Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Child's and Adolescent's Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2022 Jun;55(6):579-612. doi: 10.1111/iej.13728. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
The effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are controversial, because, despite releasing growth factors from dentine, some studies show negative effects on cell behaviour.
The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of the use of EDTA in REP on the growth factors' release, cell behaviour and tissue regeneration.
A systematic search was conducted (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, OpenGrey and reference lists) up to February 2021. Only in vivo and in vitro studies evaluating the effects of EDTA on the biological factors of dentine, pulp/periapical tissues and cell behaviour were eligible. Studies without a control group or available full text were excluded. The growth factors' release was the primary outcome. Risk of bias in the in vitro and in vivo studies was performed according to Joanna Briggs Institute's Checklist and SYRCLE's RoB tool, respectively.
Of the 1848 articles retrieved, 36 were selected. Amongst these, 32 were in vitro, three animal studies and one with both models. The EDTA concentrations ranged from 3% to 15%, at different times. Regarding growth factors' release (17 studies), 15 studies found significant transforming growth factor (TGF)-β release after dentine conditioning with EDTA, and most found no influence on vascular endothelial growth factor release. Regarding cell behaviour (26 studies), eight studies showed no influence of EDTA-treated dentine on cell viability, whereas, five, nine and six studies showed higher cell migration, adhesion and differentiation respectively. No influence of EDTA conditioning was observed in animal studies. In vitro studies had a low risk of bias, whereas animal studies had high risk of bias. Meta-analysis was unfeasible.
This review found that EDTA increased TGF-β release and improved cell activity. However, well-designed histological analyses using immature teeth models are needed.
High-quality in vitro evidence suggests that EDTA-treated dentine positively influences TGF-β release, cell migration, attachment and differentiation; further research to evaluate its influence on tissue regeneration is necessary due to low methodological quality of the animal studies.
乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)对再生性牙髓治疗(REP)的影响存在争议,因为尽管它从牙本质中释放生长因子,但一些研究表明其对细胞行为有负面影响。
本研究旨在探讨 EDTA 在 REP 中的应用对生长因子释放、细胞行为和组织再生的影响。
系统检索(PubMed/Medline、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、Embase、OpenGrey 和参考文献列表)至 2021 年 2 月。仅纳入评估 EDTA 对牙本质、牙髓/根尖组织和细胞行为的生物学因素影响的体内和体外研究。排除无对照组或无全文的研究。生长因子释放是主要结局。根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所的清单和 SYRCLE 的 RoB 工具,分别对体内和体外研究进行偏倚风险评估。
在检索到的 1848 篇文章中,有 36 篇被选中。其中,32 篇为体外研究,3 篇为动物研究,1 篇同时采用两种模型。EDTA 浓度范围为 3%至 15%,作用时间不同。关于生长因子释放(17 项研究),15 项研究发现 EDTA 处理牙本质后转化生长因子(TGF)-β显著释放,大多数研究发现对血管内皮生长因子释放无影响。关于细胞行为(26 项研究),8 项研究表明 EDTA 处理牙本质对细胞活力无影响,而 5、9 和 6 项研究分别表明细胞迁移、黏附和分化增加。动物研究未观察到 EDTA 处理的影响。体外研究的偏倚风险较低,而动物研究的偏倚风险较高。Meta 分析不可行。
本综述发现 EDTA 增加了 TGF-β的释放并改善了细胞活性。然而,需要使用未成熟牙齿模型进行设计良好的组织学分析。
高质量的体外证据表明,EDTA 处理牙本质可正向影响 TGF-β释放、细胞迁移、黏附和分化;由于动物研究方法学质量较低,需要进一步研究评估其对组织再生的影响。