Dissolving magnesium hydroxide implants enhance mainly cancellous bone formation whereas degrading RS66 implants lead to prominent periosteal bone formation in rabbits.

Bone fractures often require internal fixation using plates or screws. Normally, these devices are made of permanent metals like titanium providing necessary strength and biocompatibility. However, they can also cause long-term complications and may require removal. An interesting alternative are biocompatible degradable devices, which provide sufficient initial strength and then degrade gradually. Among other materials, biodegradable magnesium alloys have been developed for craniofacial and orthopaedic applications. Previously, we tested implants made of magnesium hydroxide and RS66, a strong and ductile ZK60-based alloy, with respect to biocompatibility and degradation behaviour. Here, we compare the effects of dissolving magnesium hydroxide and RS66 cylinders on bone regeneration and bone growth in rabbit condyles using microtomographical and histological analysis. Both magnesium hydroxide and RS66 induced a considerable osteoblastic activity leading to distinct but different spatio-temporal patterns of cancellous and periosteal bone growth. Dissolving RS66 implants induced a prominent periosteal bone formation on the medial surface of the original condyle whereas dissolving magnesium hydroxide implants enhance mainly cancellous bone formation. Especially periosteal bone formation was completed after 6 and 8 weeks, respectively. The observed bone promoting functions are in line with previous reports of magnesium stimulating cancellous and periosteal bone growth and possible underlying signalling mechanisms are discussed. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Biodegradable magnesium based implants are promising candidates for use in orthopedic and traumatic surgery. Although these implants are in the scientific focus for a long time, comparatively little is known about the interactions between degrading magnesium and the biological environment. In this work, we investigated the effects of two degrading cylindrical magnesium implants (MgOH and RS66) both on bone regeneration and on bone growth. Both MgOH and RS66 induce remarkable osteoblastic activities, however with different spatio-temporal patterns regarding cancellous and periosteal bone growth. We hypothesize that degradation products do not diffuse directionless away, but are transported by the restored blood flow in specific spatial patterns which is also dependent on the used surgical technique.