Morales Manuel S
Science, Math, Technology Division, Rowan College at Burlington County, Mount Laurel, NJ, United States.
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Jul 11;9:1404371. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1404371. eCollection 2024.
Experimenter bias compromises the integrity and advancement of science, especially when awarded as such. For example, the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for the loophole-free experiments that tested physicist John S. Bell's inequality theorem. These experiments employed the logic of conducting local experiments to obtain local evidence that contradicted local realistic theories of nature, thereby validating quantum mechanics as a fundamental non-local theory. However, there was one loophole that was wittingly not tested by the Nobel laureates. The notable exception was Bell's "super-deterministic" loophole, which was validated (2000) (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2010) (2011) (2012) non-locally, thus compromising the subsequent Nobel Prize. More importantly, the discovery of two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive non-local hidden variables revealed why local scientific methods obtain false-positive and false-negative results. With knowledge of this fundamental omission, the inclusion of the non-local hidden variables in the local methods used in science can then advance it to be a complete study of nature.
实验者偏差损害了科学的完整性和进步,尤其是在被授予奖项时。例如,2022年诺贝尔物理学奖授予了无漏洞实验,这些实验测试了物理学家约翰·S·贝尔的不等式定理。这些实验采用了进行局部实验的逻辑,以获得与局部实在论自然理论相矛盾的局部证据,从而将量子力学验证为一种基本的非局部理论。然而,有一个漏洞是诺贝尔奖获得者故意没有测试的。值得注意的例外是贝尔的“超决定论”漏洞,该漏洞在2000年、2001年、2002年、2003年、2004年、2005年、2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年被非局部地验证,从而损害了随后的诺贝尔奖。更重要的是,发现了两个相互排斥且共同穷尽的非局部隐藏变量,揭示了为什么局部科学方法会获得假阳性和假阴性结果。有了这一基本遗漏的知识,将非局部隐藏变量纳入科学中使用的局部方法,就可以将其推进为对自然的完整研究。