• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校中的功能性沟通训练:对生态有效性证据的系统分析。

Functional Communication Training in Schools: A Systematic Analysis of the Evidence for Ecological Validity.

机构信息

Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.

University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 2024 Nov;48(5-6):502-536. doi: 10.1177/01454455241264816. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1177/01454455241264816
PMID:39056488
Abstract

Ecological validity refers to the meaningfulness or practical significance of research outcomes in everyday settings or the extent to which an intervention can be implemented by typical people during naturally occurring opportunities. In education, ecological validity may contribute to the adoption of interventions by teachers working with students in school settings. Our purpose in this review was to examine the evidence for ecological validity of functional communication training (FCT) used to address challenging behavior in school-age individuals with disabilities. We reviewed 19 single-case experimental design (SCED) studies published between 1985 and 2023. First, we used the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Standards to evaluate the empirical evidence of each study. Second, we evaluated the extent to which behavioral assessment and FCT procedures were described in the 15 studies that met the WWC Standards. Third, we conducted a systematic analysis of the evidence for ecological validity of behavioral assessment and FCT. Results indicate that 95% of the SCED studies met the WWC Standards. The description of procedures was complete for 50% of the behavioral assessments and for 11% of the FCT. The overall evidence for ecological validity was moderate for 16.7% and low for 83.3% of the behavioral assessments. The evidence for ecological validity for all FCT procedures was low. Future research and implications related to ecological validity are discussed.

摘要

生态效度是指研究结果在日常环境中的有意义或实际意义,或者干预措施在自然发生的机会中可以被典型人群实施的程度。在教育中,生态效度可能有助于教师在学校环境中采用针对残疾学生的干预措施。我们在本次综述中的目的是检验用于解决残疾学龄个体挑战性行为的功能性沟通训练(FCT)的生态效度的证据。我们回顾了 1985 年至 2023 年期间发表的 19 项单案例实验设计(SCED)研究。首先,我们使用 What Works Clearinghouse(WWC)标准来评估每项研究的实证证据。其次,我们评估了在符合 WWC 标准的 15 项研究中,行为评估和 FCT 程序的描述程度。第三,我们对行为评估和 FCT 的生态效度证据进行了系统分析。结果表明,95%的 SCED 研究符合 WWC 标准。50%的行为评估和 11%的 FCT 程序的描述是完整的。16.7%的行为评估具有中等的生态效度证据,83.3%的行为评估具有较低的生态效度证据。所有 FCT 程序的生态效度证据均较低。未来的研究和与生态效度相关的影响将被讨论。

相似文献

1
Functional Communication Training in Schools: A Systematic Analysis of the Evidence for Ecological Validity.学校中的功能性沟通训练:对生态有效性证据的系统分析。
Behav Modif. 2024 Nov;48(5-6):502-536. doi: 10.1177/01454455241264816. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
A Systematic Review of Parent-Implemented Functional Communication Training for Children With ASD.针对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的家长实施功能性沟通训练的系统评价。
Behav Modif. 2018 May;42(3):335-363. doi: 10.1177/0145445517740872. Epub 2017 Dec 3.
3
Generalization and maintenance of functional communication training for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic and quality review.发展性障碍个体的功能性沟通训练的泛化和维持:系统和质量评价。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;79:116-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
The Ecological Validity of Research Studies on Function-Based Interventions in Schools for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.针对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的学校中基于功能的干预措施研究的生态效度
Behav Modif. 2022 Jan;46(1):202-229. doi: 10.1177/0145445520964921. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
6
A systematic review of Functional Communication Training (FCT) interventions involving augmentative and alternative communication in school settings.系统评价在学校环境中使用辅助沟通的功能性沟通训练(FCT)干预措施。
Augment Altern Commun. 2018 Jun;34(2):118-129. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1461240.
7
Renewal during functional communication training.功能性沟通训练期间的更新。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jul;51(3):603-619. doi: 10.1002/jaba.471. Epub 2018 May 21.
8
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
9
Behavioral interventions for Black male students: A systematic review.针对黑人男性学生的行为干预措施:一项系统综述。
Sch Psychol. 2025 Mar;40(2):133-144. doi: 10.1037/spq0000668. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
10
A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior.代币制作为一种课堂管理工具在有行为挑战的学生中的系统评价。
J Sch Psychol. 2011 Oct;49(5):529-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jun 28.