Zhu Lan, Dong Haipeng, Sun Jing, Wang Lingyun, Xing Yue, Hu Yangfan, Lu Junjie, Yang Jiarui, Chu Jingshen, Yan Chao, Yuan Fei, Zhong Jingyu
Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb;35(2):871-884. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10976-1. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
To evaluate the robustness of radiomics features among photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) systems.
A texture phantom consisting of twenty-eight materials was scanned with one PCD-CT and four DECT systems (dual-source, rapid kV-switching, dual-layer, and sequential scanning) at three dose levels twice. Thirty sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV were reconstructed. Regions of interest were delineated for each material with a rigid registration. Ninety-three radiomics were extracted per PyRadiomics. The test-retest repeatability between repeated scans was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intra-system reproducibility between dose levels, and inter-system reproducibility within the same dose level, were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-system variability among five scanners was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).
The test-retest repeatability analysis presented that 97.1% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.945 ± 0.079 and 0.945 ± 0.079 for intra-system reproducibility, respectively, and 86.0% and 85.7% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively, between different dose levels. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.157 ± 0.174 and 0.157 ± 0.174 for inter-system reproducibility, respectively, and none of the features were with ICC > 0.90 or CCC > 0.90 within the same dose level. The inter-system variability suggested that 6.5% and 12.8% of features were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, respectively, among five CT systems.
The radiomics features were non-reproducible with significant variability in values among different CT techniques.
Radiomics features are non-reproducible with significant variability in values among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems, necessitating careful attention to improve the cross-system generalizability of radiomic features before implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.
CT radiomics stability should be guaranteed before the implementation in the clinical routine. Radiomics robustness was on a low level among photon-counting detectors and dual-energy CT techniques. Limited inter-system robustness of radiomic features may impact the generalizability of models.
评估光子计数探测器CT(PCD-CT)和双能CT(DECT)系统之间放射组学特征的稳健性。
使用一台PCD-CT和四台DECT系统(双源、快速kV切换、双层和序列扫描)在三个剂量水平下对由28种材料组成的纹理体模进行两次扫描。重建了30组70keV的虚拟单色图像。通过刚性配准为每种材料划定感兴趣区域。每个PyRadiomics提取93个放射组学特征。通过Bland-Altman分析评估重复扫描之间的重测重复性。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性相关系数(CCC)评估剂量水平之间的系统内再现性以及相同剂量水平内的系统间再现性。通过变异系数(CV)和四分位数离散系数(QCD)评估五台扫描仪之间的系统间变异性。
重测重复性分析表明,97.1%的特征在扫描-重扫描之间是可重复的。系统内再现性的平均±标准差ICC和CCC分别为0.945±0.079和0.945±0.079,不同剂量水平之间分别有86.0%和85.7%的特征ICC>0.90和CCC>0.90。系统间再现性的平均±标准差ICC和CCC分别为0.157±0.174和0.157±0.174,在相同剂量水平内没有特征ICC>0.90或CCC>0.90。系统间变异性表明,在五台CT系统中,分别有6.5%和12.8%的特征CV<10%和QCD<10%。
放射组学特征不可重复,不同CT技术之间的值存在显著变异性。
放射组学特征不可重复,在光子计数探测器CT和双能CT系统之间的值存在显著变异性,在临床常规中实施放射组学分析之前,需要谨慎关注以提高放射组学特征的跨系统通用性。
在临床常规应用之前应确保CT放射组学的稳定性。在光子计数探测器和双能CT技术中,放射组学的稳健性处于较低水平。放射组学特征有限的系统间稳健性可能会影响模型的通用性。