Oncology and Medical Specialties Department, Valenciennes General Hospital, 59300 Valenciennes, France.
Equipe de Recherche en Oncologie Translationnelle (EROT), University Mohammed V in Rabat, Rabat 8007, Morocco.
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 30;31(7):3771-3782. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070278.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a clinically challenging subtype due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options post-neoadjuvant failure. Historically, capecitabine has been the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for TNBC patients not achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). However, the integration of new modalities such as immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors has prompted a re-evaluation of traditional post-neoadjuvant approaches.
This review synthesizes data from pivotal clinical trials and meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy of emerging therapies in the post-neoadjuvant setting. We focus on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), PARP inhibitors (PARPis), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) alongside or in place of capecitabine in TNBC treatment paradigms.
The addition of ICIs like pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant regimens has shown increased pCR rates and improved event-free survival, posing new questions about optimal post-neoadjuvant therapies. Similarly, PARPis have demonstrated efficacy in BRCA-mutated TNBC populations, with significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Emerging studies on ADCs further complicate the adjuvant landscape, offering potentially efficacious alternatives to capecitabine, especially in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy.
The challenge remains to integrate these new treatments into clinical practice effectively, considering factors such as drug resistance, patient-specific characteristics, and socio-economic barriers. This review discusses the implications of these therapies and suggests a future direction focused on personalized medicine approaches in TNBC.
As the treatment landscape for TNBC evolves, the role of capecitabine is being critically examined. While it remains a viable option for certain patient groups, the introduction of ICIs, PARPis, and ADCs offers promising alternatives that could redefine adjuvant therapy standards. Ongoing and future trials will be pivotal in determining the optimal therapeutic strategies for TNBC patients with residual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy.
三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)因其侵袭性和新辅助治疗失败后的治疗选择有限仍然是一种具有挑战性的临床亚型。历史上,卡培他滨一直是未能达到病理完全缓解(pCR)的 TNBC 患者辅助治疗的基石。然而,免疫疗法和 PARP 抑制剂等新方法的整合促使人们重新评估传统的新辅助治疗方法。
本综述综合了关键临床试验和荟萃分析的数据,以评估新兴疗法在新辅助治疗环境中的疗效。我们重点关注免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)、PARP 抑制剂(PARPis)和抗体药物偶联物(ADCs)在 TNBC 治疗方案中的作用,以及它们与卡培他滨联合或替代卡培他滨的作用。
在新辅助方案中加入派姆单抗等 ICIs 已显示出增加 pCR 率和改善无事件生存的效果,这对新辅助治疗后的最佳治疗方法提出了新的问题。同样,PARPis 在 BRCA 突变的 TNBC 人群中显示出疗效,无疾病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)有显著改善。ADCs 的新兴研究进一步使辅助治疗复杂化,为卡培他滨提供了潜在有效的替代方案,尤其是在新辅助治疗后仍有残留疾病的患者中。
挑战仍然在于如何有效地将这些新疗法纳入临床实践,考虑药物耐药性、患者个体特征和社会经济障碍等因素。本综述讨论了这些疗法的影响,并提出了一个未来的方向,即专注于 TNBC 的个体化医学方法。
随着 TNBC 治疗领域的发展,卡培他滨的作用正在受到严格审查。虽然它仍然是某些患者群体的可行选择,但 ICIs、PARPis 和 ADCs 的引入提供了有前途的替代方案,可能重新定义辅助治疗标准。正在进行和未来的试验将是确定新辅助治疗后仍有残留疾病的 TNBC 患者最佳治疗策略的关键。