Suppr超能文献

人体体内胰岛素作用的评估:胰岛素钳夹技术与最小模型技术的比较。

Estimates of in vivo insulin action in humans: comparison of the insulin clamp and the minimal model techniques.

作者信息

Foley J E, Chen Y D, Lardinois C K, Hollenbeck C B, Liu G C, Reaven G M

出版信息

Horm Metab Res. 1985 Aug;17(8):406-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013559.

Abstract

The insulin clamp technique, which is often assumed to measure the ability of insulin to stimulate glucose uptake, actually measures both insulin-independent and insulin-dependent glucose uptake. In contrast, the minimal model technique, recently introduced by Bergman, Philips and Cobelli (1981), attempts to directly estimate insulin sensitivity (insulin-dependent glucose uptake = S1) by measurement of plasma glucose and insulin values during a 3 hour intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). In the present study estimates of insulin action derived from the insulin clamp and the minimal model technique were compared in 20 humans with varying degrees of glucose tolerance. The insulin response during the IVGTT was too low to permit calculation of S1 in 5 subjects - 4 with Type II diabetes and 1 with normal glucose tolerance. Although the correlation coefficient between the two tests in the other 15 patients was statistically significant (r = 0.53, P less than 0.05), this statement is somewhat misleading. Thus, S1 in the 4/7 patients with Type II diabetes in whom it could be measured was zero, and the correlation between estimates of insulin action with the two techniques in the 11 non-diabetic patients was not statistically significant (r = 0.41, P = NS) when these 4 patients were removed from the analysis. In conclusion, these data indicate that there was only a weak correlation between estimates of insulin action assessed with the insulin clamp and the minimal model techniques. One explanation for this observation is that the insulin-independent component of total glucose disposal both varies widely among patients and contributes significantly to glucose uptake as assessed by the insulin clamp technique.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

胰岛素钳夹技术通常被认为是用于测量胰岛素刺激葡萄糖摄取的能力,但实际上它测量的是胰岛素非依赖和胰岛素依赖的葡萄糖摄取。相比之下,伯格曼、菲利普斯和科贝利(1981年)最近引入的最小模型技术,试图通过在3小时静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)期间测量血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素值,直接估计胰岛素敏感性(胰岛素依赖的葡萄糖摄取 = S1)。在本研究中,对20名葡萄糖耐量不同的人,比较了胰岛素钳夹技术和最小模型技术得出的胰岛素作用估计值。在5名受试者中,IVGTT期间的胰岛素反应过低,无法计算S1,其中4名患有II型糖尿病,1名葡萄糖耐量正常。虽然其他15名患者中两种测试之间的相关系数具有统计学意义(r = 0.53,P < 0.05),但这种说法有点误导性。因此,在4/7名可测量S1的II型糖尿病患者中,S1为零,当将这4名患者从分析中剔除时,11名非糖尿病患者中两种技术的胰岛素作用估计值之间的相关性无统计学意义(r = 0.41,P = 无显著性差异)。总之,这些数据表明,胰岛素钳夹技术和最小模型技术评估的胰岛素作用估计值之间只有微弱的相关性。对此观察结果的一种解释是,总葡萄糖处置的胰岛素非依赖成分在患者之间差异很大,并且对胰岛素钳夹技术评估的葡萄糖摄取有显著贡献。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验