Dean Nicholas S, Albers Patrick, Senthilselvan Ambikaipakan, Bain Alexandra, Mancuso Matthew, McLarty Ryan, Schuler Trevor, Wollin Timothy A, De Shubha K
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Alberta Centre for Urologic Research and Excellence (ACURE), Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Oct;18(10):349-352. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8845.
We sought to identify predictors of failed retrograde ureteric stent (FRS) placement in the setting of obstructing ureteric calculi. In addition to patient- and stone-specific characteristics, we also considered computed tomography (CT) measures of ureteric wall thickness (UWT), as it has shown clinical potential in predicting outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and spontaneous stone passage.
We performed a retrospective, case-control study comparing patients who had successful retrograde stent (SRS) insertions with those who failed stent placement and ultimately required nephrostomy tube (NT) insertion (2013-2019). Patients were identified using administrative data from a shared electronic medical record (capturing all urology patients in our geographic area) and a prospective database capturing all institutional interventional radiology procedures. Patient demographics, as well as clinical and stone characteristics, were then collected, and imaging manually reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in collaboration with a statistician.
A total of 109 patients met inclusion for analysis (34 FRS, 75 SRS). The most common indication for stent insertion included sepsis (79%). On multivariate analysis, both acute kidney injury as primary indication for stent insertion (odds ratio [OR ] 9.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.91-44.00, p=0.006) and UWT (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.74, p=0.007) were found to be significantly associated with FRS placement. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrates an optimal UWT cutoff of 3.2 mm (sensitivity 60.6%, specificity 83.3%).
Elevated UWT and acute kidney injury as an indication for urgent urinary decompression in the setting of obstructing ureteric stones are predictive of FRS placement. These patients may benefit from upfront nephrostomy tube insertion.
我们试图确定在输尿管结石梗阻情况下逆行输尿管支架置入失败(FRS)的预测因素。除了患者和结石的特定特征外,我们还考虑了输尿管壁厚度(UWT)的计算机断层扫描(CT)测量值,因为它在预测冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜检查和结石自然排出的结果方面已显示出临床潜力。
我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,比较了成功逆行支架置入(SRS)的患者与支架置入失败并最终需要置入肾造瘘管(NT)的患者(2013 - 2019年)。使用来自共享电子病历的管理数据(记录我们地理区域内的所有泌尿科患者)和一个前瞻性数据库(记录所有机构介入放射学程序)来识别患者。然后收集患者人口统计学以及临床和结石特征,并对影像进行人工审查。与统计学家合作,使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析进行统计分析。
共有109例患者符合纳入分析标准(34例FRS,75例SRS)。支架置入的最常见指征包括脓毒症(79%)。多变量分析发现,以急性肾损伤作为支架置入的主要指征(比值比[OR]9.16,95%置信区间[CI]1.91 - 44.00,p = 0.006)和UWT(OR 0.34,95% CI 0.15 - 0.74,p = 0.007)均与FRS置入显著相关。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,最佳UWT截断值为3.2 mm(敏感性60.6%,特异性83.3%)。
在输尿管结石梗阻情况下,UWT升高和急性肾损伤作为紧急尿液减压的指征可预测FRS置入。这些患者可能从预先置入肾造瘘管中获益。