Suppr超能文献

迈向基于科学的加工食品分类,以支持有意义的研究和有效的健康政策。

Toward a science-based classification of processed foods to support meaningful research and effective health policies.

作者信息

Trumbo Paula R, Bleiweiss-Sande Rachel, Campbell Jessica K, Decker Eric, Drewnowski Adam, Erdman John W, Ferruzzi Mario G, Forde Ciaran G, Gibney Michael J, Hess Julie M, Klurfeld David M, Latulippe Marie E, O'Connor Lauren E, Reimers Kristin J, Rolls Barbara J, Schulz Jackie, Weaver Connie, Yu Lynn

机构信息

Paula R. Trumbo Consulting, Mount Pleasant, SC, United States.

School of Health Sciences, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, United States.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 3;11:1389601. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1389601. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Processed foods have been part of the American diet for decades, with key roles in providing a safe, available, affordable, and nutritious food supply. The USDA Food Guides beginning in 1916 and the US Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) since 1980 have included various types of commonly consumed processed foods (e.g., heated, fermented, dried) as part of their recommendations. However, there are multiple classification systems based on "level" of food processing, and additional evidence is needed to establish the specific properties of foods classified as "highly" or "ultra"-processed (HPF/UPFs). Importantly, many foods are captured under HPF/UPF definitions, ranging from ready-to-eat fortified whole grain breakfast cereals to sugar-sweetened beverages and baked goods. The consequences of implementing dietary guidance to limit all intake of foods currently classified as HPF/UPF may require additional scrutiny to evaluate the impact on consumers' ability to meet daily nutrient recommendations and to access affordable food, and ultimately, on health outcomes. Based on a meeting held by the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences in May 2023, this paper provides perspectives on the broad array of foods classified as HPF/UPFs based on processing and formulation, including contributions to nutrient intake and dietary patterns, food acceptability, and cost. Characteristics of foods classified as UPF/HPFs are considered, including the roles and safety approval of food additives and the effect of food processing on the food matrix. Finally, this paper identifies information gaps and research needs to better understand how the processing of food affects nutrition and health outcomes.

摘要

几十年来,加工食品一直是美国人饮食的一部分,在提供安全、可获取、价格合理且营养丰富的食品供应方面发挥着关键作用。自1916年起的美国农业部食品指南以及自1980年起的美国膳食指南(DGA)都将各类常见的加工食品(如经过加热、发酵、干燥处理的食品)纳入了其推荐范围。然而,基于食品加工“程度”存在多种分类系统,还需要更多证据来确定被归类为“高度”或“超”加工食品(HPF/UPF)的具体特性。重要的是,许多食品都被纳入了HPF/UPF的定义范畴,从即食强化全谷物早餐谷物到含糖饮料和烘焙食品。实施饮食指南以限制目前被归类为HPF/UPF的所有食品的摄入量,其后果可能需要进一步审视,以评估对消费者满足每日营养推荐量的能力以及获取价格合理食品的能力的影响,最终评估对健康结果的影响。基于食品与营养科学发展研究所于2023年5月召开的一次会议,本文从加工和配方的角度,就被归类为HPF/UPF的各类食品提供了观点,包括对营养摄入和饮食模式的贡献、食品可接受性以及成本。文中考虑了被归类为UPF/HPF的食品的特征,包括食品添加剂的作用和安全批准情况以及食品加工对食品基质的影响。最后,本文确定了信息空白和研究需求,以更好地理解食品加工如何影响营养和健康结果。

相似文献

5
Food processing: criteria for dietary guidance and public health?食品加工:膳食指导和公共卫生的标准?
Proc Nutr Soc. 2019 Feb;78(1):4-18. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118002513. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

7
Reply to Vella and Pai.对韦拉和派伊的回复。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1038/s41430-025-01607-z.

本文引用的文献

4
Ultra-processed foods: Processing versus formulation.超加工食品:加工与配方
Obes Sci Pract. 2023 Jan 26;9(4):435-439. doi: 10.1002/osp4.657. eCollection 2023 Aug.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验