• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人体研究中的诚实性。

Honesty in Human Subject Research.

作者信息

Um Sungwoo

机构信息

Department of Ethics Education, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-Ro, 11-411, Gwanak-Gu, 08826, South Korea.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10357-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11673-024-10357-9
PMID:39046698
Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the ethical issues related to deception in human subject research in terms of honesty. First, I introduce the background and suggest the conception of honesty that understands it as involving respect for the right not to be deceived (RND). Next, I examine several ways to address the ethical issues of deceptive elements in the human subject research and show why they fail to adequately meet the demand of honesty. I focus on how to make an honest research plan and examine after participation and before participation phases in turn. Then I conclude by suggesting possible strategies to minimize dishonesty in human subject research.

摘要

在本文中,我从诚实的角度讨论了与人类受试者研究中的欺骗相关的伦理问题。首先,我介绍了背景并提出了诚实的概念,即将其理解为涉及尊重不被欺骗的权利(RND)。接下来,我研究了几种处理人类受试者研究中欺骗性因素伦理问题的方法,并说明它们为何未能充分满足诚实的要求。我重点关注如何制定诚实的研究计划,并依次审视参与后阶段和参与前阶段。然后,我通过提出尽量减少人类受试者研究中不诚实行为的可能策略来得出结论。

相似文献

1
Honesty in Human Subject Research.人体研究中的诚实性。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10357-9.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Emergency innovation: implications for the trauma surgeon.紧急创新:对创伤外科医生的启示
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1443-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bba255.
4
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后的肺康复治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 8;12(12):CD005305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005305.pub4.
7
Informed Consent and Debriefing When Deceiving Participants: A Systematic Review of Research Ethics Guidelines.知情同意与欺骗参与者后的解释说明:研究伦理准则的系统综述
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):118-133. doi: 10.1177/15562646231173477. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Vulnerability in research ethics: A systematic review of policy guidelines and documents.研究伦理中的脆弱性:政策指南与文件的系统综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0327086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327086. eCollection 2025.
9
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
10
Teaching of Medical Ethics Regarding Children, Death and Dying, and Research at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) During Its First Fifty Years.美国军医大学(USUHS)头五十年间关于儿童、死亡与濒死以及研究方面的医学伦理学教学
Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30;190(7-8):1386-1390. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae546.

本文引用的文献

1
What I see and what I feel: the influence of deceptive visual cues and interoceptive accuracy on affective valence and sense of effort during virtual reality cycling.所见与所感:虚拟现实骑行过程中欺骗性视觉线索和内感受准确性对情感效价和努力感的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Oct 4;11:e16095. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16095. eCollection 2023.
2
Deception in the pursuit of science.科学探索中的欺骗行为。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 22;164(6):597-600. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.597.
3
A confederate's perspective on deception.一名同谋者对欺骗行为的看法。
Ethics Behav. 1991;1(4):253-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0104_3.
4
Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable?医学与行为研究中的欺骗行为:它是否有可接受之时?
Milbank Q. 1996;74(1):87-114.
5
Informed consent, deception, and the use of disguised alcohol questionnaires.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1989;15(3):309-19. doi: 10.3109/00952998908993411.