García-Mota Luis Francisco, Fernández-Barrera Miguel-Ángel, Garcia-Contreras Rene, Grazioli Guillermo, Zamarripa-Calderón Juan Eliezer, Rivera-Gonzaga José Alejandro, Cuevas-Suárez Carlos Enrique
Dental Materials Laboratory, Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, Circuito Ex Hacienda La Concepción S/N, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, Mexico.
Nanostructures and Biomaterials Area, Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory (LII), National School of Higher Studies (ENES), Leon Unit, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), León 37689, Mexico.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;12(7):206. doi: 10.3390/dj12070206.
The objective of this work was to assess the efficacy of different proteolytic agents on the bond strength of pit and fissure sealants to bovine enamel. Eighty-four bovine enamel specimens were randomly assigned in groups according to the pit and fissure sealant applied (HelioSeal F or Dyad Flow). Then, the specimens were subdivided according to the proteolytic agent used (n = 7): Group 1, distilled water (control); Group 2, 10 wt.% Tergazyme; Group 3, 10 wt.% ZYME; Group 4, 10% papain gel; Group 5, 10% bromelain gel; and Group 6, 5.25 wt.% sodium hypochlorite. The cell viability of the proteolytic solutions was assessed through the MTT assay. The proteolytic agents were applied on the enamel surface prior to the acid-etching procedure; then, the pit and fissure sealants were placed. The micro-shear bond strength was evaluated after 24 h or 6 months of water storing at 37 °C. Representative SEM images were taken for each experimental group. The bond strength data were statistically analyzed by a three-way ANOVA test using a significance level of α = 0.05. Bromelain and papain proteolytic solutions did not exert any cytotoxic effect on the human dental pulp cells. After 24 h and 6 months of aging, for both pit and fissure sealants, sodium hypochlorite, papain, bromelain, and Tergazyme achieved statistically significant higher bond strength values ( < 0.05). Irrespective of the deproteinizing agent used, Dyad Flow resulted in a better bond strength after 6 months of aging. The type 1 etching pattern was identified for sodium hypochlorite, papain, and bromelain. Tergazyme, papain, and bromelain demonstrated efficacy in deproteinizing enamel surfaces prior to acid etching, leading to the improved bond strength of pit and fissure sealants. Clinically, this suggests that these proteolytic agents can be considered viable alternatives to traditional methods for enhancing sealant retention and longevity. Utilizing these agents in dental practice could potentially reduce sealant failures.
本研究的目的是评估不同蛋白水解剂对窝沟封闭剂与牛牙釉质粘结强度的影响。根据所使用的窝沟封闭剂(HelioSeal F或Dyad Flow),将84个牛牙釉质标本随机分组。然后,根据所使用的蛋白水解剂将标本再细分(n = 7):第1组,蒸馏水(对照组);第2组,10 wt.%的Tergazyme;第3组,10 wt.%的ZYME;第4组,10%的木瓜蛋白酶凝胶;第5组,10%的菠萝蛋白酶凝胶;第6组,5.25 wt.%的次氯酸钠。通过MTT法评估蛋白水解溶液的细胞活力。在酸蚀程序之前,将蛋白水解剂应用于牙釉质表面;然后,放置窝沟封闭剂。在37°C下储存24小时或6个月后,评估微剪切粘结强度。为每个实验组拍摄代表性的扫描电子显微镜图像。使用α = 0.05的显著性水平,通过三因素方差分析对粘结强度数据进行统计学分析。菠萝蛋白酶和木瓜蛋白酶蛋白水解溶液对人牙髓细胞没有任何细胞毒性作用。在老化24小时和6个月后,对于两种窝沟封闭剂,次氯酸钠、木瓜蛋白酶、菠萝蛋白酶和Tergazyme均获得了统计学上显著更高的粘结强度值(<0.05)。无论使用何种脱蛋白剂,Dyad Flow在老化6个月后都具有更好的粘结强度。次氯酸钠、木瓜蛋白酶和菠萝蛋白酶呈现出1型蚀刻模式。Tergazyme、木瓜蛋白酶和菠萝蛋白酶在酸蚀前对牙釉质表面进行脱蛋白处理时显示出效果,从而提高了窝沟封闭剂的粘结强度。临床上,这表明这些蛋白水解剂可被视为增强封闭剂保留率和使用寿命的传统方法的可行替代方案。在牙科实践中使用这些药剂可能会减少封闭剂失败的情况。