Computer-aided diagnosis system for grading brain tumor using histopathology images based on color and texture features.

BACKGROUND

Cancer pathology shows disease development and associated molecular features. It provides extensive phenotypic information that is cancer-predictive and has potential implications for planning treatment. Based on the exceptional performance of computational approaches in the field of digital pathogenic, the use of rich phenotypic information in digital pathology images has enabled us to identify low-level gliomas (LGG) from high-grade gliomas (HGG). Because the differences between the textures are so slight, utilizing just one feature or a small number of features produces poor categorization results.

METHODS

In this work, multiple feature extraction methods that can extract distinct features from the texture of histopathology image data are used to compare the classification outcomes. The successful feature extraction algorithms GLCM, LBP, multi-LBGLCM, GLRLM, color moment features, and RSHD have been chosen in this paper. LBP and GLCM algorithms are combined to create LBGLCM. The LBGLCM feature extraction approach is extended in this study to multiple scales using an image pyramid, which is defined by sampling the image both in space and scale. The preprocessing stage is first used to enhance the contrast of the images and remove noise and illumination effects. The feature extraction stage is then carried out to extract several important features (texture and color) from histopathology images. Third, the feature fusion and reduction step is put into practice to decrease the number of features that are processed, reducing the computation time of the suggested system. The classification stage is created at the end to categorize various brain cancer grades. We performed our analysis on the 821 whole-slide pathology images from glioma patients in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Two types of brain cancer are included in the dataset: GBM and LGG (grades II and III). 506 GBM images and 315 LGG images are included in our analysis, guaranteeing representation of various tumor grades and histopathological features.

RESULTS

The fusion of textural and color characteristics was validated in the glioma patients using the 10-fold cross-validation technique with an accuracy equals to 95.8%, sensitivity equals to 96.4%, DSC equals to 96.7%, and specificity equals to 97.1%. The combination of the color and texture characteristics produced significantly better accuracy, which supported their synergistic significance in the predictive model. The result indicates that the textural characteristics can be an objective, accurate, and comprehensive glioma prediction when paired with conventional imagery.

CONCLUSION

The results outperform current approaches for identifying LGG from HGG and provide competitive performance in classifying four categories of glioma in the literature. The proposed model can help stratify patients in clinical studies, choose patients for targeted therapy, and customize specific treatment schedules.