• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔与多孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术的疗效:一项关于电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术治疗肺癌的多中心随机对照试验的数据

Outcomes of single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: Data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

作者信息

Lim Eric, Harris Rosie A, Batchelor Tim, Casali Gianluca, Krishnadas Rakesh, Begum Sofina, Jordan Simon, Dunning Joel, Paul Ian, Shackcloth Michael, Feeney Sarah, Anikin Vladimir, Mcgonigle Niall, Fallouh Hazem, Hernandez Luis, Di Chiara Franscesco, Stavroulias Dionisios, Loubani Mahmoud, Qadri Syed, Zamvar Vipin, Marshall Lucy, Kaur Surinder, Rogers Chris A

机构信息

Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2024 Apr 4;19:296-308. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.025. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.025
PMID:39015471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11247214/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Surgery through a single port may be less painful because access is supplied by 1 intercostal nerve or more painful because multiple instruments are used in 1 port. We analyzed data collected from the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group of a randomized controlled trial to compare differences in pain up to 1 year.

METHODS

Groups were compared in a prespecified exploratory analysis using direct (regression) and indirect comparison (difference with respect to thoracotomy). In-hospital visual analogue scale pain scores were used, and analgesic ratios were calculated. After discharge, pain was evaluated using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires-Core 30 scores up to 1 year.

RESULTS

From July 2015 to February 2019, we randomized 503 participants. After excluding 50 participants who did not receive lobectomy, surgery was performed using a single port in 42 participants (predominately by a single surgeon), multiple ports in 166 participants, and thoracotomy in 245 participants. No differences were observed in-hospital between single- and multiple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery when modeled using a direct comparison, mean difference of -0.24 (95% CI, -1.06 to 0.58) or indirect comparison, mean difference of -0.33 (-1.16 to 0.51). Mean analgesic ratio (single/multiple port) was 0.75 (0.64 to 0.87) for direct comparison and 0.90 (0.64 to 1.25) for indirect comparison. After discharge, pain for single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was lower than for multiple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (first 3 months), and corresponding physical function was higher up to 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no consistent differences for in-hospital pain when lobectomy was undertaken using 1 or multiple ports. However, better pain scores and physical function were observed for single-port surgery after discharge.

摘要

目的

单孔手术可能因仅由1条肋间神经提供通路而疼痛较轻,也可能因在1个孔道中使用多种器械而疼痛较重。我们分析了一项随机对照试验的电视辅助胸腔镜手术组收集的数据,以比较长达1年的疼痛差异。

方法

在预先设定的探索性分析中,使用直接(回归)和间接比较(相对于开胸手术的差异)对各组进行比较。采用住院期间视觉模拟量表疼痛评分,并计算镇痛率。出院后,使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30项评分对长达1年的疼痛进行评估。

结果

2015年7月至2019年2月,我们将503名参与者随机分组。排除50名未接受肺叶切除术的参与者后,42名参与者采用单孔进行手术(主要由1名外科医生操作),166名参与者采用多孔进行手术,245名参与者采用开胸手术。在采用直接比较建模时,单孔和多孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术在住院期间未观察到差异,平均差异为-0.24(95%CI,-1.06至0.58);采用间接比较时,平均差异为-0.33(-1.16至0.51)。直接比较的平均镇痛率(单孔/多孔)为0.75(0.64至0.87),间接比较为0.90(0.64至1.25)。出院后,单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术的疼痛低于多孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(前3个月),并且在长达12个月的时间里相应的身体功能更高。

结论

采用单孔或多孔进行肺叶切除术时,住院期间的疼痛没有一致的差异。然而,出院后单孔手术的疼痛评分和身体功能更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89b/11247214/3e7f4cf6b374/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89b/11247214/3e7f4cf6b374/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89b/11247214/3e7f4cf6b374/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: Data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.单孔与多孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术的疗效:一项关于电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术治疗肺癌的多中心随机对照试验的数据
JTCVS Open. 2024 Apr 4;19:296-308. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.025. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与前外侧开胸术行肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌的术后疼痛与生活质量比较:一项随机对照研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):836-844. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X. Epub 2016 May 6.
3
Management of post-operative pain by placement of an intraoperative intercostal catheter after single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity-score matched study.单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术后通过放置术中肋间导管管理术后疼痛:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1087-93. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.01.
4
Pain following thoracoscopic surgery: retrospective analysis between single-incision and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.胸腔镜手术后疼痛:单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术的回顾性分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jun 12;8:153. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-153.
5
Comparison of the perioperative efficacy between single-port and two-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery anatomical lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔与两孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术解剖性肺切除治疗非小细胞肺癌的围手术期疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(7):2763-2773. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.12.
6
Quality of life after partial lung resection with uniportal versus 3-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study.单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺部分切除术患者术后生活质量的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Today. 2021 Nov;51(11):1755-1763. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02294-6. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
The perioperative outcomes of uniport versus two-port and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔与双孔、三孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗肺癌的围手术期结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Nov 8;17(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-02034-y.
8
Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between uniportal subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.剑突下单孔与肋间电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛及生活质量的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jul;12(7):3582-3590. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-425.
9
Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer.单操作孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)与三操作孔VATS治疗非小细胞肺癌的比较
Oncol Lett. 2019 Aug;18(2):1311-1317. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10394. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus other video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques: a randomized study.单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与其他电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除技术的比较:一项随机研究
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;50(3):411-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw161. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Study on the Original and Modified Techniques for Lung Anatomic Resections.单孔机器人辅助胸外科手术的发展:一项关于肺解剖性切除的原始技术与改良技术的回顾性研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2025 Jun;16(12):e70085. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70085.
2
Initial outcomes with uniportal video-assisted lung resection.单孔电视辅助肺切除术的初步结果。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 May 6;40(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf111.
3
Uniportal video-assisted lung resection versus robotic-assisted lung resection, is there a difference?

本文引用的文献

1
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic or Open Lobectomy in Early-Stage Lung Cancer.胸腔镜辅助或开放性肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌。
NEJM Evid. 2022 Mar;1(3):EVIDoa2100016. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100016. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
2
Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery pulmonary lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer (UNIT trial): study protocol of a single-center randomized trial.单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌(UNIT试验):一项单中心随机试验的研究方案
Trials. 2021 Feb 25;22(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05115-w.
3
Study protocol for VIdeo assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus conventional Open LobEcTomy for lung cancer, a UK multicentre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot (the VIOLET study).
单孔电视辅助肺切除术与机器人辅助肺切除术,有区别吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):7539-7545. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-919. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
VIdeo 辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统开胸肺叶切除术治疗肺癌的研究方案:一项英国多中心随机对照试验,包含内部预试验(VIOLET 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 14;9(10):e029507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029507.
4
Single-incision versus multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单切口与多端口电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗肺癌的系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Chir Belg. 2018 Apr;118(2):85-93. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1379800. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
One, two, three or four ports… does it matter? Priorities in lung cancer surgery.一个、两个、三个还是四个端口……这重要吗?肺癌手术的优先事项。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Dec;8(12):E1704-E1708. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.12.86.
6
Assessing the Correlation Between Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Advanced Lung Cancer.评估晚期肺癌患者身体活动与生活质量之间的相关性。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Mar;17(1):73-79. doi: 10.1177/1534735416684016. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
7
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus other video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques: a randomized study.单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与其他电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除技术的比较:一项随机研究
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;50(3):411-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw161. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.间接比较在评估竞争性干预措施疗效方面的有效性:来自已发表的荟萃分析的实证证据。
BMJ. 2003 Mar 1;326(7387):472. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.472.