Suppr超能文献

高渗盐水治疗心力衰竭门诊患者的疗效和安全性:SALT-HF 试验。

Efficacy and safety of hypertonic saline therapy in ambulatory patients with heart failure: The SALT-HF trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER Cardiovascular), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;26(10):2118-2128. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3390. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

Abstract

AIMS

Combination of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) with intravenous loop diuretics has been suggested to improve diuretic response in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The efficacy and safety of this approach in the ambulatory setting remain unexplored.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicentre, double-blind, randomized study, we allocated ambulatory patients with worsening heart failure (WHF) to a 1-h infusion of intravenous furosemide (Furosemide)-HSS versus Furosemide. The primary endpoint was the volume of diuresis at 3 h. Secondary endpoints included 3-h natriuresis and weight variation, 7-day congestion data, kidney function and electrolytes, and 30-day clinical events. Overall, 167 participants (median age: 81 years, 30.5% female) were randomized across 13 sites between December 2020 and March 2023. There were no differences in 3-h diuresis between treatments (Furosemide-HSS: 1099 ml vs. Furosemide: 1103 ml, p = 0.963), 3-h natriuresis (∆ +2.642 mEq/L, p = 0.559), or 3-h weight (∆ +0.012 kg, p = 0.920). Patients in the Furosemide-HSS arm experienced significant weight decrease at 7 days (Δ -0.586 kg, p = 0.048). There were no between-treatment differences in clinical congestion score, biomarkers, inferior vena cava diameter, or the presence of lung ultrasound B-lines. At 30 days, 26.5% of the patients in the Furosemide-HSS group versus 33.3% in the Furosemide group experienced WHF (hazard ratio 0.76, p = 0.330). The incidence of death from any cause or HF hospitalization was 6% of patients in the Furosemide-HSS group and 8.3% of patients in the Furosemide group (hazard ratio 0.69, p = 0.521). The incidence of worsening kidney function or metabolic derangements was not significantly different in the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

A single infusion of Furosemide-HSS did not improve 3-h diuresis or congestion parameters in patients with ambulatory WHF. This therapy showed an appropriate safety profile.

摘要

目的

在因心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者中,联合应用高渗盐水溶液(HSS)和静脉滴注袢利尿剂已被证明可改善利尿反应。这种方法在门诊环境中的疗效和安全性仍有待探索。

方法和结果

在这项多中心、双盲、随机研究中,我们将病情恶化的心力衰竭(WHF)的门诊患者随机分为静脉注射呋塞米(Furosemide)-HSS 组和 Furosemide 组,进行 1 小时静脉滴注。主要终点是 3 小时时的尿量。次要终点包括 3 小时时的钠排泄量和体重变化、7 天充血数据、肾功能和电解质以及 30 天临床事件。2020 年 12 月至 2023 年 3 月,共有 13 个地点的 167 名患者(中位年龄:81 岁,30.5%为女性)被随机分配到两组。两种治疗方法在 3 小时时的尿量(Furosemide-HSS:1099ml 比 Furosemide:1103ml,p=0.963)、3 小时时的钠排泄量(变化+2.642mEq/L,p=0.559)或 3 小时时的体重(变化+0.012kg,p=0.920)均无差异。Furosemide-HSS 组患者在 7 天时体重明显下降(Δ-0.586kg,p=0.048)。两种治疗方法在临床充血评分、生物标志物、下腔静脉直径或肺部超声 B 线的存在方面均无差异。在 30 天时,Furosemide-HSS 组有 26.5%的患者和 Furosemide 组有 33.3%的患者经历了新的 WHF(风险比 0.76,p=0.330)。Furosemide-HSS 组有 6%的患者和 Furosemide 组有 8.3%的患者因任何原因或 HF 住院而死亡(风险比 0.69,p=0.521)。两组肾功能恶化或代谢紊乱的发生率无显著差异。

结论

单次输注 Furosemide-HSS 并未改善门诊 WHF 患者的 3 小时尿量或充血参数。这种治疗方法具有适当的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验