向他们展示资金：关于改革临床试验参与者补偿的多利益相关方视角。 - Suppr

Show them the money: a multi-stakeholder perspective on reforming clinical trial participant compensation.

作者信息

Esiason Gunnar, Pontius Angela, Gelinas Luke

出版信息

Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024 Dec;23(12):881-882. doi: 10.1038/d41573-024-00107-2.

DOI:10.1038/d41573-024-00107-2

PMID:39026039

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Show them the money: a multi-stakeholder perspective on reforming clinical trial participant compensation.

Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024 Dec;23(12):881-882. doi: 10.1038/d41573-024-00107-2.

Can money heal all wounds? Social exchange norm modulates the preference for monetary versus social compensation.

Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 23;6:1411. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01411. eCollection 2015.

Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?

Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011069. Epub 2021 May 2.

Reforming the countermeasures injury compensation program for COVID-19 and beyond: An economic perspective.

J Law Biosci. 2022 Apr 4;9(1):lsac008. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac008. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.

Plasma-based multi-reforming for Gas-To-Liquid: tuning the plasma chemistry towards methanol.

Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 29;8(1):15929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34359-x.

Evidencing the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses: a multi-stakeholder perspective on study requirements.

Front Health Serv. 2023 Dec 21;3:1213752. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1213752. eCollection 2023.

Shared Decision-Making as a Tool for Navigating Multi-Stakeholder Discrepancies in Youth Psychotherapy.

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2023 Jan-Feb;52(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2127105. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

Multi-stakeholder perspectives in defining health-services quality in cataract care.

Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):470-476. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx048.

A protocol for stakeholder engagement in deliver-EE: A pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;141:107535. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107535. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

Breaking the Cycle of Marginalization: How to Involve Local Communities in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives?

J Bus Ethics. 2022 Sep 22:1-32. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05252-5.

引用本文的文献

A clinical study of efficacy and safety of the Carry Life UF system in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study.

BMC Nephrol. 2025 Apr 3;26(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04095-2.

本文引用的文献

Fair payment and just benefits to enhance diversity in clinical research.

J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 14;5(1):e159. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.816. eCollection 2021.

A Framework for Ethical Payment to Research Participants.

N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):766-771. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1710591.

Paying Research Participants: Regulatory Uncertainty, Conceptual Confusion, and a Path Forward.

Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2017 Winter;17(1):61-141.

Informative inducement: study payment as a signal of risk.

Soc Sci Med. 2010 Feb;70(3):455-464. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.047. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

Empirical assessment of whether moderate payments are undue or unjust inducements for participation in clinical trials.

Arch Intern Med. 2004 Apr 12;164(7):801-3. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.7.801.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

Show them the money: a multi-stakeholder perspective on reforming clinical trial participant compensation.

作者信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献