Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Adv Nutr. 2023 Nov;14(6):1255-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
Our objective was to convene interdisciplinary experts from government, academia, and industry to develop a Research Roadmap to identify research priorities about processed food intake and risk for obesity and cardiometabolic diseases (CMD) among United States populations. We convened attendees at various career stages with diverse viewpoints in the field. We held a "Food Processing Primer" to build foundational knowledge of how and why foods are processed, followed by presentations about how processed foods may affect energy intake, obesity, and CMD risk. Breakout groups discussed potential mechanistic and confounding explanations for associations between processed foods and obesity and CMD risk. Facilitators created research questions (RQs) based on key themes from discussions. Different breakout groups convened to discuss what is known and unknown for each RQ and to develop sub-RQs to address gaps. Workshop attendees focused on ultra-processed foods (UPFs; Nova Group 4) because the preponderance of evidence is based on this classification system. Yet, heterogeneity and subjectivity in UPF classification was a challenge for RQ development. The 6 RQs were: 1) What objective methods or measures could further categorize UPFs, considering food processing, formulation, and the interaction of the two? 2) How can exposure assessment of UPF intake be improved? 3) Does UPF intake influence risk for obesity or CMDs, independent of diet quality? 4) What, if any, attributes of UPFs influence ingestive behavior and contribute to excess energy intake? 5) What, if any, attributes of UPFs contribute to clinically meaningful metabolic responses? 6) What, if any, external environmental factors lead people to consume high amounts of UPFs? Uncertainty and complexity around UPF intake warrant further complementary and interdisciplinary causal, mechanistic, and methodological research related to obesity and CMD risk to understand the utility of applying classification by degree of processing to foods in the United States.
我们的目标是召集政府、学术界和工业界的跨学科专家,制定研究路线图,确定美国人群中加工食品摄入与肥胖和心血管代谢疾病(CMD)风险相关的研究重点。我们召集了具有不同观点和不同职业阶段的与会者。我们首先举办了一个“食品加工基础课程”,以建立关于食品如何以及为何被加工的基本知识,然后介绍了加工食品如何影响能量摄入、肥胖和 CMD 风险。分组讨论了加工食品与肥胖和 CMD 风险之间关联的潜在机制和混杂解释。主持人根据讨论的关键主题创建了研究问题(RQ)。不同的分组讨论了每个 RQ 的已知和未知内容,并制定了子 RQ 以解决差距。研讨会参与者专注于超加工食品(UPF;Nova 组 4),因为绝大多数证据都基于这一分类系统。然而,UPF 分类的异质性和主观性是 RQ 制定的一个挑战。这 6 个 RQ 是:1)考虑到食品加工、配方以及两者的相互作用,有哪些客观方法或措施可以进一步对 UPF 进行分类?2)如何改进 UPF 摄入量的暴露评估?3)UPF 摄入是否会独立于饮食质量影响肥胖或 CMD 的风险?4)如果有,哪些 UPF 特性会影响摄食行为并导致过量能量摄入?5)如果有,哪些 UPF 特性会导致有临床意义的代谢反应?6)哪些外部环境因素会导致人们摄入大量 UPF?UPF 摄入量的不确定性和复杂性需要进一步进行补充和跨学科的因果关系、机制和方法学研究,以了解将加工程度分类应用于美国食品的效用与肥胖和 CMD 风险相关。