• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助经皮螺钉固定在骨盆骨折微创治疗中的疗效分析

Analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation in the minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures.

作者信息

Wang Mige, Zheng Song, Zhang Yushan, Lu Jialing

机构信息

Department of Traumatic and Pediatric Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2024 Jul 3;11:1392719. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1392719. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1392719
PMID:39022596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11251939/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted and manual screw placement techniques for the treatment of pelvic fractures.

METHODS

This study included patients with pelvic fractures admitted to our orthopedic department between January 2020 and January 2022. They were randomly assigned to either the robot-assisted group or the control group. Various parameters, including surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding, fluoroscopy frequency, postoperative pain, length of hospitalization, postoperative hematological indices, postoperative functional scores, and postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative hematological parameters between the two groups. The robot-assisted group exhibited significantly shorter surgical duration, lower fluoroscopy frequencies, lower postoperative pain scores, and shorter length of hospitalization compared to the control group. At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, patients in the robot-assisted group demonstrated significantly higher Majeed functional scores in comparison to the control group. However, there were no significant differences in Majeed scores at 12 months postoperatively. Moreover, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures using hollow screws effectively reduced surgical duration, mitigated intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain, shortened hospital stays, and promoted faster functional recovery.

摘要

目的

比较机器人辅助与手动螺钉置入技术治疗骨盆骨折的疗效。

方法

本研究纳入2020年1月至2022年1月间我院骨科收治的骨盆骨折患者。将他们随机分为机器人辅助组和对照组。比较两组的各项参数,包括手术时长、术中出血量、透视次数、术后疼痛、住院时间、术后血液学指标、术后功能评分及术后并发症。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数及术前血液学参数无显著差异。与对照组相比,机器人辅助组的手术时长显著缩短,透视次数更低,术后疼痛评分更低,住院时间更短。术后3个月和6个月时,机器人辅助组患者的马吉德功能评分显著高于对照组。然而,术后12个月时马吉德评分无显著差异。此外,两组术后并发症无显著差异。

结论

使用空心螺钉机器人辅助微创治疗骨盆骨折可有效缩短手术时长,减少术中出血和术后疼痛,缩短住院时间,并促进功能更快恢复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6834/11251939/c030f14fde48/fsurg-11-1392719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6834/11251939/33b793baf6ab/fsurg-11-1392719-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6834/11251939/8d871baae6dd/fsurg-11-1392719-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6834/11251939/c030f14fde48/fsurg-11-1392719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6834/11251939/33b793baf6ab/fsurg-11-1392719-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6834/11251939/8d871baae6dd/fsurg-11-1392719-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6834/11251939/c030f14fde48/fsurg-11-1392719-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation in the minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures.机器人辅助经皮螺钉固定在骨盆骨折微创治疗中的疗效分析
Front Surg. 2024 Jul 3;11:1392719. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1392719. eCollection 2024.
2
Robot-assisted percutaneous screw placement combined with pelvic internal fixator for minimally invasive treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures.机器人辅助经皮螺钉置入联合骨盆内固定器微创治疗不稳定骨盆环骨折
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Oct;14(5):e1927. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1927. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
3
Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统经皮骶髂螺钉固定治疗骨盆后环损伤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jan;33(1):9-20. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
4
Robot-assisted Minimally-invasive Internal Fixation of Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Single-center Experience.机器人辅助微创骨盆环损伤内固定术:单中心经验
Orthop Surg. 2019 Feb;11(1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/os.12423. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
5
[Clinical research on robot-assisted percutaneous pelvic and acetabular screws surgery].机器人辅助经皮骨盆及髋臼螺钉手术的临床研究
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Apr 18;49(2):274-280.
6
The efficacy of "TiRobot"orthopaedic robot-assisted VS conventional fluoroscopic percutaneous screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint.“TiRobot”骨科机器人辅助与传统透视经皮骶髂关节螺钉固定的疗效比较。
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05655-z. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
7
[Clinical application of Orthopedic Tianji Robot in surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fracture].骨科天玑机器人在胸腰椎骨折手术治疗中的临床应用
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Jul 25;34(11):1034-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.11.010.
8
Percutaneous robot-assisted screw fixation for nondisplaced pelvic fractures: a good choice?经皮机器人辅助螺钉固定治疗无移位骨盆骨折:一个好的选择?
Int Orthop. 2023 Jun;47(6):1601-1608. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05794-x. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
9
Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures with Cannulated Screw Invasive Internal Fixation Assisted by Orthopaedic Surgery Robot Positioning System.骨科手术机器人定位系统辅助空心螺钉微创内固定治疗股骨颈骨折。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):864-872. doi: 10.1111/os.12548.
10
Does robot-assisted percutaneous hollow screw placement combined with tarsal sinus incision reduction in the treatment of calcaneal fracture perform better at a minimum two year follow-up compared with traditional surgical reduction and fixation?机器人辅助经皮空心螺钉置入联合跗骨窦切口复位治疗跟骨骨折与传统手术复位内固定相比,在至少 2 年的随访中效果更好吗?
Int Orthop. 2023 Jun;47(6):1575-1581. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05752-7. Epub 2023 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in the USA from 2007 to 2014.美国 2007 年至 2014 年骨盆和髋臼骨折的流行病学研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Mar;34(3):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06636-z. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
2
TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a meta‑analysis.机器人辅助与传统透视辅助经皮骶髂螺钉固定治疗骨盆环损伤:荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 5;17(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03420-x.
3
Autonomous path planning for robot-assisted pelvic fracture closed reduction with collision avoidance.
机器人辅助骨盆骨折闭合复位的自主路径规划与避碰。
Int J Med Robot. 2023 Apr;19(2):e2483. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2483. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
4
Robot-Assisted Autonomous Reduction of a Displaced Pelvic Fracture: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review.机器人辅助自主复位移位骨盆骨折:一例报告及文献简要综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 14;11(6):1598. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061598.
5
Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统经皮骶髂螺钉固定治疗骨盆后环损伤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jan;33(1):9-20. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France.法国骨盆和髋臼骨折的流行病学。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Sep;106(5):831-839. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
7
Medical Robotics in Bone Fracture Reduction Surgery: A Review.医学机器人在骨折复位手术中的应用:综述
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Aug 18;19(16):3593. doi: 10.3390/s19163593.
8
Evolution and Current Applications of Robot-Assisted Fracture Reduction: A Comprehensive Review.机器人辅助骨折复位的演变及现状应用:全面综述。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Jan;48(1):203-224. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02332-y. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
9
Hands-on robot-assisted fracture reduction system guided by a linear guidance constraints controller using a pre-operatively planned goal pose.由线性引导约束控制器引导的、使用术前规划目标位姿的手动机器人辅助骨折复位系统。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Apr;15(2):e1967. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1967. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
Intra- and postoperative complications of navigated and conventional techniques in percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after pelvic fractures: Results from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry.骨盆骨折后经皮髂骶螺钉固定中导航技术与传统技术的术中和术后并发症:来自德国骨盆创伤登记处的结果
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1765-72. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 15.