Suppr超能文献

如何研究躁狂的心理机制?对双相障碍主要理论关于躁狂心境失调的实验研究方法的系统评价。

How to study psychological mechanisms of mania? A systematic review on the methodology of experimental studies on manic mood dysregulation of leading theories on bipolar disorder.

机构信息

Altrecht Institute for Mental Health Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2024 Nov;26(7):646-660. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13463. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although there are several psychological theories on bipolar disorders (BD), the empirical evidence on these theories through experimental studies is still limited. The current study systematically reviews experimental methods used in studies on the main theories of BD: Reward Hypersensitivity Theory (RST) or Behavioral Activation System (BAS), Integrative Cognitive Model (ICM), Positive Emotion Persistence (PEP), Manic Defense theory (MD), and Mental Imagery (MI). The primary aim is to provide an overview of the used methods and to identify limitations and suggest areas of improvement.

METHODS

A systematic search of six databases until October 2023 was conducted. Study selection involved two independent reviewers extracting data on experimental study design and methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 84 experimental studies were reviewed. BAS and RST were the most frequently studied theories. The majority of these experimental studies focus on mechanisms of reward sensitivity. Other important elements of the reviewed theories, such as goal setting and-attainment, situation selection (avoidance or approach), activation, affective/emotional reactivity, and regulatory strategies, are understudied. Self-report and neuropsychological tasks are most often used, while mood induction and physiological measures are rarely used.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for more consensus on the operationalization of psychological theories of mania. Standardization of test batteries could improve comparability among studies and foster a more systematic approach to experimental research. Research on affective (activated) states is still underrepresented in comparison with studies on trait vulnerabilities.

摘要

简介

尽管有几种关于双相情感障碍(BD)的心理学理论,但通过实验研究验证这些理论的实证证据仍然有限。本研究系统地回顾了关于 BD 的主要理论的实验方法:奖励敏感性理论(RST)或行为激活系统(BAS)、综合认知模型(ICM)、积极情绪持续(PEP)、躁狂防御理论(MD)和心理意象(MI)。主要目的是提供对所用方法的概述,并确定局限性并提出改进领域。

方法

对六个数据库进行了截至 2023 年 10 月的系统搜索。研究选择涉及两位独立的评论员,他们负责提取关于实验研究设计和方法学的数据。

结果

共审查了 84 项实验研究。BAS 和 RST 是研究最多的理论。这些实验研究大多侧重于奖励敏感性的机制。已审查理论的其他重要元素,如目标设定和实现、情况选择(回避或接近)、激活、情感/情绪反应性以及调节策略,研究不足。最常使用自我报告和神经心理学任务,而很少使用情绪诱导和生理测量。

结论

需要就躁狂症的心理理论的操作达成更多共识。测试电池的标准化可以提高研究之间的可比性,并促进对实验研究的更系统方法。与研究特质脆弱性相比,情感(激活)状态的研究仍然代表性不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验