• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输血知情同意书问卷的编制与验证

Development and validation of informed consent for blood transfusion questionnaire.

作者信息

Senin Mohd Hilmi, Sopian Mastura Mohd, Shaharuddin Bakiah, Nasir Muhammad Jaffri Mohd

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Sultanah Aminah, 80100, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.

Department of Community Health, Advanced Medical & Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 13200, Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Asian J Transfus Sci. 2024 Jan-Jun;18(1):35-44. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_176_21. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_176_21
PMID:39036701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11259331/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Blood transfusion warrants written informed consent from the patient. However, patients have poor knowledge regarding blood transfusions as evidenced by nonstandardized information retained by patients from the informed consent discussion. The problem stems from suboptimal patient knowledge on the elements of informed consent. This study describes the development and validation of a new questionnaire to assess the knowledge on informed consent for blood transfusion from the patients' perspective.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The development phase consisted of literature review, small group discussion, expert review meeting, content, and face validity. We evaluated the psychometric properties of Informed Consent for Blood Transfusion Questionnaire (ICBTQ) using reliability test and item response theory among a sample of 95 patients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.

RESULTS

ICBTQ was formulated to include sociodemographic and knowledge sections. ICBTQ possessed excellent content validity. The face validity index (FVI) of clarity and comprehension were both 0.97. Thus, the universal FVI was 0.96. One item was added following the advice given by one of the content experts. ICBTQ had excellent face validity. For the validation phase, ICBTQ demonstrated an acceptable Cronbach's Alpha value. One item was omitted in view of low corrected item-total correlation. In the item response theory (IRT) analysis, ICBTQ exhibited good difficulty and discriminatory indexes. Assessments of item-fit indicated that all items of the model were well-fitted.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the IRT and reliability analysis, the knowledge section of the ICBTQ was psychometrically valid to be used among patients.

摘要

引言

输血需要患者签署书面知情同意书。然而,患者对输血的了解不足,这从他们在知情同意讨论中保留的非标准化信息中可见一斑。问题源于患者对知情同意要素的了解不够充分。本研究描述了一种新问卷的开发与验证过程,该问卷旨在从患者角度评估对输血知情同意的了解情况。

对象与方法

开发阶段包括文献综述、小组讨论、专家评审会议、内容及表面效度评估。我们在马来西亚理科大学医院的95名患者样本中,使用信度测试和项目反应理论评估了《输血知情同意问卷》(ICBTQ)的心理测量特性。

结果

ICBTQ的制定包括社会人口统计学和知识部分。ICBTQ具有出色的内容效度。清晰度和理解度的表面效度指数(FVI)均为0.97。因此,总体FVI为0.96。根据一位内容专家的建议增加了一个项目。ICBTQ具有出色的表面效度。在验证阶段,ICBTQ显示出可接受的克朗巴哈系数值。鉴于校正后的项目与总分相关性较低,删除了一个项目。在项目反应理论(IRT)分析中,ICBTQ表现出良好的难度和区分指数。项目拟合评估表明该模型的所有项目拟合良好。

结论

基于IRT和信度分析,ICBTQ的知识部分在心理测量学上对患者是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/0d02a2646e9c/AJTS-18-35-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/230bb508b7ef/AJTS-18-35-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/205255e025d6/AJTS-18-35-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/6b042a2e3786/AJTS-18-35-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/0d02a2646e9c/AJTS-18-35-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/230bb508b7ef/AJTS-18-35-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/205255e025d6/AJTS-18-35-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/6b042a2e3786/AJTS-18-35-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0cf/11259331/0d02a2646e9c/AJTS-18-35-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of informed consent for blood transfusion questionnaire.输血知情同意书问卷的编制与验证
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2024 Jan-Jun;18(1):35-44. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_176_21. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
2
Development and validation of Chronic Kidney Disease Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (CKD-KAP) questionnaire.慢性肾脏病知识、态度与行为(CKD-KAP)问卷的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 11;9:956449. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.956449. eCollection 2022.
3
Development and validation of a new knowledge, attitude, belief and practice questionnaire on leptospirosis in Malaysia.马来西亚钩端螺旋体病知识、态度、信念和实践新问卷的编制与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 7;18(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5234-y.
4
Content and face validity of Workplace COVID-19 Knowledge & Stigma Scale (WoCKSS).工作场所 COVID-19 知识与污名量表(WoCKSS)的内容和表面效度。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):874. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17614-3.
5
Digitised audio questionnaire for assessment of informed consent comprehension in a low-literacy African research population: development and psychometric evaluation.用于评估非洲低识字率研究人群知情同意理解情况的数字化音频问卷:开发与心理测量学评估
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 24;4(6):e004817. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004817.
6
Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity.知情选择在乳腺 X 光筛查问卷(IMQ)的发展:因素结构、信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2019 Mar 19;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0291-2.
7
Knowledge, Awareness, and Practice of Safety and Emergency Response Among Scuba Divers in Malaysia: Questionnaire Development and Validation.马来西亚水肺潜水员的安全与应急响应知识、意识及实践:问卷编制与验证
Cureus. 2024 Feb 3;16(2):e53521. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53521. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Psychometric validation of an empowerment scale for Spanish-speaking patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎西班牙语患者赋权量表的心理测量学验证。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 30;20(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1741-6.
9
Assessment of perception, attitude, and practice of primary care practitioners towards allergic rhinitis practice guidelines: Development and validation of a new questionnaire.基层医疗从业者对过敏性鼻炎实践指南的认知、态度及实践评估:一份新问卷的编制与验证
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Nov 18;13(12):100482. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100482. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Patient knowledge in anaesthesia: Psychometric development of the RAKQ-The Rotterdam anaesthesia Knowledge questionnaire.患者对麻醉的认知:RAKQ-鹿特丹麻醉知识问卷的心理计量学发展。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0299052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299052. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach's Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers.克朗巴哈α系数检验样本量确定综述:给研究者的简易指南
Malays J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;25(6):85-99. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
2
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
3
Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis.
一种用于测量骨质疏松症患者运动的促进因素、障碍和偏好的新工具的开发与验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 19;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5.
4
The New Era of Informed Consent: Getting to a Reasonable-Patient Standard Through Shared Decision Making.知情同意的新时代:通过共同决策达到合理患者标准。
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2063-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3070.
5
Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.设计与实施内容效度研究:开发一种用于测量以患者为中心的沟通的工具。
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017. eCollection 2015 Jun.
6
Consent for blood transfusion: do patients understand the risks and benefits?输血同意书:患者是否了解风险与益处?
Transfus Med. 2014 Oct;24(5):269-73. doi: 10.1111/tme.12141. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires.问卷预测试的样本量。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jan;24(1):147-51. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
8
[Content validity index in scale development].[量表编制中的内容效度指数]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Feb;37(2):152-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
9
Informed consent for clinical treatment.临床治疗的知情同意书。
CMAJ. 2012 Mar 20;184(5):533-40. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.112120. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
10
Informed consent: a socio-legal study.知情同意:一项社会法律研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2011 Dec;66(5):423-8.