• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤药学实践中的公平、多样性与包容性:人人有责。

Equity, diversity, and inclusion in oncology pharmacy practice: Everyone's business.

作者信息

Dettwiller Pascale, Ghiya Suhani, McLean Jurga, O'Callaghan Stewart, Sanni AdeDolapo, Shaunak Nisha, So Lilia, Williamson Steve, Nabhani-Gebara Shereen

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Department of Rural Health, The University of South Australia, Port Lincoln, South Australia, Australia.

Pharmacy Department, The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2025 Sep;31(6):878-886. doi: 10.1177/10781552241264717. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1177/10781552241264717
PMID:39042935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12290223/
Abstract

IntroductionEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) is gaining increased attention within all industries healthcare being no exception. The terminology Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion and its abbreviation EDI gained popularity in the early 2000's when varied socio-political factors prompted many organisations to examine EDI concepts and how to operationalise them. The growing diversity of our society requires cross-cultural inclusive approaches to increase equity and access to services.MethodThis unique research is community-led research supported by the British Oncology Pharmacy Association, in which the members of the BOPA community are equal partners to inform action on policies that address EDI. This research was a cross-sectional study involving an online survey of financial BOPA members.ResultsDemographic data was extracted, and the quotes were analysed for common themes. The majority of respondents were women, and the largest age group was between 34 and 44. The first cause of microaggressions identified by the respondents was of racial and ethnic origin, followed by marital status and religious nature. Participants described the lack of diversity in senior positions and the microaggressions experienced by those who hold leadership positions. Some participants described how some situations at work made them feel excluded or alienated. The impact of discrimination and bullying/microaggressions extended to patients was also reported.ConclusionDespite strategic directions encompassing this aspect, this research underscores the pressing need for more evidence on the lack of EDI in healthcare institutions. Our findings, located in the pharmacy oncology specialty, have identified the problem and highlighted the potential benefits of addressing it. More needs to be done in training and professional development to address unconscious bias and change behaviours.

摘要

引言

公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)在所有行业中都越来越受到关注,医疗行业也不例外。公平、多样性和包容性这一术语及其缩写EDI在21世纪初开始流行,当时各种社会政治因素促使许多组织审视EDI概念以及如何将其付诸实践。我们社会日益增长的多样性要求采用跨文化的包容性方法来提高公平性和服务可及性。

方法

这项独特的研究是由英国肿瘤药学协会支持的社区主导研究,其中BOPA社区的成员是平等伙伴,为制定解决EDI问题的政策提供依据。这项研究是一项横断面研究,涉及对BOPA财务成员的在线调查。

结果

提取了人口统计学数据,并对引述内容进行了共同主题分析。大多数受访者为女性,最大年龄组在34至44岁之间。受访者确定的微侵犯的首要原因是种族和民族出身,其次是婚姻状况和宗教性质。参与者描述了高级职位缺乏多样性以及担任领导职位的人所经历的微侵犯。一些参与者描述了工作中的某些情况如何让他们感到被排斥或疏离。还报告了歧视和欺凌/微侵犯对患者的影响。

结论

尽管有涵盖这方面的战略方向,但这项研究强调迫切需要更多关于医疗机构中缺乏EDI的证据。我们在肿瘤药学专业领域的研究结果已经确定了问题,并突出了解决该问题的潜在好处。在培训和专业发展方面还需要做更多工作,以解决无意识偏见并改变行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9302/12290223/fddc774b47b0/10.1177_10781552241264717-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9302/12290223/fda3fb70c71c/10.1177_10781552241264717-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9302/12290223/fddc774b47b0/10.1177_10781552241264717-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9302/12290223/fda3fb70c71c/10.1177_10781552241264717-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9302/12290223/fddc774b47b0/10.1177_10781552241264717-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Equity, diversity, and inclusion in oncology pharmacy practice: Everyone's business.肿瘤药学实践中的公平、多样性与包容性:人人有责。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2025 Sep;31(6):878-886. doi: 10.1177/10781552241264717. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
"You Are the Expert of Your Own Experience": A Thematic Analysis of Experiences of Autism and Gender Diversity in Adulthood.“你是自身经历的专家”:成年期自闭症与性别多样性经历的主题分析
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):300-311. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0111. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
How equitable is the conduct of public health research? Findings across case studies from India and Australia.公共卫生研究的开展有多公平?来自印度和澳大利亚的案例研究结果
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 8;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02593-1.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
9
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
10
Perception on hematology/oncology pharmacy practice and education needs in Nigeria: A national survey.尼日利亚血液学/肿瘤药学实践与教育需求认知:一项全国性调查。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2024 Jul 23:10781552241264553. doi: 10.1177/10781552241264553.

本文引用的文献

1
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Profession of Pharmacy: The Perspective of Three Pharmacy Leaders.药学专业中的多样性、公平性与包容性:三位药学领导者的观点。
HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Apr 28;4(2):77-82. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1561. eCollection 2023.
2
An Exploratory Study of Arab American Pharmacy Educators' Work Experience with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.阿拉伯裔美国药剂学教育工作者多样性、公平性和包容性工作经验探索研究。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe9038. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9038. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
3
Taking Action Towards Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in the Pharmacy Curriculum and Continuing Professional Development.
在药学课程和持续专业发展中采取行动,实现公平、多样性和包容。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Mar;87(2):ajpe8902. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8902. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Critical Theory, Culture Change, and Achieving Health Equity in Health Care Settings.批判理论、文化变迁与医疗环境中健康公平的实现
Acad Med. 2022 Jul 1;97(7):977-988. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004680. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Call to Action for Promoting Social Justice.促进社会正义的行动呼吁。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Oct;85(9):8889. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8889. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Medicine: Why It Matters and How do We Achieve It?医学中的多样性、公平性和包容性:为什么它很重要以及我们如何实现它?
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1058-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Cancer Disparities and Health Equity: A Policy Statement From the American Society of Clinical Oncology.癌症差异与健康公平:美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3439-3448. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00642. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
"Not to exclude you, but…": Characterization of pharmacy student microaggressions and recommendations for academic pharmacy.“不是要把你排除在外,而是……”:药学学生微侵犯的特征描述及对学术药学的建议。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Oct;12(10):1171-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
9
An analysis of the global pharmacy workforce capacity.全球药学劳动力能力分析。
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Oct 10;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0158-z.
10
Report of the 2013-2014 Argus Commission: diversity and inclusion in pharmacy education.2013 - 2014年阿格斯委员会报告:药学教育中的多样性与包容性
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):S21. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810S21.