一项全国多中心流行病学调查结果
Int J Infect Dis. 2007 Jan;11(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.10.007. Epub 2006 May 4.
8
Rabies control in South and Southeast Asia.南亚和东南亚的狂犬病防控
Vaccine. 2005 Mar 18;23(17-18):2284-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.030.