Galante Julieta, Montero-Marín Jesús, Vainre Maris, Dufour Géraldine, García-Campayo Javier, Jones Peter B
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. (second affiliation: Contemplative Studies Centre, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia).
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (second affiliation: Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain; third affiliation: Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health - CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain).
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 17;19(7):e0305928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305928. eCollection 2024.
Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) have shown beneficial effects on mental health. There is emerging evidence that MBPs may also be associated with marked deviations in the subjective experience of waking consciousness. We aimed to explore whether MBPs can have a causal role in different types of such states.
We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (ACTRN12615001160527). University of Cambridge students without severe mental illness were randomised to an 8-week MBP plus mental health support as usual (SAU), or to SAU alone. We adapted the Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (OAV, 0-100-point range) to assess spontaneous experiences in daily life, and included it as a post-hoc secondary outcome at the end of the one-year follow-up questionnaire. Two-part model analyses compared trial arms, and estimated dose-response effects of formal (meditation) and informal (daily activities) mindfulness practice during the year. Sensitivity analyses correcting for multiple comparisons were conducted.
We randomised 670 participants; 205 (33%) completed the OAV. In comparison with SAU, MBP participants experienced unity more frequently and intensively (two-part marginal effect (ME) = 6.26 OAV scale points, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.24, 10.27, p = 0.006, Cohen's d = 0.33) and disembodiment more frequently (ME = 4.84, 95% CI = 0.86, 8.83, p = 0.019, Cohen's d = 0.26). Formal practice predicted spiritual, blissful and unity experiences, insightfulness, disembodiment, and changed meanings. Informal practice predicted unity and blissful experiences. Trial arm comparisons and informal practice effects lost significance after corrections for multiple comparisons, but formal practice dose-response effects remained significant.
Results provide a novel suggestion of causal links between mindfulness practice and specific altered states of consciousness. To optimise their impact, practitioners and teachers need to anticipate and handle them appropriately. Future studies need to confirm findings and assess mechanisms and clinical implications.
基于正念的项目(MBPs)已显示出对心理健康有益。有新证据表明,MBPs 可能还与清醒意识的主观体验中的显著偏差有关。我们旨在探讨 MBPs 是否能在不同类型的此类状态中发挥因果作用。
我们进行了一项实用的随机对照试验(ACTRN12615001160527)。将没有严重精神疾病的剑桥大学学生随机分为两组,一组接受为期 8 周的 MBPs 并照常获得心理健康支持(SAU),另一组仅接受 SAU。我们对意识状态改变评定量表(OAV,0 - 100 分范围)进行了调整,以评估日常生活中的自发体验,并将其作为一年随访问卷末尾的事后次要结果纳入。两部分模型分析比较了试验组,并估计了一年中正式(冥想)和非正式(日常活动)正念练习的剂量反应效应。进行了校正多重比较的敏感性分析。
我们随机分配了 670 名参与者;205 人(33%)完成了 OAV 评定。与 SAU 组相比,MBP 组参与者更频繁、更强烈地体验到合一感(两部分边际效应(ME)= 6.26 个 OAV 量表点,95%置信区间(CI)= 2.24,10.27,p = 0.006,科恩 d = 0.33),且更频繁地体验到脱离身体感(ME = 4.84,95%CI = 0.86,8.83,p = 0.019,科恩 d = 0.26)。正式练习可预测精神、极乐和合一体验、洞察力、脱离身体感以及意义改变。非正式练习可预测合一和极乐体验。校正多重比较后,试验组比较和非正式练习效应失去显著性,但正式练习剂量反应效应仍然显著。
结果为正念练习与特定意识改变状态之间的因果联系提供了新的提示。为了优化其影响,从业者和教师需要适当地预测和处理这些状态。未来的研究需要证实这些发现,并评估其机制和临床意义。