Shuman Abigail, Umble Karl, McCarty Dana B
Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63110. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Parental presence in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is known to improve the health outcomes of an admitted infant. The use of the electronic health record (EHR) to analyze associations between parental presence and sociodemographic factors could provide important insights to families at greatest risk for limited presence during their infant's NICU stay, but there is little evidence about the accuracy of nonvital clinical measures such as parental presence in these datasets. A data validation study was conducted comparing the percentage agreement of an observational log of parental presence to the EHR documentation. Overall, high accuracy values were found when combining two methods of documentation. Additional stratification using a more specific measure, each chart's complete accuracy, instead of overall accuracy, revealed that night shift documentation was more accurate than day shift documentation (76.3% accurate during night shifts, 55.2% accurate during day shifts) and that flowsheet (FS) recordings were more accurate than the free-text plan of care (POC) notes (82.4% accurate for FS, 75.1% accurate for POC notes). This research provides a preliminary look at the accuracy of EHR documentation of nonclinical factors and can serve as a methodological roadmap for other researchers who intend to use EHR data.
新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中有家长陪伴已知可改善入院婴儿的健康结局。利用电子健康记录(EHR)分析家长陪伴与社会人口学因素之间的关联,可为那些在婴儿入住NICU期间陪伴时间有限风险最大的家庭提供重要见解,但几乎没有证据表明这些数据集中诸如家长陪伴等非关键临床指标的准确性。开展了一项数据验证研究,比较家长陪伴观察日志与EHR记录的百分比一致性。总体而言,将两种记录方法结合使用时发现准确性较高。使用更具体的指标(即每张图表的完全准确性而非总体准确性)进行额外分层后发现,夜班记录比白班记录更准确(夜班时准确率为76.3%,白班时准确率为55.2%),并且流程表(FS)记录比护理计划(POC)的自由文本注释更准确(FS准确率为82.4%,POC注释准确率为75.1%)。本研究初步探讨了EHR中非临床因素记录的准确性,可为其他打算使用EHR数据的研究人员提供方法学路线图。