Kumar A, Mariappuram J, Kim C H
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1985 Nov;3(6):509-14. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(85)80007-9.
The techniques of fluorescent antibody (FA) and counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) were compared with the Neufeld test (quellung reaction) for typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. A total of 88 isolates were examined by these three methods. Pool-, type-, or group-specific pneumococcal antisera were used in all three methods. Each isolate was initially tested with polyvalent antisera and all of the nine pools of antisera. Selection of the type- or group-specific antisera depended upon the reaction of the isolate with the pool sera. Sixty-eight of 88 (77.3%) isolates were positive using pool or typing sera and were correctly typed by CIE, while FA was found to be accurate for only 61 of 88 (69.3%) isolates. Positive reactions with more than one pool- or type-specific antisera, or no reaction, were seen with several of the isolates with both techniques. Even though CIE and FA are rapid and simple techniques, microbiologists should be cautious when utilizing them for typing of S. pneumoniae because of the discrepancies observed in this study.
将荧光抗体(FA)技术和对流免疫电泳(CIE)技术与用于肺炎链球菌分型的纽费尔德试验(荚膜肿胀反应)进行了比较。采用这三种方法共检测了88株分离株。在所有这三种方法中均使用了多价、型特异性或群特异性肺炎球菌抗血清。每种分离株首先用多价抗血清和所有九组抗血清进行检测。型特异性或群特异性抗血清的选择取决于分离株与混合血清的反应。88株分离株中有68株(77.3%)使用混合血清或分型血清呈阳性,并通过CIE正确分型,而FA仅对88株分离株中的61株(69.3%)检测准确。两种技术对几株分离株均出现了与一种以上混合或型特异性抗血清呈阳性反应或无反应的情况。尽管CIE和FA是快速且简单的技术,但由于本研究中观察到的差异,微生物学家在利用它们进行肺炎链球菌分型时应谨慎。